Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 309
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Maybe it says something of her policies when the nation is split over loathing or loving her. Maybe her legacy is one of a deeply divided nation. I know where I stand and i will be going to the pub to have a drink in memory of my friends who died on the Falklands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever you're politics ....... you can't deny she divided opinion.

And was a world class leader.

 

She changed our country, brought it from it knees.

 

And of course, there can't be many that would want to hate post.

She was voted in by the people, ....... 3 times, no less!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever you're politics ....... you can't deny she divided opinion.

And was a world class leader.

 

She changed our country, brought it from it knees.

 

And of course, there can't be many that would want to hate post.

She was voted in by the people, ....... 3 times, no less!!

 

I agree, but bear in mind too that Tony Blair also won 3 elections, so extremely strange things can happen. I must admit I was surprised there wasn't a thread on this already, especially given that she was quite controversial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

World class leaders would have empathy with the people who they lead. She did not. Even Norman Tebbitt, a couple of years ago, said that they were too tough on the general working population. Yes she was voted in but in my opinion 1983 was on the dead of the Falklands. Working people were seduced by the prospect of owning their own homes and no thought was given to the next generation. I won't post hate but I will not lose any sleep. I feel sympathy for her family but sorrow for the thousands of victims in this country who lost their jobs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first triumph was because she was a women, women voted for her in droves, like a 'sisterhood' well planned tactics.

 

With the American Guru in tow there was no stopping this political machine which was going the yankee way.

Edited by determindator
Link to post
Share on other sites

And ATOS was about to find her fit for work...............Oh well.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Margaret Thatcher in my opinion was the greatest Prime Minister since Churchill. She brought this country back from the brink of bankrupsy, and picked it up off its knees put there by the likes of Scargill and Red Robbo and their union cronies. Yes she made mistakes like we all do but for her we would be in a much worse state as a country that we are today. On both occasions 1979, and today caused by a totally incompetent Labour government.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will refrain from commenting on what i felt she "achieved" during her stay in power. However i will say R.I.P as outside her duties in government, she was a very down to earth woman. She just changed when she was dealing with politics.

 

I also agree with the admins here. This thread isnt for a debate on what you think of her. Use another thread for that. If you don't want to say R.I.P, then dont read the thread or hit post. And no, im not a conservative supporter, im as far on the other side as you can possibly get.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Margaret Thatcher in my opinion was the greatest Prime Minister since Churchill. She brought this country back from the brink of bankrupsy, and picked it up off its knees put there by the likes of Scargill and Red Robbo and their union cronies. Yes she made mistakes like we all do but for her we would be in a much worse state as a country that we are today. On both occasions 1979, and today caused by a totally incompetent Labour government.

 

I would like to say i would vehemently disagree with that, but respect your right to an opinion.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a lot left out of the programme, one thing comes to mind was not listening to the warnings of the scientists of giving livestock abnormal feed when introducing intensive farming. We are unaware of the legacy that BSE may bring.

 

Renegadeimp, from what I know of Mrs Thatcher, she was one personality, and not just confined to Politics.

 

I want to add, this is a time of loss for those closest to her and for me now I'm just listeneing to the comments made and reserve my thoughts.

Edited by determindator
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read a few things and also seen proof myself that she was different out of politics. She had her ideals, but rarely put them into the open in her private life. As i said, im as far removed from being a conservative as humanly possible, but i still think she deserves a decent send off, though not at public expense like Cameron is planning to do.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems the press etc are leaving bits out of her life that needs to be addressed

 

She called Nelson Mandela a terrorist, adamantly defended and praised her friend, former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet , and sipped tea with Mugabe, but we do not talk of that, do we

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone knew she was a friend of Mugabe, but at the time he was a big buyer of arms from the UK, so nobody did anything. Same as Cameron is doing now.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same as when the US and UK supplied saddam with all his arms and biological weapons. But we're now getting way off topic. Lets keep the thread on track now.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although a Conservative I didn't want Maggie as the party leader, however she was a strong person who stuck to her principles whatever and you have to admire her for that, also how many ex miners, steelworkers etc would have been able to buy their own council houses? Overall I think that a great British personality has now died and should be given the respect due to everyone when they die.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Assisted Blonde.

Not many ex miners/ steelworkers could buy their houses due to them becoming jobless and having to go on the dole. Thus starting the generation of state dependancy who the Tory party are now further stigmatising. I am happy that some people gained but the vast majority did not. As for Churchill being a great leader, in my opinion he was during the war but didn't he get voted out in 1945?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree... but why not save the taxpayer some money and send her on her way without all the 'pomp and glory'!!! How much is this all going to cost? Surely something small and private would be enough?!

 

What I remember most about the Thatcher years is the following example of insanity:

 

Our neighbours had two kids who ran around without shoes on their feet most of the time. They didn't have a penny to scratch their a***s. Yet, when Thatcher was elected for the last time we could hear them shouting, 'YES!!! WE WON!!!'.

 

Utter madness.

 

Yes, let her rest and have a funeral at her families, or the insurance, expense. I think that the problem is that unless you are over thirty you want remember what a 'lovely' lady she was... excuse the sarcasm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...