Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MKDP chasing old Welcome finance debt - SB'd?


Martynandemma
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3318 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out an agreement with welcome finance in 2004 for a car that I needed for work.

after a year I had to resign or the company told me I would be sacked.

 

I was unemployed for almost a year & could not keep up with the payments.

 

In the end we decided to refinance the agreement so I could make affordable payments.

 

When the original loan was paid off I do not think that the PPI was refunded plus something called short fall insurance which I have no idea about.

 

I believe that the ppi was miss-sold as I would not of agreed to it had I known that I could not claim if I was unemployed.

 

Also they did not explain the PPI properly & as I had been kept waiting for a car for almost 8 hours I just wanted to get out of there.

 

I may consider going to watchdog about these guys as they seem to be nothing more than loan sharks I now owe £7000 for a car worth about £1500.

 

I will be very interested in knowing if it is legal to put a finance charge that amounts to 2/3ds of the worth of the vehicle.

 

Also finance charges of £1300 on insurances that I did not ask for

 

any help will be great as I want to get unhooked from these sharks

 

many thanks

 

Martyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

morning all, I have the wost possible situation & dont know what to do

 

I got a car from welcome in 2004 on finance

 

I lost my job & couldnt kee up with payments, Welcome refinanced the agreement for me. I got another job but fell deep into debt.

 

Welcome then allowed me to refinance again. I am finding it difficult to pay them & I am now 2 months behind

 

 

Now for the big problem....The car broke down 18 months ago & I had it towed to my home. tax ran out so it was a case of fix it or crush it.

 

Someone came & towed it to the crushers free of charge but I listed the car as being off the road. What do I do now, if I tell welcome that I had it crushed what can they do & do I have to pay the full amount of the finance.

 

I originally signed an agreement for a car worth 4000 due to refinancing the debt is now 9000

 

Someone help me please !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why di you crush it, it was welcomes car; if it was a major fault you could of got them to fix it! or you could of given it back to them? They will want their money as there is now no car; sorry but you will have to pay or agrre some sort of settlement, suggest you speak to CAB about this, if interest on loan high they may be able to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I told them about the problem but they said that if they fixed it I would be charged for the towing, repairs & anything else that needed doing

 

I was unemployed at the time so could not afford to get it towed to them. I couldnt keep it off the road & the MOT was due as well as the tax, if I hadnt got it crushed the council said they would crush it & I would of got charged for that too.

 

I really didnt know what else to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I want to see what Welcome have charged me over the years as I refinanced with them 3 times & now that I cant pay them anymore & lost the car while it was uninsured (off road) they are getting nasty & rude. Threatening all kinds of stuff.

 

If I send them an SAR do they have to send me statements & agreements.

 

If they dont do that what happens?

 

many thanks

 

martyn

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to comply with your subject access request within 40 days, if they don't then you issue a letter before action, giving them a further 7-14 days to respond (enclosing a copy of your original letter) if they fail to respond at that stage then you can take them to court where a judge will award you compensation, or you can complain to the Information Commissioners Office....this is one cagger who took a company to court because they never responded to his SAR - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/49571-havinastella-lloyds-tsb-3.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you must also do as an aside to the SAR, is to send off for a copy of your agreements. This costs £1 (send recorded), this is a separate request to a SAR (which is just a request for all information they have on you)....the CCA is a formal request for JUST your agreements... - You can find this here - The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors The CCA request is number 8 the SAR is number 11

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right I will put my updates in this thread,

 

Knew I shouldnt of answered the phone !!! mad.gif

 

Just had a call from welcomes "Legal" dept ?? do they have one ??

 

I was in a good mood (bloody not now) so I took the call. I dont think they know how to communicate phoned on mobile (been told 6 times now I have given the phone to my sister)

 

Informed them that they had received a recorded delivery with income exp on it. Told that they would go to court in 14 days to get car back (even though they have been told 6 times I dont have it)

 

I told him that to do that he would need to default me first he replied yeah i know (I suspect he didnt)

 

I got angry & said was the reason that they were getiing nasty because they were going out of business (he laughed & said who told you that ?, I said err its in the news)

 

I asked him where were my credit agreements & statements & why was there a 3k difference between my up to date credit file & the letters they had been sending me. He replied erm sorry didnt catch that what did you say ?

 

I said I am hanging up now he said ok then!!

 

Right time to report them to trading standards etc!!!

 

I have not received my agreements & the guy made me so angry I sort of let it slip the reason I wanted them, do you think they will refuse me them.

 

If they dont send me my agreements, statements etc does that make my agreement void ??

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you are aware

you can put the account into official disput after 14 days from when welcome receive your cca request, if they dont comply

 

this needs to be by an official cca request with a one pound postel order.

 

do not deal with the local office,

they are trained chimps and would not know what a cca request is

 

send by recorded delievery to

 

welcome financial services

compliance

ruddington fields biz park

ruddington

nottingham

ng11 6nz

 

 

may i ask how long you have had the agreement

what is the state of any arrears

what is the situation with the car

 

do you have micky mouse insurance forced on you

 

ppi etc

 

 

please every thing in writing with this lot

 

garbage comes straight from the mouth with this lot

 

 

after 14 days you can with hold payments with no enforcement or penalty

 

welcome may have other ideas

they think the law does not apply to them

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks postggj

 

To cut a very long story short

 

took out car finance in 17/5/2004, all the usual rubbish PPI, breakdown insurance & shortfall insurance

monthly agreement £206

car hired cash price £3982 total ammount to pay over 4 years 9920.64

 

then in 21/07/2005 renegotiated payments

credit cash advance £5208

£119.32 per month

total amount to pay over 75mnths £8949

 

unemployed couldnt afford payments

modifying hp agreement

£5326.44

£78.22 per mnth

total amount to pay over 10 years £9386.40

 

ok will be back later to finish have to go to the job centre

 

back soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks postggj

 

To cut a very long story short

 

took out car finance in 17/5/2004, all the usual rubbish PPI, breakdown insurance & shortfall insurance

monthly agreement £206

car hired cash price £3982 total ammount to pay over 4 years 9920.64

 

then in 21/07/2005 renegotiated payments

credit cash advance £5208

£119.32 per month

total amount to pay over 75mnths £8949

 

unemployed couldnt afford payments

modifying hp agreement

£5326.44

£78.22 per mnth

total amount to pay over 10 years £9386.40

 

ok will be back later to finish have to go to the job centre

 

back soon

 

OK back now

 

so to continue,

last agreement was taken out in august 2007

 

I struggled to make agreed payments & I have missed a lot of payments (about 6 - 8) I last paid them a monthly payment on the 31/03/09 so I havent paid them anything for 2 months

 

I sent them an SAR, a CCA & a letter requesting no calls by recorded delivery & they were signed for on 22/05/2009

 

the address I sent them to was the one I was told to use on another forum

WELCOME FINANCE LIMITED

KINGSTON HOUSE

CENTRE 27 BUSINESS PARK

WOODHEAD ROAD, BIRSTALL BATLEY

WEST YORKSHIRE

WF17 9TD

 

they called me yesterday & I have since reported them to Consumer Direct who will be advising the OFT.

 

This morning I have (surprise surprise) received what is supposed to be a default notice I dont think it is a legal one but you are better placed than me to answer. I will give you a brief outline in another message

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I start I must add that I have sent them an income expenditure letter with an offer of £5 a month (even though I only have £3.87 per month available)

 

default notice is written up like so

 

Its from the middlesex office who I have never dealt with. 2 sheets of paper, 1st is welcome headed paper. WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dear Mr Pugh FAILURE TO READ THIS LETTER MAY RESULT IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

You are hereby served under section 87 (1) of the CCA with the attached Default Notice (no year mentioned on this page for the CCA) then usual nonsense about 14 days to contact them & if I fail they will apply through the courts for an attachment of earning order to be deducted from my employers (err I am unemployed good luck with that one !!) letter says that an OFT sheet should be in this letter (their isnt one). Then it strongly urges me to telephone the undersigned with my intentions (the undersigned is the bloke who phoned me yesterday!!) never had any dealings with his office so I have no reason to call him.

 

Now the default notice itself served under section 87 (1) of the CCA 1974 (is this correct ?)

date of notice, agreement reference between Mr martin pugh of my address (my name is spelt with a Y not an I ??) & WELCOME FINANCE of Office 18 Channelsea Hse, Canning road abbey lane stratford E153ND

 

my agreement is between me & Welcome Finance of Batley which is the head office, I have never had any dealings with the stratford office my local office is in Romford so I dont see how it can be valid

 

The notice mentions the usual if you do take action or if you dont take action plus amounts arrears & total payable finally at the bottom the words signed......... Branch manager, Welcome Finance (he hasnt signed it) the only signiature is that on the welcome headed paper.

 

Sorry for the length of this but what do you think ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

the default notice as usual is crap

saying 14 days is not good enough

a date needs to be inserted to rectify the breach

 

they have shot themselves in the foot

 

without prejudice means the letter cant be used in court with out the agreement of both sides

 

HELLO, ANY BODY HOME WELCOME

ITS A DEFAULT NOTICE

 

 

PURE CRAP FROM WELCOME AS USUAL

 

KEEP THE DEFAULT NOTICE ON THE QT

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to appear thick but what does QT mean (quiet??)

 

You just confirmed what i thought, interesting side point my wife called up the romford branch to make an enquiry. She asked if they had my account they said my account had been transferred to the stratford office but they said she would need to ask me to tell her why I was in serious arrears & am now in default.

 

err Data protection act anyone?? (she withheld our number so they didnt know who it was the only info my wife gave them was my name) so she could have been anyone !! Doesnt the data protection act require that information cannot be given to another party ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the stratford number is 0208 744 8852

 

the cheeky swines also sent mr one of their default telephone charges letters for which they charge £10 a time

 

I am off to my sisters now could you PM me why I will only be liable for the arrears I would love to know :lol:

 

thanks again postggj

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

All Will Become Apparent In Due Time

 

Patientce

Revenge Is A Dish Best Served Cold

 

So They Have Charged You Ten Quid Foe A Letter After Allready Terminating The Account By A Default Notice

 

Naughty Welcome

 

Slowly Slowly

Catchy Monkey

 

Sorry Marty

I Know You Are Getting Confused But You Just Have To Know The Welcome Mind Set

 

They Are Not Very Bright

Link to post
Share on other sites

mwrty

 

very curiouse

 

me being me and being such an underhand &^$%&^ with welcome, i calledthem

 

all innocent i asked if this was compliance

 

they never said they were welcome

 

when pushed they said they were welcome from feltham

 

is feltham not in middx

 

ime staying with this, hold tight till i have some answers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...