Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Would like you to post it in PDF format please. If you use the app Adobe scan then you will be able to do this. There are other apps which can also produce single file multipage PDFs.
    • Hi there. Unfortunately not. Apparently the incident was supposed to have happened on 4th Feb 2021 at 6 something in the morning. I was probably asleep at that time. Card transactions are on the statement on the 4th Feb but are from 3rd of Feb when the transactions took place. Nothing on the 4th of Feb. Although I had another car hire during that time so it would be absurd to even claim that anyone would rent multiple cars concurrently for months at a time. On top of that, whilst going through my statements, there was no payment to these guys so there is no way they'd rent a car to someone without paying a deposit or the rental fee. It's nonsense.       Hi there pal. Will check to see if they have a website now. Not sure but worried that if they'd go to the lengths of lying to the police they'd try to forge hire agreements with myself based on an old on. What they won't be able to do is provide any evidence that they took any deposit or payment from me for that vehicle or any vehicle for that matter in the time leading up to the incident. I will see about sending the SAR to them.   For the Claim form, I didn't know how to turn it into a pdf using my phone so I've taken photos of it and removed my identifying information.                 Total costs for the Claim are 10110 including 410 for Court Fees, so not sure if it's really considered as 10k or not With regards to time, I will start a list now on notes. Thanks.   I have attached the document they sent me regarding the other driver. I have removed some of his identifying info as well as he may be just another victim of these guys. The document isn't signed by anyone.   Basically when the police letter came I phone the son who's number I had multiple times and he told me it's ok, don't worry, he will sort it etc. Eventually he stopped answering my calls, so I sent him so many texts telling him to answer etc. Eventually he answered I yelled at him for using my details like that then told him I'd report him to the police if he didn't fix this. He said there must have been a mistake and that he knows someone else was hiring the vehicle. He then sent me a message on my phone with the details of the person who he claims was driving but does not put anything else in writing regarding this. I then use this to submit the information to the police regarding the incident.   I don't know what the police are doing about this. I attached the document they sent me regarding the driver (albeit it is something with no signiture that they could have put together themselves) as well as another attachment with a hand written letter explaining the fraud I believe they are committing on me as I did not rent that car from them. Might have to just go to a local police station and file an official report on these guys and their bogus response to the police fingering me out and using that to send me a Claim form. How can they do this if I did not go into their office since my last rental from the more than 6 months ago, I didn't sign any hire agreement (unless they forged one, which I wouldn't put past them), I didn't pay them a deposit or rental fee? There is no reasonable explanation how they can claim they gave a car to someone with none of the above. It's absurd.   thanks for the responses everyone.  
    • That's whet the yhellow card is for, they need anything that "Might" be linked to vaccine reporting in.
    • Many thanks @dx100uk I'll head over to the site and keep you posted. 
    • yes dx  the same one and 14 years on still paying    UB... thks have filled in online sar request to halifax  what happens if the halifax can not produce evidence of every payment made over the last 20 years off the original balance    i still have the original typed breakdown of the charges and amount house was sold for etc and the original balance  sent by the halifax 20 odd years ago
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

IDS is misleading the public again!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2937 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no one believes a word he says because he can't help but mislead :D

 

 

is there anything this man hasn't been truthful about?! he can rant and and rave all he likes but at the end of the day no one is having any of it..he's just one big fake end off!

 

 

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2291288/Welfare-minister-rages-bishops-Theres-moral-trapping-people-benefits-says-Iain-Duncan-Smith.html

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

no one believes a word he says because he can't help but mislead :D

 

 

is there anything this man hasn't been truthful about?! he can rant and and rave all he likes but at the end of the day no one is having any of it..he's just one big fake end off!

 

 

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2291288/Welfare-minister-rages-bishops-Theres-moral-trapping-people-benefits-says-Iain-Duncan-Smith.html

 

I just find it unbelievable that nobody in the media are asking the obvious question;

 

"Mr Duncan Smith, a devout Roman Catholic, insisted it was neither fair nor moral to trap millions of families on welfare payments which made it not worth their while seeking work."-taken from the daily heil.

 

So why dont they increase the minium wage then?

 

If george duncan smith and his elite tory millionairs think that cutting benefits will help already poor and struggling families into work then they are wrong.

Surely it would make sense to increase the minium wage, or have a living wage as they call it.

 

Why?

Because it would make working worthwhile.

It would bring more families out of poverty.

People would not need so many working benefits to top up their income to be able to just about live.

This would save the tax payers millions and stop us tax payers from subsidising employers who pay rubbish wages.

Higher wages for peasents means more spending in britain as opposed to higher wages for millionairs who mainly invest or spend abroad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there aren't even many jobs to go for with thousands going for a few jobs, same with this bedroom tax situation when there isn't available smaller accommodation for a lot of people to move into, so their stuck. as usual with the tories its to hell with the poor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is significant government thinking that the NMW actually increases unemployment because employers feel that the bar is set too high, £6.19 per hour is too much to pay out. Of course, employers are bound to state that, because anything above £0.00 per hour eats into profit. Hence workfare.

 

No government have ever set an official poverty line, they always refer to this index, that statistic, GDP, blah blah, and no government ever will because the NMW would have to be set above the line, and so would benefits.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IDS should remember the old saying 'empty vessels make the most noise', this sad pathetic little man shouts because he is frustrated as he knows no one believes a single word that comes out of his mouth!

Edited by joeski
Link to post
Share on other sites
But we still have to put up with it all and suffer....for how long methinks

 

well considering no one takes IDS seriously and we'll probably have more riots when UC is introduced maybe for much not longer (i hope so anyway) :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
There is significant government thinking that the NMW actually increases unemployment because employers feel that the bar is set too high, £6.19 per hour is too much to pay out. Of course, employers are bound to state that, because anything above £0.00 per hour eats into profit. Hence workfare.

 

No government have ever set an official poverty line, they always refer to this index, that statistic, GDP, blah blah, and no government ever will because the NMW would have to be set above the line, and so would benefits.

 

In order to pay the £6.19 per hour, the employer has to raise the cost of their goods to the buyer. The buyer in turn passes this onto the consumer who is the person being paid £6.19. However that consumer person can no longer afford the commodity due to the price increase. A wage increase happens again, price of goods go up further, the consumer person is no better off and so the cycle is repeated. When does it stop? When the employer is paying £100, £200 per hour and with the goods now priced even further out of reach?

Link to post
Share on other sites
But we still have to put up with it all and suffer....for how long methinks

 

It's the old story with tories, they will do as much damage as possible to people at the lower end of the scale to support the wealthy in the knowledge that they will have a very short reign.

 

A perfect example is the fact that they will do anything to preserve the banking bonuses on the basis that if such payments stop it will create a so called brain drain. I can't get my head round this one bearing in mind that it was the banks that caused the financial problems in the past , so who cares if they disappear into the wilderness. In fact why not give them a free transfer to anywhere.

 

There again, how many tories will end up working in these financial institutons when they get kicked out of government.

Link to post
Share on other sites
well I hope so joeski......this lot need outing asap....but wonders who will be any good as a replacement.

 

i personally think they are all the same..we'd be better running the country ourselves without them :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
There is significant government thinking that the NMW actually increases unemployment because employers feel that the bar is set too high, £6.19 per hour is too much to pay out. Of course, employers are bound to state that, because anything above £0.00 per hour eats into profit. Hence workfare.

 

No government have ever set an official poverty line, they always refer to this index, that statistic, GDP, blah blah, and no government ever will because the NMW would have to be set above the line, and so would benefits.

 

I am a long term unemployed and I hate this and the previous govermnment but I'd like to see the NMW abolished. It has created a black market of people willing to work for less and cash in hand. At the moment most jobs in retail and service sectors go to foreign (non EU) students who nominally work part-time but get cash in hand to work full-time. How can you beat that?

 

I'd like to see NMW abolished but tax free income up to £20k a year. My opinion.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting points.

The Tories doing things because they know they won't last long? What a short memory you have. How many years of the Tories did we have last time?

 

Labour are just as much to blame as the Tories for the banking crisis if not more so.

 

The minimum wage argument saying that it will cause inflation,well since it has been introduced we have had low inflation. Who remembers the 70s, where was the minimum wage then. There are many costs that increase with no account for the labour costs,oil.steel.utilities.

 

The banks do pay huge bonuses but they get spent,sadly maybe on imports but also on local goods and services.

 

Most arguments have two sides.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see Labour jumping to the defence of the welfare (as they call it) cuts, and even if they did, I don't trust them either, whoever is in feathers their own nest it would seem. It was a Labour govt in 2009 who sent me to Atossers and found me fit, almost 18 months later a tribunal found in my favour, by then the Tories were in. I don't think any of them have a clue what to do or what they are doing, nothing seems to be thought through properly, and see David Cameron not even knowing how his own bedroom tax changes worked just baffles me even more as to who the hell makes all these decisions and why they haven't been strung up. Its even worse that all these lies and stupid decisions across the whole board are just allowed to continue, too many influential people backing each other and in each others pockets is the only conclusion I can come to. But that's just me and my simple logic, my simple mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I do detest IDS he does say what he means even if totally wrong I believe that he is the only MP that will answer a question with his own opinion (even when total ****) the rest just spout the party line without answering the original question or as on one occasion when pushed for an answer walk off stage.

 

dpick

cannot find it A to Z

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

 

Halifax :D

Paid in full £2295

 

MBNA:mad: 20/03/2008 settled in full out of court

 

Capital One:D

07/07/2007 Capital one charges paid in full £1666

19/01/2008 recovered PPI £2216 + costs

 

Littlewoods :-D

12/08/2007 write off £1176.10 debt.

 

JD Williams charges refunded in full £640

Link to post
Share on other sites

What IDS is saying is basically akin to 'we can't give starving people more food because those with full bellies aren't being given any more and it's not fair that they contribute surplus food just because people are starving'

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites
In order to pay the £6.19 per hour, the employer has to raise the cost of their goods to the buyer. The buyer in turn passes this onto the consumer who is the person being paid £6.19. However that consumer person can no longer afford the commodity due to the price increase. A wage increase happens again, price of goods go up further, the consumer person is no better off and so the cycle is repeated. When does it stop? When the employer is paying £100, £200 per hour and with the goods now priced even further out of reach?

 

Capitalism is broken, so there is no answer.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites
What IDS is saying is basically akin to 'we can't give starving people more food because those with full bellies aren't being given any more and it's not fair that they contribute surplus food just because people are starving'

 

but we can afford to give millionaires tax cuts and billions away to other countries.

Link to post
Share on other sites
but we can afford to give millionaires tax cuts

 

Indeed, you cold add to the analogy that 'people who we consider extra important will be given more food than they could ever need'.

 

 

and billions away to other countries.

 

Personally I don't differentiate between starving people based on where they live. I just wish that we could ensure that aid being given got to the people who need it - too often it doesn't.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites
i personally think they are all the same..we'd be better running the country ourselves without them :)

 

Now, that's a revolution I would join.

 

What IDS is saying is basically akin to 'we can't give starving people more food because those with full bellies aren't being given any more and it's not fair that they contribute surplus food just because people are starving'

 

Excellent analogy, estellyn. I'm going to try and remember that one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2937 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...