Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AVIVA - EQUITY RELEASE - Redemption Penalty Help needed please !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2672 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Aviva

 

My Mother in law (and late Father in law) took out an Equity release deal with NU (now Aviva) in early 2002

 

They did sign on the dotted line and had IFA advice (family member who was an IFA) ....they wanted to tuck some money away for the future plus pay off a few bills....although in truth they did not understand the nature and impact of the redemption penalty rules (few would..)

 

11 years on she is a lonely widow and wants to downsize from the house - her husband died 5 years ago now and she is lonely + its to big to heat and manage, the stairs are becoming a struggle for her and in truth we would prefer her nearer to us now in a retirement home and in a quieter area (she is in Bromley Kent).

 

we are over an hour away and want her 10 mins away ....Summary the £50k loan is now £118k......cant despute that .....but the redemption penalty clause states its based on the Redemption Gilt yield differential between Jan 2002 and the date of redemption for the UK 2028 6% Treasury bonds

 

ouch ! - current yield is around 2.7% vs 4.7% in 2002..........the rules state that even a 2% differential equates to a 50% penalty on the original loan (thats another £25k on top of the £118k)

 

The IFA family member died a few years back and the IFA came for a chat then - but were not interested in her as there were no more commissions to be earned ..........so I had to write to aviva last week to request full costs and terms if we do close out the Loan.........

 

we have the document and its £135k including a £15,000 redemption fee at current rates

 

I have written to my solicitor for advice

 

Meanwhile perhaps here I can request directly heres that someone at Aviva can review this contract now and reduce (or at least cap) the somewhat incredulous penalty fees ?

 

I read that in 2004 a (25%) cap was placed on the NU/Aviva penalty clauses due to the unfair nature of earlier agreements - so could I at least request that ?

 

my other issue is that due to the dynamic market I have no lock in to what this redemption will be until the actual day of redemption ........this means I am trying to agree a moving net price with the retirement home .......this is not good and is causing a lot of grief for the family as it will take a few months to sell the house and we need every penny to secure a nice property

 

and no I do not want any further offers of more equity release ..enough is enough

 

thanks to Aviva in advance for some urgent advice.........just a contact will do please

 

thanks

Neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

Hi NVP

 

Thank you for your post. If you can email me at [email protected] and include the following details for your mother the policy holder, I will pass your query on to our the right team, get them to look into this for you and answer some of your questions.

 

Full Name

Date of birth

Post code

Policy Number

 

As the policy is not in your name we will need to contact your mother to confirm with her that she is happy for you to deal with this on her behalf, but as soon as i receive the details we can start processing this for you and hopefully get it all swiftly resolved.

 

Kind regards

 

Dave

 

 

Dave Hyam

Aviva Social Media Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Everyone after numerous hours of arguing - at least 1 failed attempt by Aviva to calculate the correct penalties and about 20 E-mails ...............I have yesterday received final confirmation that aviva will not uphold my complaint or be reducing the redemption penalty on my mother in laws terminated Agreement £150,000 of costs and fees including a £30,000+ redemption penalty based on Gilt yield differentials................a very unfair clause and approach that should never have been offered or sold into the deal without other options such as a cap. Not only will I now be escalating this to the onbudsman, the OFT and the courts but also Watchdog..............Aviva please dont cover this post again with a PR stunt and try to soften the message .................I mean business and will not walk away from this and neither should anyone else who is subjected to this 1 sided process........and dont tell me that Aviva is correct and legal ground - the redemption clause stinks ................if you look at the papers you will know that banks are provisioning hundreds of millions for missold derivatives which amounts to the same thing ......so its one rule for businesses and another rule for consumers not this time........if anyone can offer assistance or help or advice please e-Mail me at my trading business address [site team edited] thanks Nvp

Edited by honeybee13
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi there. I am a volunteer for social enterprise that does free complaints advice and Advocacy. I would suggest looking at the misselling of the product by the IFA. I would suggest contacting his network (who would have done his compliance) to raise the complaint.

 

We have had a good few of these complaints upheld recently but they tend to take time and lots of looking into the paperwork at the point of sale. Do you still have this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Im facing the same problem with my mother who is looking to downsize and facing a £30,000 charge on an original loan of £25,000!! I was wondering whether you have had any luck in your dealings with the onbudsman etc. It seems criminal what Aviva are expecting us to pay this!

 

Any advice/info you can give would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

Hi Jonbearwood99

 

As above I'd be happy to arrange for one of our team to look into this for you should you wish?. If so please send me your mother's

 

Full name

Date of birth

Post code

Policy number / reference

Your CAG username so I can link your post to the email

 

As the policy is not in your name we'll also need to contact your mother to confirm she is happy for you to deal with this on her behalf, but as soon as I receive the above details, we can start getting this looked at.

 

I'm at [email protected] and await your email.

 

Many thanks

 

Dave

Aviva Social Media Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

jonbearwood99 - how is you situation progressing?

 

My mother-in-law took out £50k in 2001,

ERC is currently £24K !??

 

 

Initial loan obviously wasn't suitable for need or circumstances

- as they put it into savings!

 

 

Infact there is still £30K of it in savings!

 

 

Father-in-law has passed away so trying to downsize,

 

 

but interest and ERC are making it almost impossible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
Im facing the same problem with my mother who is looking to downsize and facing a £30,000 charge on an original loan of £25,000!! I was wondering whether you have had any luck in your dealings with the onbudsman etc. It seems criminal what Aviva are expecting us to pay this!

 

Any advice/info you can give would be much appreciated.

 

My dad is also facing the same problem

 

 

he put n a complaint of misselling only for Aviva to uphold their decision that it wasn't Missold because they internally investigate and it's obvious they will not go against their own company

 

 

my mum and dad took theirs out 12 years ago sadly my mam passed away 2 years ago and the house is too big for him now and wants to downsize

 

 

Aviva are not interested in this

they just want the property at its current value and not the value at the time of the release,

 

 

they have told him to transfer to another property would cost him £25k and to settle early would cost him £10k

 

 

it's now in the hands of his solicitors who said if he had seen all his paperwork before he signed he wouldn't have let him sign it .

 

Would be interested to see how you guys get on and will keep you updated as to how my dad gets on

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original thread is now over 3yrs old

and has been yearly bumped by new posters since

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...