Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dubai Debt through UK Courts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Roysto and welcome to CAG

 

Unless litigation has actually commenced then you have posted in the wrong forum.

 

Thread moved to Overseas :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?385979-Dubai-Debt-through-UK-Courts(10-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved back to Legal

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could provide details of their Particulars and a little background history and basis of your proposed defence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok responding to a PM that contains all details so far.

 

 

AoS and contest jurisdiction...you must then submit an application notice (N244) within 14 days with your supported evidence as to why.When ever a Solicitor tells you not do do something and then threatens with costs its a safe bet that it will damage his claim.:wink:

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a Dubai Credit Card Debt that was established between 2007-2008

 

The debt at default stood at around £7k and I have dealt with the bank, bank's dubai lawyers, uk dca's and now uk solicitor over the last 5 years.

I have always tried to settle but they always increased the debt significantly and would only accept a one off payment.

 

Two weeks ago I received a county court claim through Northampton for £55k or x8 the original debt without it being particularised.

The Terms and Conditions (2013) provided are a direct print from the banks website and states that the claim is to be governed by UAE law under the non exclusive jurisdiction of Dubai.

 

Legal fees for both parties are estimated to be £30-50k.

the UK solicitor claims that they have successfully contested 20 similar judgements in the last 3 months and recommend that I should settle close to the amount claimed to avoid a judgement for double (legal fees incl.) furthermore they planned to take a charging order on my uk property and force the sell of the house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok responding to a PM that contains all details so far.

 

 

AoS and contest jurisdiction...you must then submit an application notice (N244) within 14 days with your supported evidence as to why.When ever a Solicitor tells you not do do something and then threatens with costs its a safe bet that it will damage his claim.:wink:

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Sorry for ignorance.....AoS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could check your dates Roysto as to when in 2008 you defaulted... Im pretty sure the statute of Limitations is 5 years under Commercial Code Article 638.

 

AoS Acknowledgement of Service.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately default was Oct 2008 and the 5 years wouldn't apply.

However they are applying UAE law to this case and therefore the statute of limitations is unknown.

All I know is that for cheques it is 3 years in UAE.

 

I had to provide a blank, signed, security cheque and this would have been deposited on default to cover the whole debt + costs.

This cheque would have been referred to drawer and under UAE law a legal case would be created at this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My personal view is that it would be difficult for you to argue against jurisdiction in this case.

Under English law the starting position is that people who are present in England can be sued through the English courts.

If you want to dispute jurisdiction the burden of proof is on the defendant to make a case for what is known as forum non conveniens, which is saying that there is another country where the case should be heard instead.

 

 

Although there is a jurisdiction clause in favour of Dubai, it is non-exclusive which means the bank can still sue in other countries.

As you do not live in the UAE anymore then I think it will be difficult to claim that the Dubai courts are a more appropriate place for this litigation. It doesn't make sense for you to go back and forth to Dubai for hearings plus the claimant would then have to go through a recognition process before enforcing a UAE judgment in England.

 

You could always have a crack at contesting jurisdiction on the basis that it is easier for the UAE courts to apply UAE law, thus avoiding any need for the English courts to hear expert evidence on UAE law.

 

 

Personally I think this argument is weak unless you can identify some genuine argument of UAE law that you might want to run.

If you do contest jurisdiction you need to be aware of the risk that there may be a preliminary hearing about jurisdiction and if you lose at that hearing you may be ordered to pay the legal costs of that hearing.

 

If you want to read about the legal basis for what I am saying, have a look at the leading judgment in this area - http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1986/10.html - specifically paragraph 5 of Lord Goff's judgment.

 

Personally I would be inclined to drop the jurisdiction point and treat this as a normal credit card claim.

However the difficulty is that you will not be protected by UK consumer protection legislation which will reduce the number of arguments you can raise.

 

 

The UAE has very little in the way of consumer protection (people get arrested by the police for not paying their mobile phone bill) and the UAE Civil Code is very brief, although I can probably dig up an English copy of it.

 

 

It certainly sounds like you need to be disputing the level of the costs and perhaps seeking an order for them to particularise their POC on this point, do you know if they are relying on a clause in the agreement making you liable for their legal costs?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

However they are applying UAE law to this case and therefore the statute of limitations is unknown. All I know is that for cheques it is 3 years in UAE. I had to provide a blank, signed, security cheque and this would have been deposited on default to cover the whole debt + costs. This cheque would have been referred to drawer and under UAE law a legal case would be created at this time.

 

The general limitation period for most civil claims in the UAE is 15 years. This includes breach of contract claims. There are a number of shorter periods for specific things like cheques and civil wrongs but unfortunately I think a credit card debt would fall under the general 15-year limit. I think I have an English translation of the UAE Civil Code on my work PC, I will try to dig it out for you tomorrow.

 

Another point: are you being pursued by the bank itself or by DCAs? If memory serves it is not straightforward to assign debts under UAE law. If it is a DCA then we can think about challenging them on the assignment.

 

If you have lived in the UAE you probably know this already but it is worth repeating. Under UAE law failing to honour a check is a criminal offence. If you ever return to the UAE - including stopovers in the airport - there is a good chance that you will be arrested by UAE police when you land. The UAE banks (including UAE branches of international banks) effectively use the police as debt collectors. This sounds ridiculous to Europeans but that is how the UAE works.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly on jurisdiction. The T&C's attached to the claim or printed directly from the banks website. The bank has in fact merged and changed name since I originally signed the credit card agreement. They have certainly not provided the original T&C.

 

Secondly, I am not aware if they are relying on any particular clause in the agreement concerning legal fee costs and at this point the actual agreement has not been provided. There is a lot of paperwork attached to the claim but only one piece is relevant to me being a signature on an application page. It looks like a cut and paste job lot for the claimants solicitor with name and amount changes.

 

Finally, agreed....the claim would need to be particularised.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a bunch of jokers. Would love to hear from anyone who disagrees but personally I would be tempted to file a defence and then apply for an unless order requiring them to provide better particulars in default of which the claim is to be struck out.

 

If they still don't comply and don't provide a contractual basis for claiming the additional costs then perhaps apply for summary judgment on the charges.

 

you could have the SJ application heard at a CMC, and if the SJ application is granted you would have a shot at staying in the small claims track as the claim would then be under 10k.

The advantage of being in small claims is you are much less likely to be ordered to pay legal costs.

 

Please remember the small claims limit only increases to 10k for defences filed after 1 April, so don't file your defence until then (but staying within the time limits - remember, 14 days to serve defence but you can get an extra 14 days if you file an AOS indicating an intention to defend).

 

Remember that if you file a defence you will automatically be deemed to have accepted jurisdiction. If you do want to contest jurisdiction then you must first file an AOS ticking the box to contest jurisdiction, and then follow up with an application as stated by andyorch.

 

Perhaps worth writing to them and offering to pay the original debt of 7k in full and final settlement of all their claims if you do not really have any grounds for disputing the original debt?

Edited by steampowered

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference, here is an English translation of the UAE Civil Code. Not sure it will help that much but you might need it later.

 

Let us know what you want to do and what help you need. I guess you now need to decide whether you want to contest jurisdiction and take the costs risk associated with that, or whether you want to accept jurisdiction and dispute the additional costs.

Edited by steampowered

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steampowered

 

I thought that I had read that only the High Court can consider claims that originate out of jurisdiction. In the legislation that allows for foreign claim to be heard in UK courts, I thought that the legislation normally specifically lists the UK's High Court ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

You are on the right lines. Under the Civil Procedure Rules applications to enforce a foreign judgment or arbitration award must be made in the High Court. However, this would not apply when you are actually litigating the claim in the English courts. I believe new claims can still be heard by the County Court even though they might concern events from another country.

Edited by steampowered

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For future reference, here is an English translation of the UAE Civil Code. Not sure it will help that much but you might need it later.

 

Let us know what you want to do and what help you need. I guess you now need to decide whether you want to contest jurisdiction and take the costs risk associated with that, or whether you want to accept jurisdiction and dispute the additional costs.

 

thanks for providing this, looks like a long read :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps hire a Dubai Solicitor Roysto to explain it to the English courts ?:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...
Can anyone provide advice on the thread title, please confirm and I will provide chapter and verse through private message to ensure I do not prejudice my case

 

Many Thanks in advance

Hi Roysto11, I am new to this site. Can you let me know what happened in your case as I am in the same predicament. I would appreciate any help you can give me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...