Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
-
Posts
-
Oh sorry.. yes he had paid 4K into the account this was in his words to show he was being genuine and would require it back when he brought the car but to date he still has not delivered , no contact since.. -
The post that I included the link for completing the N180. You really need to speak to MCOL though and ask why the delay of 9 months and did the claimant make application to lift the stay. Your defence was submitted/rec 19th Aug 2020...therefore the claim must have been stayed as from 22nd Sept 2020. . -
I am afraid that you are making it more complicated than it need be, you keep repeating what he has texted and we have no definitive chronology. You have not answered my post #66 although I suspect that the £4k has NOT been paid into your bank account and he is merely stringing you along. -
Claim Status on moneyclaim online A claim was issued against you on 17/07/2019 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 21/07/2019 at 17:35:23 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 22/07/2019 at 08:05:35 Your defence was submitted on 16/08/2019 at 19:04:47 Your defence was received on 19/08/2019 at 01:09:24 DQ sent to you on 17/04/2021 DQ filed by claimant on 17/04/2021 My Defence was filed as I assert that I am not liable to the Claimant for the sum claimed nor any amount at all for the following reasons, any one of which is fatal to the Claimant's case. 1. The contravention didn’t occur 2. The claim is for breach of contract. However, it is denied any contract existed 3. The Claimant has no standing to bring a case So I'm completing the form on post 60 (not 61?) . In have this with my letter. -
Some real track and tracing by transparency org re the VIP Tory pal lanes https://www.transparency.org.uk/track-and-trace-uk-PPE-procurement-corruption-risk-VIP-lane-research * £255m of contracts awarded to companies that had only been incorporated within the previous 60 days * around 20% of the companies awarded contracts without tender or clearly proper scutiny had 'red flags' which would have required extra vetting in normal processes etc etc add to that the prior linked * 27 million pounds to a middleman for PPE * Hancocks plastic fast food carton/plastic coffee cup company mate getting multi £million contract to supply medical grade equipment * vast amounts of the PPE purchsed under these deals being flagged as not meeting required standards by customs ...
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Our picks
-
Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged"- **Judgment for Conversion of destroyed item. **WON**
hellothere124 posted a topic in Postal and Delivery Services,
Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347-
- 32 replies
-
-
Post in Bailiffs in at BBC obtain 7 years interest on overpayment of TV licence
Its WAR posted a post in a topic,
I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
-
-
Post in Court Claim Against Hermes - item sent via Packlink was lost/tampered with **WON at mediation full amount **
jj58 posted a post in a topic,
Hi @BankFodder
Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them.
In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
Picked By
BankFodder, -
-
***Hermes and mediation hints ***
BankFodder posted a topic in Postal and Delivery Services,
Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003-
- 1 reply
Picked By
BankFodder, -
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 2949 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Recommended Posts