Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


BankFodder

Official - UKCPS won't pursue difficult cases because they are not cost-effective!!

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2519 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

More support for the advice that you should not ignore completely but that you should make it clear that you are up for a fight.

Here are some heavily redacted extracts:-

 

UKCPS lawyers are rejecting tricky cases to save cash

 

....[Lawyers] are encouraged to keep cases that are likely to “crack” — fail to proceed — because evidence is weak or witnesses are unlikely to turn up. This means that the service does not have to pay for the trial.

 

....[A leaked] e-mail exposed a UKCPS culture driven by “cost and cost alone”.

 

.... Ms McGowan said that the focus on cost and budget rather than the quality of advocacy was a “serious blow ...”. It had long been suspected that the UKCPS instructed its advocates on cost-driven criteria but there had been no evidence, she said.

Full horrible story here:- http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/law/article3698204.ece#

 

Shocking. I had always thought that the United Kingdom Crown Prosecution Service has great integrity


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually. that story is also true regarding the PPC of the same name. It's been shown that when they send out court papers and a good, strong defence is submitted then they will drop the case . This is because they seem to be going after "sift targets" who will cave in and pay when they receive court papers. So the motto should be when dealing with the PPC "see you in court" and call their bluff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UKCPS have published a statement about their email and they are trying to resile from their position

 

http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2013/02/dpp-statement-on-use-of-external-advocates.html

 

Frankly, I am getting very confused. I think that we should expect better from BPA members and I call upon the BPA to SORT OUT THIS MESS! You owe it to your victims

 

 


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mistaken identity/play on name. PPC's seem to choose names that could be confused with proper authority.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Im new to all of this. would appreciate hearing from anyone who can help.

I was parked at New Mersey Retail park in a disabled bay. i didnt realise my badge was out of date. I got a ticket from the Ukcps. I have since renewed my badge but think i have done the wrong thing by replying to the UKCPS saying i am the registered driver and owner of the vehicle. they have rejected my appeal. Do i just ignore their letters from now on. please help.

thanks

Lin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just point your cursor to the BOLD ignore in your post for further advise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...