Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MOTOR MILE FINANCE ( E-Mail)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3774 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

Out of the blue today received an E-Mail from mmf Nationwide Doorstep & Legal Collection Specialists, re an alleged debt to Uncle Buck. Circa £200.

 

One of our Doorstep Agents will shortly be attending your property and this is a formal request for you to provide an agreed appointment time and date, failing which, our agent will have no option other than to arrive unannounced.

PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MATTER AS COSTS AND INTEREST WILL SHORTLY START TO BE ADDED TO THE ACCOUNT BALANCE AND WILL GREATLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY.

 

Please contact us urgently on 01138 876876

 

 

 

 

 

Yours Faithfully,

Doorstep Collections Dept.

Motormile Finance UK Ltd

 

I have read several threads re them and their threatogrammes but need further advice/info on the best way to respond/react to their initial E-Mail as above.

All advice/info will be as usual gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look in the library. There is a doorstep letter in there somewhere. (sorry posting from phone do can't provide link)

 

The letter tells them they are only allowed to visit by appointment and then goes on to say that since you won't be making an appointment any time soon then not to bother turning up on your doorstep.

 

These clowns did actually turn up on my doorstep. I just had someone tell them to clear off. I then sent the doorstep letter and they never bothered again.

It never rains but it pours...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bombayix,

Thank you for your input.

 

I have the Doorstop Call letter on hand as I have had to use it on other DCAs, by sending by signed for delivery with Royal Mail.mmf seem to be very aggresive in their Threatogramme E-Mails etc.

 

Not sure I should enter into a game of E-Mail tennis with them?

Any further advice/info will as usual be gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

First of all are MMF collecting on behalf of Nationwide or have they purchased the debt? If MMF have purchased the debt you should have received a Notice of Assignment (N.O.A.).

 

When did you last make a payment? Over six years (five years if you live in Scotland) with no payment and the debt is Statute Barred.

What is the debt from Nationwide for? Credit Card / Loan / Overdraft ???

 

As usual if anyone does turn up, tell them to leave your property immediately, they have no legal right to be on it and call the Police if they refuse to move.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stigman,

Its mmf (MotorMile Finance UK Ltd,) CAG has highlighted it as "Nationwide"

E-Mail received today out of the blue and as stated above #1. Nothing received from Pay day co re assignment.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

I'd personally wait until they send you something by post.

 

Only once you have received something made from a tree you can act accordingly.

 

Until then, I would personally ignore but keep the email in-case you ever need to refer to it.

 

Usual CAG rules apply, if they phone, do not answer any security questions and just say "in writing only" and hang up, you can also laugh and blow raspberries if you so desire!

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello All,

 

Letter from mmf received today.after sending them the NO Doorstep Callers Letter by Rec. signed for del.

 

Thank you for your recent letter dated ** March 2013, regarding your account with us.( What acc mmf?)

I understand you have decided to revoke your doorstep licence and also that you would like us to remove any contact telephone numbers we hold for you. (Not in my request letter, but thank you)

 

Firstly, I feel it is important to note that the contact information we hold for you was provided to us from Uncle Buck.who issued you the loan. Uncle Buck obtained the information directly from you during the application process. I can confirm that the details we hold for you have now been removed from our records.

 

In relation to your notification of your revocation of the doorstep licence regarding our intention to send an agent to your home to discuss the debt. I can confirm that we are fully aware of this and we ensure that we fully comply with the OFT guidance regarding debt collection and visits by Agents. You are not correct in your assertion that, under OFT rules we can only call at your home if you agree to make an appointment. The debt is not reasonably disputed or deadlocked and we are giving you reasonable notice of the timing of the intended visit.

 

In Law a creditor is in a different position to a postman or a member of the public asking directions. When you took this loan you impliedly agreed that the creditor could communicate with you to discuss repayment. You do not have the contractual right to revoke that agreement until the loan has been repaid. Yet you have frustrated our attempts to discuss the matter with us either by letter or telephone.

 

We will not disregard any reasonable requests you make as to the timing or method by which we have those discussions. Unless we hear further from you with such a request , we therefore give you notice that our agent will be calling at your home address to discuss repayment of this loan.

 

Alternatively please contact us on 08009961103 and quote the above reference number to arrange a repayment plan for the outstanding balances, or to discuss a settlement. Our collections department is available between 8am and 8pm Monday to Thursday 8am to 6pm Friday and 9am to 12pm Saturday.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Barry Ellershaw

Customer Relations Officer

Email [email protected]

 

All advice comments and information will as usual be gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barry has used words like these before but he still hasn't got the hang of it. If anyone visits you at your home you don't have to let him/her/it in. You are not "contractually obliged" as per the loan agreement to even talk to their agent. They appear to have not yet proved to you they have the right to collect this alleged debt. If/when their muppet calls round ask him to identify themselves, make a note of it, and then tell em to sling his hook.

 

The same advice applies - do not phone them, if you to contact them you will write and they must repond in writing. get them to practice their best joined up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not personally in favour of the 'revocation of licence' approach to threats of doorsteppers.

 

In my view it is better to send them something like this:

I refer to your email dated xxxxx, the content of which is noted.

 

Take notice that I do not agree to any agent of your company, or of any other company you claim to represent, or claiming to represent you, calling at my home at any time. I am aware that the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on Debt Collection makes clear that any caller must leave at once if asked to do so. Consequently the only way in which I will engage with a caller is to instruct him to leave immediately. Failure to comply will result in the police being called, and a formal complaint to the Office of Fair Trading.

 

Any communication from you in this matter must be in writing.

 

I trust that my position is now entirely clear; if you do not understand any part of this letter, you should seek professional advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I trust that my position is now entirely clear; if you do not understand any part of this letter, you should seek professional advice.

 

I like it but prefer my version.

 

"... if you do not understand any part of this letter, I suggest you seek out someone in the office who is not a Moron, Cretin or Imbecile (I know it will be difficult, but try). Try to find someone with an IQ above 50, they may be able to help you get the general drift if not a complete understanding."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Letter from mmf received today.after sending them the NO Doorstep Callers Letter by Rec. signed for del.

 

Thank you for your recent letter dated ** March 2013, regarding your account with us.( What acc mmf?)

I understand you have decided to revoke your doorstep licence and also that you would like us to remove any contact telephone numbers we hold for you. (Not in my request letter, but thank you)

 

Firstly, I feel it is important to note that the contact information we hold for you was provided to us from Uncle Buck.who issued you the loan. Uncle Buck obtained the information directly from you during the application process. I can confirm that the details we hold for you have now been removed from our records.

 

In relation to your notification of your revocation of the doorstep licence regarding our intention to send an agent to your home to discuss the debt. I can confirm that we are fully aware of this and we ensure that we fully comply with the OFT guidance regarding debt collection and visits by Agents. You are not correct in your assertion that, under OFT rules we can only call at your home if you agree to make an appointment. The debt is not reasonably disputed or deadlocked and we are giving you reasonable notice of the timing of the intended visit. Just because they dont consider the debt disputed, does not mean that it isnt.. by you.

 

In Law a creditor is in a different position to a postman or a member of the public asking directions. When you took this loan you impliedly agreed that the creditor could communicate with you to discuss repayment. You do not have the contractual right to revoke that agreement until the loan has been repaid. Yet you have frustrated our attempts to discuss the matter with us either by letter or telephone.

 

Ask them to provide the law/regulations that provides a creditor with this right. Also request from them the clause / section of the contract that allows for them to simply turn up on the doorstep !

 

We will not disregard any reasonable requests you make as to the timing or method by which we have those discussions. Unless we hear further from you with such a request , we therefore give you notice that our agent will be calling at your home address to discuss repayment of this loan.

 

Alternatively please contact us on 08009961103 and quote the above reference number to arrange a repayment plan for the outstanding balances, or to discuss a settlement. Our collections department is available between 8am and 8pm Monday to Thursday 8am to 6pm Friday and 9am to 12pm Saturday.

 

We look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Barry Ellershaw

Customer Relations Officer

Email [email protected]

 

All advice comments and information will as usual be gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

I am not personally in favour of the 'revocation of licence' approach to threats of doorsteppers.

 

 

I refer to your email dated xxxxx, the content of which is noted.

 

Take notice that I do not agree to any agent of your company, or of any other company you claim to represent, or claiming to represent you, calling at my home at any time. I am aware that the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collectionlink3.gif makes clear that any caller must leave at once if asked to do so. Consequently the only way in which I will engage with a caller is to instruct him to leave immediately. Failure to comply will result in the police being called, and a formal complaint to the Office of Fair Trading.

 

Any communication from you in this matter must be in writing.

 

I trust that my position is now entirely clear; if you do not understand any part of this letter, you should seek professional advice.

 

 

 

In my view it is better to send them something like this:

 

I like SP's short and sharp letter, it gives them nothing to argue over or to worry their tiny little brains trying to find something waffly in which to attempt to confuse the debtor.

 

It is my legal right to communicate in writing under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and prevents any misunderstanding.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Thank you very much for all of the swift replies, I appreciate them very much.

I will take on board and re post with any replies from them.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Edited by JGJ
Link to post
Share on other sites

The response you received that starts 'You are not correct in your assertion that, under OFT rules we can only call at your home if you agree to make an appointment. etc...' is exactly, word-for-word, the same response i got from credit solutions/power2contact regarding a mobile phone debt. Im thinking that this is now just another template that dca's are using as a response. Maybe they managed to organise a meeting. lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a letter from the CSA telling me they were making motormouth aware that they could only visit by mutually agreed appointment. Its seems that mm are still in need of a good spanking. I feel that everyone who gets that letter should email credit fitness at the OFT. Seems that nothing has changed since rob sands has taken over.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hello All,

 

E-Mail arrived this morning from MMF.

 

Subject: Please contact MMF

 

Dear Ms.

REF;

 

We are attempting to contact the above named person regarding a personal matter. We have been provided with this email

address as being the possible address for our subject.

 

Therefore if you are the person named above, then please contact our office immediately on telephone number 0844 770 9583 quoting the reference number if, however, you are not the person named above and/or have any information regarding the persons whereabouts, then please contact our investigation team, in confidence, on the alternative telephone number or email address below.

 

Yours faithfully

MotorMile Finance UK Ltd.

 

Speculative message or what, are they really allowed to get away with this??

 

All comments advice/info will be as usual gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

sillygirl1,

 

Thank you for your reply, complaints on there way.

You are so right, if we all put our complaints into the relevant authorities, we would have a much quieter time.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sillygirl , with respect that is no different to a letter. If that is all they have been given then yes they can send that sort of letter. If however you have already replied and stated that you do not know this person, then that is very different.

 

I would just ignore until you get something in writing.

 

Oh BTW inEngland you can not contact trading standards , you have to go through the replacement for consumer direct

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello All,

 

Since sending them the" NO Doorstepping Letter" and receiving their reply as at #9, all has been quiet until today another of their "Notice of Potential Action" letters arrived.

 

This one stating again if you do not provide re-payment proposals within 5 days we reserve the right to to pass this matter to our "HOME VISIT DEPARTMENT" with a view to assessing your finances and living standards.

 

All comments/advice/info will as usual be gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...