Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Kidnapped by Asda for refusing to Show Receipt on Exit.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Anyway davewright, you still haven't explained the dichotomy between your claim that the shop staff' have a duty (or indeed the basis for that duty), to ask for receipts, and your other claim that no-one can just accuse anyone of anything.

 

Ok Pimpy. ;)

 

If a member of staff (mainly security) thinks anything is untowards with a customer whether it be there not fit to be in the shop or they think that a customer hasn't paid for an item then they have a duty not only for themselves but for their employers to make sure that they take the appropriate action. Whether that is removing them from the shop, asking to see their receipt or phoning the police then so be it.

 

As mentioned before if the member of staff thinks that there is a problem then they are there to sort it out. If someone asks me for my receipt then if i think they are a member of staff i will show them without any questions asked. If you fail to show your receipt then it can in my eyes either be that you are too arrogant or that you have done something wrong.

 

If i was the member of staff at the time and i asked the customer to show me their receipt and they refused then alarm bells would ring. You as a customer have the right to do what you please but if it's failing to uphold the law or comply with the shops rules then you'll have to face the consequences. :)

 

What makes me laugh and think it's arrogance personified is the following: Ian Valentine Quotes: "The first officer then asked if I minded showing him my receipt for the purchased goods, and as he is an officer of the law I duly obliged"

 

My thoughts to that "take your head out of your bottom sir"

Edited by davewright13
typo
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok Pimpy. ;)

 

If a member of staff (mainly security) thing anything is untowards with a customer whether it be there not fit to be in the shop or they think that a customer hasn't paid for an item then they have a duty not only for themselves but for their employers to make sure that they take the appropriate action. Whether that is removing them from the shop, asking to see their receipt or phoning the police then so be it.

 

As mentioned before if the member of staff thinks that there is a problem then they are there to sort it out. If someone asks me for my receipt then if i think they are a member of staff i will show them without any questions asked. If you fail to show your receipt then it can in my eyes either be that you are too arrogant or that you have done something wrong.

 

If i was the member of staff at the time and i asked the customer to show me their receipt and they refused then alarm bells would ring. You as a customer have the right to do what you please but if it's failing to uphold the law or comply with the shops rules then you'll have to face the consequences. :)

 

What makes me laugh and think it's arrogance personified is the following: Ian Valentine Quotes: "The first officer then asked if I minded showing him my receipt for the purchased goods, and as he is an officer of the law I duly obliged"

 

My thoughts to that "take your head of of your bottom sir"

 

 

Ah! So!

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts to that "take your head out of your bottom sir"

 

 

 

Which bit of my explanation of the need not to be judgmental did you not understand?

 

I do not think, despite your circumloquacious post above, that your contributions are serving any purpose in helping the OP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this instance you are right that i'm not helping the op but to be fair i don't really think they need help do they?

 

Let me ask you this?

 

Does the OP need your help or were they simply venting? My conclusion reading his full post is that they are venting and not wishing for help?

 

I've not come here to argue with anyone but to give an honest account of what i see and if that's something that won't be tolerated then the exit door is looming. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A security guard in a shop has nor right to ask you to show them your receipt, has not right to detain you and has no right to search you. They can ask but you can refuse. If they detain you i.e. citizens arrest they need proof of theft and if no proof is forthcoming they have unlawfully detained the person and are open to having criminal charges laid against them.

My thoughts are that in this case the security guard was just trying to be awkward or show off and he came unstuck as there was no legal obligation to produce the receipt. As a matter of fact, once you have paid for the goods, there is no legal obligation for you to keep the receipt as the onus is on the retailer to prove that you did not pay for the goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received telephone call from the store 5pm today 19th Feb offering "vouchers" by way of an apology, so informed them that it was not about the vouchers it was about clearing my name publicly, making sure they put in place safeguards to prevent repitition, and financial compensation for the detention, distress etc caused. Informed store it is in the hands of their CEO and that i will deal with him to resolve the settlement.

 

That as got to make you laugh? Vouchers LOL.

 

Were they spend £40 and you get £5 off? LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this instance you are right that i'm not helping the op but to be fair i don't really think they need help do they?

 

If your judgment is that someone doesn't need help, then don't post on the thread - it's a simple concept.

 

 

Let me ask you this?

 

Does the OP need your help or were they simply venting? My conclusion reading his full post is that they are venting and not wishing for help?

 

 

See above; if, after reading the full post, you think that no help is needed, then you need do nothing. There are times when the help that's needed is the ability to vent; I see this regularly in my work.

 

I've not come here to argue with anyone

 

 

Epic fail so far, then.

 

CAG exists to help consumers with problems; if you can contribute positively to this, great. If not, then this may not be the place for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good goly man this is becoming personal. LOL

 

How can anyone not post on this thread with the headline "Kidnapped by Asda for refusing to Show Receipt on Exit"?

 

On one of your previous posts you say that people come here for help and to be fair other than his thread i really think the man needs help but defo not from you or i. :)

 

I won't post on this thread again as i hope you now know where i stand on this. ;)

 

Parting words "Don't Hate The Player, Hate The Game".

Edited by davewright13
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave you seem to either be trolling or condescending in most of the threads you post in. This forum is to HELP people. Not belittle them. If you want to do that, then go somewhere else.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing.

 

That dave blokes a bit on the loquacious side of verbage for CAG, isnt he?

 

Yeah, lets all roll over and let the dudes in errrrrm... bullet proof 100% polyester hi-vis jackets kick us around!

 

No- stand your ground and show them their true position in life, like that ASDA (SELF SNIP) is now discovering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your kind words and no i'm not a troll and as mentioned i like to speak my mind. Helping is in my nature to which you'll see if given the chance but again like i've said before what help did Ian need?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isnt a platform for davewright to speak his mind, you are trolling.

 

CAG is for the vulnerable and those scared witless by the oppressive world that Britain has been allowed to become and its going to get worse.

 

People need to know they dont have to take this carp. By reading Ian's story, others who find themselves in the same situation wll know that it is the shop that has to back any evidence of intent to steal goods, rather than the shopper having to prove otherwise.

 

There is more going here on CAG than you think dave.

 

Very few Caggers will contribute, but this thread and all the others will eventually be read by many thousands of people, some Caggers and some guests looking for advice and information and you have no idea what is going on in their minds or what drew them here.

 

Best to save speaking your mind and instead, make your advice non-judgemental, friendly and supporting OR simply keep your half baked opinions to yourself and butt out, unless you have something kind and useful to add.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks.

As I have stated previously I work in several of the large supermarket chains for an independent company. Today I was in one of them and heard what I thought was a bit of banter between a customer and a security guard. What it actually was, was the guard asking to see the customers receipt and the customer being very abusive, including racial abuse. The guard, after several requests, just said to the customer that he could leave as he couldn't detain him, but he would give his description to the store management. The customer went away still being abusive and the guard just wrote it down in his log book. Just an observation and a counter point of action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sounds like the security guard was well trained, remained calm and did his job correctly.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks.

As I have stated previously I work in several of the large supermarket chains for an independent company. Today I was in one of them and heard what I thought was a bit of banter between a customer and a security guard. What it actually was, was the guard asking to see the customers receipt and the customer being very abusive, including racial abuse. The guard, after several requests, just said to the customer that he could leave as he couldn't detain him, but he would give his description to the store management. The customer went away still being abusive and the guard just wrote it down in his log book. Just an observation and a counter point of action.

 

There's no excuse for racial abuse.

 

Of course, the guard could have called the police because of the racial element, but presumably the guard would then have to explain what offence he had accused or suspected the customer of committing in the first place.

 

I must remember, next time someone insults me, the riposte: "desist at once, or I might describe you to a shop manager!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

For all the big people who think it's no big deal, let me tell you a little story...

 

A friend of my daughter's (all her friends come to me when they need any kind of semi-legal opinion, even now!) contacted me a few months back, she was absolutely terrified. She had been confronted by a security guard who wanted to check her receipt (sounds familiar?), she had her screaming baby with her needing changing and feeding, so she asked why, he got stroppy, intimidated her, forcibly marched her (and screaming baby) to the office, rifled through her bag, took her personal info, and then let her go with a "And remember, I know where you live now!". She got home shell-shocked and immediately contacted me.

 

I of course advised her, pretty much on the lines of nearly anyone here, told her to complain straight away etc... The supermarket did take it seriously and said they'd investigate and get back to her.

 

The next day, the guy turned up at her door (thankfully, she didn't open, only looked through the peephole), ranting and raving that he'd been sacked and that she'd better withdraw her complaint straight away so he could get his job back (!), banging on the door, threatening... She had to call the police, of course, but she was traumatised for weeks afterwards, worried he was going to come back and take revenge...

 

An extreme case, I grant you. But the point is, regardless as to whether we feel OP was reasonable or not in the first place, that is a moral judgement, and we're not here to pass moral judgement.

 

Did the OP have a legal right not to show the receipt to someone who could have been anybody (having a high vis jacket could be a clever ploy for a crook after all, hiding in plain sight)? YES

Did the OP have a legal right not to show the receipt to someone even after they had reached the conclusion that person was indeed a store employee? YES

Did the employee have the right to detain the OP for refusing to show the receipt? NO

Is the store legally at fault? 100% YES.

 

Simple when you just break it down in legal facts instead of getting mired in moral opinions. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardly Kidnap is it, my adivce, show the receipt next time and avoid running into the big security guards. Was this an april fools?

 

Dont you mean wannabe police thugs who failed the police exam for lacking basic cerebral cortex function

 

they may play at police but private security have no more powers than i do

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...