Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Prices had already risen in expectation of action, with Brent crude near a six-month high last week.View the full article
    • Thanks everyone. Will speak with the manager first chance I get later today and let you know.
    • own topic created  tnx the info. dx  
    • this debt: MBNA Bank of Scotland Card debt- LInk got a CCJ - now want payment review - MBNA - Consumer Action Group and a barclaycard loan - did you ever send the a CCA in all these years.....when was it taken out?    
    • Welcome to the Forum. The PCN must be subject to Bye laws as the warning near the bottom of the PCN does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9 [2][f[] of the Act it should say: (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver ,the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Their version states they are pursuing you as the driver [because of the Bye laws they cannot transfer the liability from the driver to the keeper] even though you are the keeper. Should it go to Court Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Obviously on many occasions another member of the family may be driving instead of the keeper. Indeed anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your car. if any of the three cars were not driven by the keeper they are not liable to pay the PCN only the driver is.  as long as they do not divulge who was driving those lovely people at Alliance haven't a hope of winning against them in Court. What a shame. However while those keepers who were not driving are in the clear all is not lost for the other keeper drivers. Alliance still have to prove who was driving which is difficult providing those keepers do not appeal.  It is quite often that on appeal the keeper may say "I entered the car park at....."  immediately giving away that they were the driver. Plus even if you appeal it won't be accepted as a] they lose £100 straight away and b] mostly all the major car parking companies are dishonest scrotes. In the meantime you will be on the receiving end of threatening letters from Alliance, unregulated debt collectors and fifth, sixth or even lower rated solicitors all trying to frighten the life out of you to cough up. They can all be safely ignored since if you don't contact any of them they don't know who was driving so have no information that the can use in Court to identify the driver. Some time in the future they may send you a Letter of Claim which must not be ignored. Just let us know and we will advise a suitable snotty letter to send them which will show that you are not afraid of them and are happy to turn up in court knowing that you will win. Sorry it was a bit long winded.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PLeaaase Help JSA Sanctioned?...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There Guys, On The Friday 8th March 2013, I Received a letter of the JSA/DWP Saying that they made a decision not to pay me until May 2013, For A Job that I Didn't apply for.

 

Anyway, Jobcentre never gave me a Job to apply for, neither there wasn't a Job saved on my Government GateAway Account. So on Monday 11th March 2013, I Went to my local Jobcentre Plus and spoke to some lady who looked it up, It came back As I didn't apply for a Job At Asda.... Now I can Remember, My Person Adviser asked me If I wanted to do a Online test first at a collage and i said Yes I will... So I Phoned Up the collage and booked an appointment, but they never phoned me back... Also I had to do a Hardship Payment application.. ( STILL HAVEN'T HEARD BACK OF THEM).

 

Wednesday 13th March, I Signed On As Normal,

Today I Had a Adviser Meeting.. She said my account has been Sanctioned!!...

 

Anyway... Before this letter, I had no warning that my account will get Sanctioned, No-one told me nothing about it. Basically I did apply for the Job at asda because I told my Adviser that I will go Collage(Part of the Job)..

 

No Warning That My account will get Sanctioned

Can They send out a letter and tell you they going stop your JSA, without a WARNING?

 

Do you know any advise I can get from you Guys?

What to do?

 

Have you got a Letter template i could use for a MP Etc?..

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, and welcome to CAG. I'll move this post to the Benefits Forum where you should get more responses.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to request a reconsideration of the decision and you may be able to apply for hardship pending that decision.

I the reconsideration you need to state exactly what happened and if unsuccessful you wish the reconsideration to escalate to an appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there guys on the 5th March 2013 I received a letter from DWP Saying This " We have looked at your claim following a recent change".

 

"This is because we recently told you that a Decision would be made about a doubt"

 

On whether you failed to take advantage of a Job opportunity with VACANCY 1143059. I NEVER GOT THIS JOB VACANCY OF THE JOBCENTRE NOR IT WASN'T ON MY GOVERNMENT GATEWAY ACCOUNT!?

 

My Personal advisro, Didn't know anything about this

I've done A Hardship Payment Application which I Still haven't heard back.

 

What I Can do?.. I Need Money,

Today I Should of got paid, But never did.

 

Please Help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've moved this thread to the appropriate Forum, you should get some help shortly.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

No JCP are not having to refer people for sanctions to meet targets.

The Governmet would probably like to put targets or benchmarks as they like to call them now but they can't as there has to be a reason for referring to DMA (the decision making appeal team that look at guidance and regualtions to determine if a sanction can and should be applied).

 

With the hardship decision it will depend if your local JCP office hold hardship interviews or not (some smaller offices don't interview clients who have been sanctioned) and if you have provided all the information needed.

A decision is usually made within 2 working days.

The vacancy identified doesn't have to be on your governnent gateway either as vacancies can be found on other sites and you can be advised tof the positions and expected to apply for them if identified by your advisor.

Are you single, part of a couple, children living with you if yes how many do you have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...