Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Financial


IQBAL1610
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5726 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Does anyone know who they are? They say they have bought an old debt, two old debts, of mine.

I recognise one but not the other. The name is mine, and date of birth, but not the address.

Does anyone know which letter I should send them? Would special/recorded delivery make a difference? They have not replied but keep sending more letters saying I must not ignore them, and saying they will send someone to my home. Are they likely to do this? My mother is very old and at home always so I fear for her health if they come when I am not here.

 

How do I go about finding out why they have this debt against my name? I do not wish to call them though. What happens should I ignore their letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have written to them but they seem to have ignored my letter and are sending letters saying they will visit. Is this true? I am worried that they will pester my mother who lives with me and is old and I don't want to worry about this. Also, should I ignore the letters or try and find out what the debt is, as I dont recognise it and it is very large. What if I move? I am looking for my own place. Should I just ignore the letters and move? Does anyone know a helpline as I can't get through to citizens advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have replied to a DCA about debt not recognised. Now they have just adjusted their letters to my correct name- similar to one they gave earlier-and are writing to me threatening action.

Is it best to ignore letters? I understand if there has been no contact for 6 years, it is time barred anyway.

I am worried about ID fraud as the address they gave for me was a 'virtual address' with a mailing company I used years ago when I was working abroad. Possibly someone has run up a debt in my name and now I am being chased for it- what to do? Please help, anyone!!

They have also written to me about a debt which was mine, and I replied to that,offering to pay, but having read this site I realise that they purchased the debt for about 12% of its value so why should I pay them the whole amount of the debt. Should I offer them a small percentage of it intstead or send a letter asking for the consumer credit agreement to be sent within 30 days, as in the letter library here?:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

contact fsa and complain to them

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

I have also read a few other similar posts about credit agreement letters etc. If I do not recognise the debt, should I write with £1 postal order asking for the credit agreement letter anyway? The wait for the 30 days,as someone has suggested?

Link to post
Share on other sites

cca request- seliver it recorded to the legal owners of the debt.

 

they are allowed 12 workind days and one calender month thereafter to provide the signed agreement.

uother wise un enforceable

 

the debt is five years old and if it reachs 6years it cant be collected as the statues of limations forbids it

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that- invaluable advice! I'm so glad I found the sight as I can never get through to CAB when I try to ring.

 

Sorry to ask yet more questions, but if they send a credit agreement and it is less than 6 years ago, what do I do?

 

If the debt has added up because of charges, is there a template of what kind of letter I could send offering only a small amount for the debt? Do I have to prove that my circumstances are dire in order to offer only a small amount?

 

I have read on this site that credit companies usually would sell a debt to a DCA for only about 10-12%, so would it be fair to offer them only 12% plus a bit extra to cover costs and how could I go about doing this? ie. Does anyone know any consumer legislation to quote to back this up? Th debt is large and I cannot afford to pay it, and would rather settle it and clear it all up, if I can,but worried that I have to prove my circumstances first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Can anyone tell me on what basis I can make an offer for a debt bought by a DCA, given that a DCA would buy a debt from a credit card company for only about 10-12% of original debt. As I cannot afford it, do I have to prove this- and how?

 

Also, is there a letter template I can use to make an offer, stating any laws or quoting any credit act? Or can I say that as I know they bought the debt for only a fraction of the original amount, I am only offering them a small percentage plus extra for costs? It seems unfair, for instance that I pay £5000 when they might have bought it for less than £1k.

 

Thanks if anyone can help please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesnt matter how much they bought it for, they have the intention of collection the full amount.

there are template letters though

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer Letter with alternate Payment Strategy

Company Name:

Address:

Date:

Re: Account No.

Dear Sir/ Madam,

I am presently going through some financial difficulties and fear that I will not be able to meet my monthly payments to you. I do not want to declare bankruptcy and want to try and work out an alternate payment plan, so that I don’t have to default on this debt.

I would like to suggest a strategy if it is acceptable. If you could close my account, waive the interest payments and accept a new balance of [50% or whatever you propose] of what I currently owe, I can afford to make a monthly payment of $__________

(Relate your financial trouble, only as much is required for official purposes).

I am sure you will agree to the situation, which has caused this fallout. Please feel free to have one of your representatives call me and work out the final strategy. If you feel, you can’t adjust the payment plan. I would be forced to default on this account. I intend to pay creditors who can work for me.

Thanking you,

Sincerely,

Your Name

Your Address

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they can produce the paperwork then the debt is enforceable and you are liable for it.

 

For a company to reduce payment you have to make it visible that you cannot afford to pay(which may take 6months)

 

arrange an underpayment plan with them to pay off less, and further down the line request for interest to be frozen.

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for the advice. I now just face the task of proving something was not mine from years ago. Hopefully, if they do produce the contract there will be something which will be able to prove it was not set up by me, as I am sure this is not something I took out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All great stuff this with dca's ! Firstly, are you sure the dca owns the debt? Have you done a CCA request on them to see if they are the true owners. If you are paying the money to the wrong people and they don't own it you may as well pay it to me :D

 

By all means follow the advice above, it's good advice if you are sure they own it. Which dca is it?

 

Many do not have the original documentation, deed of assignment or the agreement and under the CCA request( + £1.00 P.O.) they would have to provide that within 12 working days or they will need to have a court order to enforce it. After a fourther month and they don't supply the correct documents they have commited a criminal offence and the debt becomes unenforceable until they come up with the documents. Most DCA's do not have this info and badger you into paying. Let them prove they own the debt, then go into negotiation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew

 

Thanks

I have sent the letter and postal order and am waiting with fingers crossed! One of the debts I recognise, one I don't, so I am hoping that there will be no contract with both, or at least I can clear up why they have assigned a debt to me that I am sure I didn't take out...

 

I have also saved the template letter for after the 30 days, asking them to take the default off- assuming, and I am hoping, that they can't produce anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. It's not so much that you recognise these debts, I think most of us recognise that we had the loan/credit card or account at some time in the past, but it's what happens to them after a period of 'quiet' when you either move addresses a number of times of life just gets so bad you shut off from the consequences. The debt doesn't die, it's just that often the banks will chase for a period until they get fedup/lazy or just find it easier to chase those people they can get hold of. However, the debt remains there on their system and will be live for 6 yrs. Sometime during that period someone will take up on the ledger and find out what has happened to the debt and it all starts again.

 

Some institutions like Egg for example do not sell their debt in the first or even second instance. They just pass it to a collection agent to collect so sending a cca request to the dca is almost pointless. However even Egg give up after a while and like many others they then sell the debt to a collection agency for a fraction of the cost. That's when the legal bits on here become very handy because the agents, in the main, are a bunch of first class *******s. The reason the bank sells the debt is two fold. One is that if things get heavy or dirty to collect they do not want their name dragged through the papers - let the dca take the brunt of it. Second is that they actually get at least some return for the outstanding debt and cut their losses.

 

So thats why it's so important to find out who actually owns the debt and the Consumer Credit Act (CCA) provides procedures which must be followed but have until CAG got out of it's box, been abused. Now they are paying the price for thier sins. The Data Protection Act Subject Access Request to the original bank/ CC company will provide you with all the statements from where you can establish all the charges on your account which you won't get from the DCA.

 

Keep us posted on the results. Good luck with it anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

Can anyone tell me what to do after sending a DCA a letter requesting the original CCA request (after being told they had 'bought' a debt), and getting what looks like a stalling letter back saying that they have asked the credit card company to supply it.

 

Does this mean I have written to the wrong company, and that they therefore don't own the debt?

Do I then have to send a recorded letter asking the same request for CCA of the original credit card company? Or do I allow the 30 days regardless of who should be sending it?

 

And is this a good or bad sign?

 

Please help! Anyone? I would appreciate advice on what to do now.

 

Also, a second letter asking for CCA was sent on the same day, recorded delivery, and no reply has been received. Shall I assume they have it, and have just not got around to answeiring this yet?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is in the hands of a DCA the original agreement is likely to be ended. So there is no obligation for any one to supply the original agreement. S.77/8 only applies during the currency of agreements.

 

To determine who owns the debt you should write to the origianal creditor and ask them who they sold it to or write to the DCA asking for a copy of the deed of assignment. There is no legal obligation to provide the deed of assignment but if you are unsure of who owns the debt then you are entitled to ask them to prove ownership. The original creditor should have informed you that a change of ownership of the debt has taken place.

 

Hope this helps

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thanks for the reply, but I am confused. Sorry to be dim.

 

I wrote a post asking for advice about a DCA which said they had bought a debt from a credit card company, and I was directed to a letter asking for the original consumer credit agreement, which many people had talked about on this sight.

 

I was told that if the original credit agreement could not be produced within 30 days of my request in writing (recorded) using the wording that is one of the letter templates, quoting the consumer credit act (section 78, I think), then I could write another letter saying that the debt would then have to be written off, as legally this must be produced.

 

Is this not correct then? A lot of people seem to havebeen advised to send this CCA request letter, and it features heavily on this sight.

 

Having been sent a letter by the DCA saying that they have asked the original credit card company for the credit agreement, I am now confused as to why they don't have it, if they have bought the debt from them, and what I do now? Does my letter request for the CCA still apply, and therefore, is the clock still 'ticking' for the 30days from when I sent it, or should I also have sent this letter to the credit card company as well, even though the DCA told me in writing that they now 'owned' the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot of confusion on this site about the affect of a CCA request. Unfortunately it only operates to render an agreement unenforceable not the debt. Also it only applies during the currency of agreement and as your debt is with a DCA the original agreement will be terminated.

 

If you are satisfied that the DCA does own the debt then you should start making plans for a payment arrangement. There are template letters and budget planners in the stickies at the top of this page you can use.

 

Hope this helps

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has got me confused as well. I am helping someone out by sending a CCA request to a company for a debt which they claim to now own. From what I have read on this site it doesn't matter who owns the debt, they still have to produce evidence of the original agreement. It makes sense to me- after all anyone could invent a debt and sell it on if they are not obliged to provide proof of the debt.

 

I'm sure the thread I'm thinking of involved a debt which was originally to Citi and ultimately got written off because they couldn't produce evidence of the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...