Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Minicredit - discredited!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I will try and be as brief as possible with this. Here's the deal:

 

Originally applied for a loan with Minicredit 04/03/11 and was declined.

 

Re-applied and was granted loan on 04/07/11. Sent notice of cancellation within 14 days, as per CCA 1974 on 12/07/11. At the same time informing Minicredit, as per rights under that act, repayments would be made within 30 days by Faster Payments, and could they please supply bank details. I also informed them that I no longer authorised them to use my card details.

 

Here's the breakdown of events:

04/07/11 Received £130.50 (£150 less £19.50 deducted without an explicit acceptance of that)

12/07/11 Notice of cancellation given

05/08/11 Minicredit takes £85 from my debit card having still not forwarded bank details

10/08/11 Minicredit takes a further £50 by debit card

 

It was at this point, having repaid £135 which was in excess of the £130.50 I had received that I refused to pay them any more until they agreed that the total payable (as calculated via their website) was £189. Thus I believed I actually owed them £54, but they had received more money than they had paid out (as well as a random £2.50 fee for something).

 

Minicredit claim that my cancellation was incorrect as it was after 14 days from 4th March 2011 when I originally applied and was rejected as that agreement was in force. Well, if that agreement was in force, how come I couldn't borrow against it? AND, why did I have to signed another pre-contract agreement and Minicredit perform another credit search before being allowed the funds on 4th July 2011?

 

They continued to bombard me with calls telling me how many hundreds of pounds I owed them ... Anyway, wind forward 600+ days and I checked my credit file with Noddle and discovered a Default from Minicredit for £547!

 

I didn't even bother writing to them as I'd got nowhere chasing them for months long before. So, instead I wrote to Callcredit with a Notice of Dispute. Minicredit didn't reply within 28 days (there's a surprise) so then entry was suppressed. However, when they did reply, they sai they thought it was valid and thus Callcredit unsuppressed it.

 

I have outlined by grievance about the default to the ICO following their complaints procedure, and included that with my letter back to Minicredit, but suffice to say Minicredit are sticking to their guns, although I now supposedly owe them in excess of £800.

 

My question is how do I resolve this? They say they will not remove the detault without full payment, which is ludicrous. I assume I need to take them to court, and I have no issues with doing that, it's the how I am not sure of. What exactly do I claim for and even then, would that get the default removed?

 

As far as I can see, of OTF664, they have flouted at least 2.2, 3.3j, 3.3k, 3.3l (your number is still listed as an 0871 number), 3.5g, 3.7a, 3.7o, 3.11a and 3.11d yet still think their action is valid.

 

Please help!

 

Thanks,

Tim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first thing you need to do is send a letter by recorded delivery to THE DATA CONTROLLER at mini credit

 

inform them of past reference to this dispute

 

give them 14 days from receipt to remove and default/adverse information or civil action will commence for the unlawful recording of negative data

 

the case law to back this up i believe is Durkin V Dixons store group and HFC bank for you to quote

 

you must put at the top of your letter 14 day letter before action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks squaddie,

 

I have already completed that when I sent them the letter in which I copied in the ICO complaint form. It sounds like they will not be changing their stance in what is now the next 10 days, so how do I go about that Civil claim? If there are any links to the case law that you or anyone knows of, I would be very interested.

 

Tim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've, unsurprisingly, not heard anything back yet, not even an acknowledgement of my letter. In order to prepare for court, what exactly is it I should be taking them to court over and which court/how? I am assuming (and we know what that can do) that I should just use MCOL? If so, what do I claim for? They don't actually owe my anything financial, just a correction to my credit file, which if they'd have done so, I would have left it at that. Do I claim for the current value of the default? If I do, does that mean given the cost of making the claim relates to a specific financial range, am I jeopardising the level of damages if it ever got that far? As you can see, I am really not very sure about the way forward. It may still be it doesn't need to come to this, but it's looking more and more likely ... TIA!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you complained to their data controller and given them 14 days to sort it? Have you issued a dispute with the cra`s and the ico.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi renegadeimp. First I disputed with CRA (Minicredit only report to CallCredit) with a Notice of Dispute. Minicredit didn't reply within 28 days (there's a surprise) so then entry was suppressed. However, when they did reply, they said they thought it was valid and thus Callcredit unsuppressed it.

 

I have outlined by grievancelink3.gif about the default to the ICO following their complaints procedure, and included that with my letter back to Minicredit, but suffice to say Minicredit are sticking to their guns. So, finally, for now sent an LBA to Minicredit (both hard and soft copy) with 14 days to comply:

 

LBA was thus:

 

"Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Thank you for your response, as a result of which it appears obvious that I will need to take court action to resolve this matter. This is not something I take lightly as it will involve cost, but it will once and for all substantiate the validity of your claims. Please be aware that when the court assesses this matter, it will have the power to grant costs and award damages, however, if you were to settle this matter via the ICO and remove the default, that would be the end of the matter.

 

Please note, no loan was forthcoming on 4th March 2011 and therefore, the agreement could NOT have legally been in force. If the loan agreement was in effect, I should have been able to borrow against it and I was not. Additionally, if the agreement was valid, then why did Minicredit, as I can see in my credit reports, take out further searches on the date the loan was taken out and ask me to sign another pre-contract agreement? Your view of the validity of the "loan agreement" dated 4th March 2011 is perverse.

 

If your organisation is prepared to stand up in court and attempt to prove that charges of £778.50 on an amount of £130.50 received are "fair and reasonable" and meet all of the statements detailed in OFT664Rev, including, but not limited to clauses, 2.2, 3.3j, 3.3k, 3.3l (your number is still listed as an 0871 number), 3.5g, 3.7a, 3.7o, 3.11a, 3.11d then that it what shall happen.

 

Therefore, I can confirm that I will initiate court action as defined in my previous communication within 14 days unless you confirm you have instructed Callcredit to remove the default from my account."

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have taken a default issue to the FOS before and I think they do have the power to remove it? Although the outcome did not rule in my favour (probably correctly), atleast it was looked into and the company I was complaining about got slapped with, I believe, a £500 bill for me taking the complaint to the FOS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you complained to their data controller and given them 14 days to sort it? Have you issued a dispute with the cra`s and the ico.

 

Hi

I am in similar position with Mini credit, they dont do a great job of providing methods of contacting them - How would i send a letter to the Data Controller and what is their responsibility ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...