Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
    • Have to attend the hearing and present evidence of his financial position (income & expenditure) and  statements ,and agree an acceptable payment plan with the judges guidance.  It will be a form of redetermination hearing as already stated.The court will not agree to bailiffs if the financials do not reflect it or assetts are minimal. They just want to determine his true affordable disposable monthly figure....which will not be £10.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA Nightmare


blondi82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3960 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

 

 

I have been looking around your forums for some time, butnever posted.

 

 

 

This all started for me last march I was on incapacitybenefit and have been for 4 years due to back problems and knee problems, I gotthe form to fill in march.

 

Then Got called in for a medical, they tried to get me tocome in early with 30 minutes notice when I said I couldn’t get there in timethey reluctantly agreed I could keep original appointment.

 

 

 

The medical report was of information that quite frankly theyjust made up. And said I scored o points and should just use a wheel chair andwould be fine.

 

 

 

After my appeal, I called each month to check on thereconsideration, Each time it was done, it wasn’t done, I got the points Ididn’t get the points, letter had been sent out, no notes they didn’t know andwent round in circles with a different answer each time.

 

 

 

Finally February came and I still score 0 points and I amgoing to tribunal.

 

Tribunal was last week it was the most awful experience inmy life.

 

The Judge seemed nice enough but the doctor seemed like hecame from ATOS he grilled me on my walking over and over, made up this reallyodd scenarios.

 

Anyway even after all the grilling, the fact I said Icouldn’t repeatedly walk 50 meters, the letter from doctor, specialist phyisotherapy and Cab all said this too. But they put me down for 100 meters puttingme in the WRAG group. Meaning its all over for me as my partner works.

 

 

 

The judge was willing me to appeal I’m not sure if she wasbeing nice or its some kind of trick to take it all away from me.

 

 

 

Does anyone know if I can appeal the tribunal on the groundI believe the wrong amount of meters has been put down? What classes as a pointof law?

 

 

 

Thanks All

Link to post
Share on other sites

:blondi82:

 

Sorry to hear that a tribunal panel gave you a hard time. You can't appeal the decision over a disagreement as to how far you can repeatedly mobilise.

 

Errors of law include:

 

Mis-interpretation of the law.

Not considering all the evidence.

Some procedural errors with the way a tribunal is conducted.

 

An appeal to the upper tribunal isn't a do it yourself job. Most appellants need help from a welfare rights advisor or a solicitor with experience of benefit issues. I'd ask for the statement of reasons, then find some professional advice if you still want to appeal further.

:spider:

 

Sincerely, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

When you look for legal advice make sure it is one fully trained in Welfare rights, that way you know for certain you are paying someone who knows what they are talking about. Not that I'm saying some solicitors are crap!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Firstly what you need to do is request a statement of reasons for the decision. If you've provided evidence that you can only consistently mobilise less than 50 metres, then it needs to be explained in the statement of reasons why they have chosen the 100 metres descriptor. If it isn't explained, or the explanation is not based on proper evidence or reasoning, then this would be an error of law that you could appealto an upper Tribunal. Get the statement of reasons, and then either get help from a welfare rights rep, or post the SOR (minus identifying info) and I'd be happy to take a look to see if you may have a case.

 

As Margaret says, you will need professional help if you do have a case for UT.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses, I have now sent a request for astatement of reasons.

The bit I just cant get my head round is with all the evidenceplus what I said to them all pointing at 50 meters, even the judge clarifiedthis and repeated it so I cant see how I could have been put down for 100meters, it all sounds so trivial but unfortunately for me it’s the differenceof being in the work related activity group or support group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses, I have now sent a request for astatement of reasons.

The bit I just cant get my head round is with all the evidenceplus what I said to them all pointing at 50 meters, even the judge clarifiedthis and repeated it so I cant see how I could have been put down for 100meters, it all sounds so trivial but unfortunately for me it’s the differenceof being in the work related activity group or support group.

 

It will all come down to the dtatement of reasons. If they put a 'valid' justification for disregarding the evidence for some reason, then you probably won't be able to take things further, but if they can't justify the decision, or fail to justify it, then you may have a case.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks for all your kind Replys, and I am sorry about all the missing spaces I was in such a state when I posted these.

 

How long have you all waited for your statement of reasons?

Mines been over ten weeks now, I contacted them and got told they were working on it, that was over two weeks ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your kind Replys, and I am sorry about all the missing spaces I was in such a state when I posted these.

 

How long have you all waited for your statement of reasons?

Mines been over ten weeks now, I contacted them and got told they were working on it, that was over two weeks ago.

 

Normally takes about 2 to 3 months, but there is quite a backlog with more people asking, so just be patient.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response, that's a very long time. They told me at the tribunal it would be around 6 weeks.

I am not sure what to do next my esa runs out in two weeks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just send in another sick note until they get round to sending you what you asked for.

 

Does seem ridiculous when you are asking for a copy of a document that they should have had at the time of the Tribunal though. It is not a first stage reconsideration of decision....are they aware of that? Things can get muddled, especially these days.:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response, that's a very long time. They told me at the tribunal it would be around 6 weeks.

I am not sure what to do next my esa runs out in two weeks

 

clear.gifSadly, as long as you've chased up the Tribunal's Service, and they've confirmed it's in process, there is little you can do.

 

Appealling to UT, f you have a case, is not a quick process, and you need to resign yourself to that. I know it's not what you want to hear, and I really do sympathise.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just send in another sick note until they get round to sending you what you asked for.

 

Does seem ridiculous when you are asking for a copy of a document that they should have had at the time of the Tribunal though. It is not a first stage reconsideration of decision....are they aware of that? Things can get muddled, especially these days.:|

 

She doesn't need to send sick notes as she's been put in the WRAG group.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...