Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I have found this group very helpful hence I am here seeking help and advice.   I got myself into a situation where I have now more than £50k in unsecured debts (personal loans & credit cards) and things are now getting out of control as I am struggling to make payments. This is purely my own created situation and I am taking 100% responsibility for it. I am keen to get out of this situation as soon as possible hence I would appreciate any help and advice in this process. I am employed at the moment and don’t want to risk going into IVA or bankruptcy as this would risk losing my job. Being sole bread earner of my family, I cannot afford to lose my job. I have been trying to keep up with the payments so far and had few missed payments instances until 3/4 months ago but got caught up with missed payments somehow using my savings. All my debts are still with original lenders. However I know I am getting into same situation again shortly and won’t be able to get out of it again. I have started exploring Debt Management Plan (DMP) option through StepChange but haven’t submitted it yet. Based on budgeting, I have around £820 available to make payments to all lenders after taking care of all other essential expenses. This is definitely lot more affordable than what I am currently paying to different lenders. 1. Is DMP right option for me in current situation? 2. what are the negative consequences of availing DMP? 3. is there something else that I can do to get out of this situation? I’m determined to clear out all my debts but need bit of breathing space and time. Let me know please if you need any additional information. Thanks in advance for all your help and guidance. MM  
    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is It Always Worth Suing The NHS?


Followme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

These everyone seems to want to sue everyone else for minor injuries just to get some cash. But if the NHS done something minor, but a company told you to sue, would you?

 

For instance, you are in hospital and they leave the drip on high into your hand and it swells up twice the size. It's very painful, and the staff don't seem to be bothered and just leave you. Hours later the shift changes and the first nurse in quickly turns the drip off. It then takes over 24hrs for the swelling and pain to go away.

 

Now some people may try and sue for that and would probably get a few hundred quid, however I wouldn't even think about it. It would be another matter if I'd lost the hand , but it was only a 24hr issue and mistakes are made.

 

I look at suing the NHS as taking away treatment from someone else, and so would only use it as an option in the most serious of cases.

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

These everyone seems to want to sue everyone else for minor injuries just to get some cash. But if the NHS done something minor, but a company told you to sue, would you?

 

For instance, you are in hospital and they leave the drip on high into your hand and it swells up twice the size. It's very painful, and the staff don't seem to be bothered and just leave you. Hours later the shift changes and the first nurse in quickly turns the drip off. It then takes over 24hrs for the swelling and pain to go away.

 

Now some people may try and sue for that and would probably get a few hundred quid, however I wouldn't even think about it. It would be another matter if I'd lost the hand , but it was only a 24hr issue and mistakes are made.

 

I look at suing the NHS as taking away treatment from someone else, and so would only use it as an option in the most serious of cases.

 

What do you think?

 

I think there are 2 main groups of people who sue.

 

1) Those who have at best a mediocre complaint but who are determined to sue no matter what.

 

2) Those who sue in desperation after not receiving an apology or explanation, or a reasonable offer to "make things better or right" - who have felt fobbed off or ignored, or who don't want to sue but feel that nothing will change to avoid the same happening to someone else unless they sue.

 

Neither should have to sue : the first should be dealt with by a robust defence, and the second should be better treated to avoid the need to litigate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont see the point in suing the NHS, the general public fund it so you'll be taking tax payers money, and most the staff work under such stressful conditions mistakes are bound to happen now and again. What do you expect to happen in a building full of hundreds of sick people.Morally I reckon it would be wrong to sue over minor things but when major accidents occur then sometimes lessons can be learnt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont see the point in suing the NHS, the general public fund it so you'll be taking tax payers money, and most the staff work under such stressful conditions mistakes are bound to happen now and again. What do you expect to happen in a building full of hundreds of sick people.Morally I reckon it would be wrong to sue over minor things but when major accidents occur then sometimes lessons can be learnt.

 

If a mistake is made, the NHS has a duty to make it right if possible. If not possible, then compensation to mitigate the detriment should be offered.

If a mistake by the NHS put you in a wheelchair, why should you not get compensation to mean you get housed in a bungalow with adaptations to limit the effect on you?.

It might not give you back the use of your legs, it might be that no one deliberately or carelessly made a mistake, but why shouldn't the NHS do what it can to make a bad situation less bad (not 'good', not 'better', but 'less bad')

 

As an organisation, the NHS should be better at admitting mistakes, preventing them recurring, and dealing with their effects.

 

If it was more robust at rejecting the "chancers" while better at dealing with those with justifiable complaints : less litigation would be needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are 2 main groups of people who sue.

 

1) Those who have at best a mediocre complaint but who are determined to sue no matter what.

 

I used to know someone like this. She tried (can't remember the outcome) to sue the NHS for not giving her an x-ray, which apparently led to her developing a tissue disorder or something. And she always sues when she has a car accident.

 

People like her give genuine people a bad name. I used to know someone whose parents sued the NHS. They knew that she has cerebral palsy and she was starved of oxygen at birth, which left her severely disabled. In her case, I can understand suing the NHS.

 

and most the staff work under such stressful conditions mistakes are bound to happen now and again.

 

That's no excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Followme.

An interesting debate.

 

These everyone seems to want to sue everyone else for minor injuries just to get some cash. But if the NHS done something minor, but a company told you to sue, would you? Who was the company and what would they get out of it? Probably a fat commission should you succeed.

 

For instance, you are in hospital and they leave the drip on high into your hand and it swells up twice the size. It's very painful, and the staff don't seem to be bothered and just leave you. Were the staff informed that there was pain and swelling from this?

Hours later the shift changes and the first nurse in quickly turns the drip off. It then takes over 24hrs for the swelling and pain to go away.

 

Certain fluids and medication can cause serious harm to tissues if extravisation happens ( where the fluid leaks into the tissues and not flows into a patent and secure vein).

Extravisation can not only cause pain and swelling of a limb but also potentially permanent tissue damage. At the worst scenario extravisation can cause death of tissue and the need for amputation.

 

Swelling can be reduced by elevating the limb and allowing the fluid to disperse. There are emergency procedures for extravistation caused by vesicant medication that could potentially cause tissue damage. These sorts of medication would only be used in specialist units with specially trained staff to monitor.

 

Now some people may try and sue for that and would probably get a few hundred quid, Is it the aim of suing to get "a few quid"? however I wouldn't even think about it. It would be another matter if I'd lost the hand , but it was only a 24hr issue and mistakes are made. Sadly they do but we are all human. Maybe we need to break this constant blame culture.

 

I look at suing the NHS as taking away treatment from someone else, and so would only use it as an option in the most serious of cases.

 

What do you think?

 

I think that if you have a genuine concern then take it up with the staff AT THE TIME OF DISCOVERY. Allow them to redress what has happened and try to put things right, to allow for an explanation for what has happened and to apologise.

People who have concerns have every right to speak out AT THAT TIME. Don't leave it 3 months after getting home and talking to friends who advise suing for money.

Speak to the Hospital LIASE or PALS staff.

 

Incident forms ARE completed for incidents and Root Cause Analysis procedures break down the flow of the incident to identify where the errors happened and what can be changed to prevent it happening again.

 

We all deserve and expect the NHS to work when we or friends and family are sick. Short staffing will always be the biggest battle to acheive but we are all desperately trying to acheive this.

The lifting of the Wistleblowing Clause may make a start but staff are still intimidated that they may loose their job.

Unions are fighting but progress is slow.

  • Haha 1

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...