Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st credit and old Northern Rock Loan & Card Sold to Co-Op - SB'd - Scotland


Tartan Barty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a NR loan and CC that was sold to the Co-op a few years ago, not through lack of payment. The Co-op have been accepting reduced payments on both since my finances went t*ts-up in 2003. They are now starting the old 'we won't accept anything less than £150 per month' routine. Just wondered if anyone had experience of CCA'ing loans and CC's that the Co-op bought from NR. Is it likely they got the correct paperwork when the sale went through??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I CCA'd Co-Op for a £15k Northern Wreck card. They eventually produced an unenforceable agreement which they attempted to pursue. However, a few months before my circumstances changed I'd been the victim of fraudulent use of the card number; Co-Op opened a new account (balance: Nil) and issued a new card that I didn't activate. They then transferred the old balance to the new account and tried to pursue that one instead. They could not, of course, produce a CCA - because there wasn't one - and after six months I've heard no more. I imagine it'll resurface eventuall, having been flogged to some bottom feeders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could not get rid of them for a previous tenants debt until they were threatend with court action for harressement.

 

have not heard from them since and dont expect l wil be

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the phone calls continue and now they say that they have sent an I&E form for me to complete. Last time they did that they asked for 3 wage slips, a statement from each of my credit etc. I reported them to the FOS and they made a formal complaint on my behalf. Never heard back from the Co-op until now.

 

Is there a head office address for the CCA requests to go to? I only have a PO Box no from the credit card statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re the s10 bit...I have a default on my file from 1st Crudit for this loan. Now surely if they can't supply the agreement they can't process my data.

 

Can anyone point me towards the letter with the s10 bit where it says you must cease in 21 days or write to me explaining why in 14 days, can't just say 'legal right' etc.

 

I have spent 2 hours looking through posts but can't find an example!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean this letter?

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 21 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 21 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

BLAH

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YW.

 

Send by RD and dont sign it

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Essentially Co-Operative Bank are admitting that they do not have an agreement and they know that the debt is unenforceable. However, the so-called ethical bank thinks that by waffling about payments and statements, you will be persuaded that they have a case and will give them money. You can safely ignore this rubbish.

 

They have failed to comply with your s.77/78 request.

 

As far as the next move is concerned, I'd be inclined wait until 12 working days have passed since they received your request, and then drop them a line reminding them that whilst they remain in default of your formal request, under the CCA 1974 they may not demand payment, and nor do you have to offer any.

 

Since they have no agreement at all, they will also not be able to prove that you expressly consented to the processing and sharing of data - so send them a s.10 Notice as well.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok a quick update. Following their letter they continued to call but didn't get any response. They then sent a letter which arrived on the day the 12 days ended saying they wanted the whole amount for the credit card. That night I got a call from Phoenix Credit Services Ltd who said Co-op had passed on the other debt.

 

The conversation went something like:

Phoenix Muppet: Can you give me the first character from your password

Me: No

Phoenix Muppet: Is that because you don't know it or because you won't

Me: Because this account is in dispute and should not have been passed to you

Phoenix Muppet: But the Co-op have passed it to us

Me: Well they haven't supplied me with an enforceable agreement so its in dispute

Phoenix Muppet: What do you mean, it's in dispute

Me: Failure to supply a enforceable agreement, not allowed to ask for payment, not obliged to offer payment, not allowed to default, not allowed to pass on to 3rd party etc etc

Phoenix Muppet: Thank you [click]

 

God that felt good....!

 

Now Phoenix have sent me a letter and it says they are a subsidery of Co-op. Do I need to send them the 'I am surprised......' letter or should they know the account is in dispute and ignore them??

 

Can Co-op pass the account over during the 12 days???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a statement through from the coop today and they have now started charging me £12 arrears charge and £25 interest. The 12 days was up on the 8th May and they applied the charges on the 7th. I have continued to make payments.

 

Any ideas how I play this one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Much to my surprise I have received a copy of my agreement from 1st Credit

 

http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk222/Tartan_Barty/NRCCA.jpg

 

Please tell me this is unenforcable.....it looks good to me.

 

I really don't want to have to pay anything to these muppets

 

After making a CCA request to 1st Credit in Feb 08 they have somehow found my agrremenf from 2001!!! They have sent a letter with it and some statements.

 

Firstly the agreement looks like it has all the terms required to make it enforcable

See http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk222/Tartan_Barty/NRCCA.jpg

 

The statements are for the time the loan was with Northern Rock but make no mention of the time it has been with 1st credit. Are they supposed to send me a statement of payments to them???

 

If anyone can spot anything wrong with the agreement please post as I really want this to go back to NR and not pay the heartless 1st crundit monkeys anything.

 

*bump* can anyone help?????

 

Just reading through some other threads....if the agreement is sent by post for me to sign at home after NR have signed it, should it have cancellation rights? Also it says that there are T&c's overleaf but I don't have the overleaf bit. Does that make a difference??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Sorry for the delay,

 

well, having looked at the agreement, i have to say, it does look good,

 

have festering crudit sent you a notice of assignment? are they indeed the legal owners of the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that pt

 

The letter said " with regards to your request for a copy of the deed of assignment, we would refer you to section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 which provides that the debtor is notified of the assignment of the debt in writing and not a copy of the deed itself. A notice of assignment was generated on the 5th July 2005 and posted to you"

 

I can't remember if that's true or not!!!

 

So my questions are:

1. This was a unsecured loan done on the internet so does that make it non-cancellable?

2. It refers to "terms & conditions overleaf" which I don't have. Does that make a difference?

3. I don't have any statement of account from when it was passed to 1st Crundit does that matter?

4. The NR statement shows an opening balance on the 31/01/01, the agreement was signed by them on the 22/02/01, by me on the 26/02/01 and the first repayment was on the 09/04/01. Why was the balanced opened before the agreement was signed??

 

ANy help MUCH appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Your message advises that you only requested the CCA and that is what you got. Did you make any payments to 1st credit?If so, you can always request a statement of account from them, maybe worth it just to ensure the balance is correct.

 

From the image it looks ok, are you in dispute with anything in specific? If so i would maybe look at the T&C's if you have them.

 

Hope that hekps,

 

all the best!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see partial terms and conditions , in fact it says they are only partial terms and conditions by mentioning the fact the rest are overleaf .

 

So you'd at least need the other side of this document . Unless there is a law that says everything needs to be on the same page.

 

some more info :

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/127412-barclaycard-cca-documents-enclosed-2.html

Edited by Rahl
Link to post
Share on other sites

And so the phone calls start again but from a different number.

 

I am planning on sending the following:

Quote

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

 

THIS ACCOUNT IS CURRENTLY IN DISPUTE

 

 

Ref:

 

Thank you for your letter dated XXX, the contents of which has been noted.

 

On XXX, I sent a consumer credit act 1974 s77-79 request for a true copy of my credit agreement, with the prescribed payment, a current and fully up-to date statement for this account and a signed true copy of the deed of assignment.

 

You have failed to supply the following:

 

  • A complete true signed copy of the credit agreement (The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both the original creditor and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document)
  • A current and fully up-to date statement for this account (you are legally obliged to send this, I am not asking for all data held; i.e. a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request and therefore you cannot charge for this)
  • A signed true copy of the deed of assignment (I have not received any correspondence from either the original lender or yourself to prove you now owned this alleged debt)

You have failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and failed to provide all of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

Any comments??

 

Sent the letter special delivery last night so will see what they say.

 

Anyone any answers to the questions in post #33????

 

bump

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they supposed to send me a statement of payments to them???

 

Yes. The copy of the agreement should be accompanied by a statement of account as stated in the Act.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...