Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and something for aurora watchers to err watch out for   4 solar flares simultaneously erupt from the sun in rare 'super' explosion — and Earth could be hit by the fallout | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM In the early hours of Tuesday (April 23), quadruple solar flares near-simultaneously exploded from across the sun's surface, and there's...  
    • No......CPR 31.14 does not technically apply to Small Claims Track anyway Reply to defence and defence to counterclaim 15.8  If a claimant files a reply to the defence— (a)the claimant must— (i)file the reply with a directions questionnaire; and (ii)serve the reply on the other parties at the same time as it is filed; and (b)the reply should form one document with any defence to counterclaim, with the defence to counterclaim following the reply, unless the dates on which they are due to be filed differ from one another.
    • Hi. I have been away on holiday I got back today to a letter "Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track" It says I have to complete Small Claims Directions Questionnaire (Form N180) by 22nd April which I haven't done as I was away Suggestions, or is it too late? Thanks
    • So to clear up, you think you've paid this £1200 as part of the £4000, leaving a net overpayment of £2800 (which you don't want back?) Can you provide proof of payment (bank statements for the standing order) showing that you've paid this £4k over? Do you still have to pay for the child currently? In regards to your second query re: PiP it's only a press release right now, nothing has been confirmed. Just remember it's election year so there's no guarantee that the current or any future governments will follow through with it.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi could someone please help?

 

I have had a offer letter for my PPI paid on my house of fraser store card :)

but they are offering me refund of premiums paid plus 8% simple interest per ann

 

here are details

 

start date 01/12/95

End date 13/03/2013

 

perm piad £188.88

simple int £103.35

 

total due £292.23

 

 

now all its great getting a refund but not sure if I am thinking right should I work it out as you would a credit card with the cost of monthly interest rate and so on ?

 

 

Any advice would be great Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thanks for the reply, no I have a few but not a lot I have just mailed Genworth to ask for a breakdown with dates and premiums paid and questioned the interest thing so will see what they say but I have a rough idea on what I have paid which is about right to what they have said its just the interest thing that puzzeled me because I would have had to pay interest every month on my card.

 

Thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ye you are right, you should get the contractual interest back.

 

In summary you should get...

 

1 -> The premiums charged.

 

2 -> Any contractual interest charged as a result of the premiums.

 

3 -> The account should be reconstructed with the above removed and if in any month the reconstructed account shows a credit balance you should get 8% simple interest on that credit balance for that month

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is my reply from Genworth

 

 

Your redress was calculated as follows:

Based on the Premium paid by you of £188.88, policy start date of 01/12/1995, policy end date of 15/03/2013, the monthly premium has been calculated as £0.91. 8% Simple interest is then applied to each individual monthly premium up to the date of the Redress Payment. 20% of the Interest (20% of the 8% Simple Interest) is withheld as the HMRC requires that this be paid directly to them”

 

 

 

the thing is I haven't used the account since about 2001 so how can they say end date 15/03/2013 and also when I contacted Santander over this matter they said they didnt have any details as the account has been closed for so long !!!

 

Any Help thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they mean is that they have stopped the policy form 15th March and calculated the 8% interest on the premiums paid up that date.

 

As far as HMRC goes, it is not a "requirement" as such but some institutions do take 20% basic rate tax off at source so it means that any tax due as a result of that interest has been paid. You will need to declare that n your next tax return so that your tax declarations of income and tax paid are correct.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your reply.

 

Does how they have paid the interest sound about right to you ? or should I say something about not using the account since 2001 or want it make any difference ? also I am a stay at home mum who doesn't work will I still have to pay tax ?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it is Genworth who are offering the refund they will not account for any interest you have paid on the card as a result of the PPI.

 

However, they are giving you a straight 8% on all of the premiums paid running from the date of the premium to 15th March. That is different to the 8% which would be offered if it were done as in post #4 above since you would have only got 8% interest for the months when the account was in credit.

 

Given the age of the account, I would suggest that the way they have done this is not a bad result and if it were me I would take it.

 

As regards the tax, you will need to contact HMRC since if you are due a refund of this tax then they will be the one to action that.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...