Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

work programme after 2 years


bcham
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3379 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have heard some horror stories of what happens when you go back to the JCP but I think these are propaganda by in training to get people to take a job. I believe you can though be mandated to daily signing or daily visits to the JCP to look for work .

 

Frankly I am not so sure that labour will get in and if they do does anyone think they are really any different? They all want the DM vote and being hard on the "dole ****" is a good way to appease that paper , that and getting the foreigners out , especially the foreign dole ****..double whammy

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have heard some horror stories of what happens when you go back to the JCP but I think these are propaganda by in training to get people to take a job. I believe you can though be mandated to daily signing or daily visits to the JCP to look for work .

 

Frankly I am not so sure that labour will get in and if they do does anyone think they are really any different? They all want the DM vote and being hard on the "dole ****" is a good way to appease that paper , that and getting the foreigners out , especially the foreign dole ****..double whammy

They wont let you just sit around doing nothing but in my area when labour were in power i was at school an then had a job but my sister who was a single parent when her daughter was 14 or 15 she got put with the jobcentre and they sent her to do voluntary work but at places with real work where u can work towards a recognisd qualification she did Nvq's in Gardening with The Council working along side the local parks and gardens staff then while she was waiting to do the 2nd Nvq she still couldnt find work so she went to do her food hygiene certificate while she was waiting for places to fill up so they have group to do Nvq3 in horticulture then got a job after that working as a supervisor in the garden department of a Focus Store

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

update on this is, after the 2 year work progamme call it what you may you return back to the jobcentre for 1 whole year where the system is supposed to be more intense. bad news is after the 1 year back with jobcentre if you are still unemployed you go right back to your work provider where they put you on a 6 month placement doing 30 hrs work plus 4 hours jobsearch per week. I know this to be fact as its happened to my mate only this week. the 6 month placement back with your work provider only started last week as my mate was the 12th person in our town to be returned to sarina russo and he is 61 years old. my mate was also working as a volunteer with the salvation army which jcp didn't want to know about as they told my mate to many people were jumping on the volunteer bandwagon trying to avoid being directed by work programmers and jcp. my mates advisor told him the real reason was job agencies were losing out when folks volunteered instead of being directed by them. look into it how you like folks but that's the steps jcp are now taking so volunteering off your own back wont be accepted anymore by the looks of things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

update on this is, after the 2 year work progamme call it what you may you return back to the jobcentre for 1 whole year where the system is supposed to be more intense. bad news is after the 1 year back with jobcentre if you are still unemployed you go right back to your work provider where they put you on a 6 month placement doing 30 hrs work plus 4 hours jobsearch per week. I know this to be fact as its happened to my mate only this week. the 6 month placement back with your work provider only started last week as my mate was the 12th person in our town to be returned to sarina russo and he is 61 years old. my mate was also working as a volunteer with the salvation army which jcp didn't want to know about as they told my mate to many people were jumping on the volunteer bandwagon trying to avoid being directed by work programmers and jcp. my mates advisor told him the real reason was job agencies were losing out when folks volunteered instead of being directed by them. look into it how you like folks but that's the steps jcp are now taking so volunteering off your own back wont be accepted anymore by the looks of things.

 

 

The scheme that you are referring to here sounds like the Community Work Placements Scheme (CWP). It was supposed to have gone live in April 2014 but the implementation was delayed.

 

CWP is targeted at claimants who have 'little work experience or are lacking motivation'. The placement is meant to give the claimant experience similar to that which the 4 week Mandatory Work Activity schemes (MWA) was supposed to offer but for a longer period. The rules of engagement, apart from the length of time (6 months) that a claimant is on it, are very similar.

 

From what you say your mate seems to have been rail-roaded onto this scheme without the proper procedures being followed and a degree of 'flannel' by the adviser.

 

The comment by the adviser as to the real reason for placing your mate on CWP makes a mockery of the officially stated objectives of the scheme. That comment alone, in my view, leaves adviser and/or the Job Centre wide open to legal challenge.

 

Another point that I would challenge is the veracity of the comment that a claimant can be returned to the Work Programme Provider. The Post Work Programme Guidance categorically rules this out.

 

For your mate's information, or anyone else's, the DWP's 'Community Work Placements Guidance' can be read and down-loaded from this link:

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...vider-guidance

Before going any further I would insist on seeing a copy of any new Guidance, effective from last week, that advisers claim to be following.

 

 

PS:

 

I have been off the Work Programme for about one and a half years now and I haven't been pressed to participate in this scheme yet, far less after one year.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point that I would challenge is the veracity of the comment that a claimant can be returned to the Work Programme Provider. The Post Work Programme Guidance categorically rules this out.

 

It is quite likely that the same provider is running both the Work Programme and the CWP in this region.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been off the Work Programme for about one and a half years now and I haven't been pressed to participate in this scheme yet, far less after one year.

 

Same here. They're basically saying 'we can't think of anything else to do with you' so just sign on fortnightly. I hope by now they class me as one of the ones who always does what's required - subject to the guidelines, naturally - and will continue to leave me mostly alone... please :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same here. They're basically saying 'we can't think of anything else to do with you' so just sign on fortnightly. I hope by now they class me as one of the ones who always does what's required - subject to the guidelines, naturally - and will continue to leave me mostly alone... please :)

Unfortunately it doesn't work like that

JCP doesn't seem to allow for individuality, you'll be exoexted to leap to obey every stupid command

Link to post
Share on other sites

my mate is 61 and did his first year with jcp then 2 years with sarina russo then another year back with jcp now on 6 month placement run by his 2 year back to work provider sarina russo. I will see him tomorrow so will find out where his 6 month placement will be. as I pointed out he has been volunteering with the salvation army now for about 6 months but his jcp advisor stated they are no longer accepting this and he will be sent on a 6 month placement organised by sarina russo. I think as others have mentioned I don't think jcp have a clue what to do with long term unemployed but if we listen to government unemployment is a thing of the past lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...