Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx100uk
      Licensed breeder Puppy farm & genetically sick pups.***Settled***

      By dx100uk · Posted

      deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Lesley A
      Licensed breeder Puppy farm & genetically sick pups.***Settled***

      By Lesley A · Posted

      Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • slick132
      soccersixes chasing owed money

      By slick132 · Posted

      Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • NewsBot
      Why Virgin Money takeover may mean better rates for Nationwide savers - SYLVIA MORRIS explains

      By NewsBot · Posted

      Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • dx100uk
      Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card.

      By dx100uk · Posted

      unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Staff car

seklof
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted (edited)
the car was lent to the staff member - it was put into his name on the v5 doc for insurance purposes- he then left the company and started work elsewhere

 

V5 shows registered keeper, not owner (in case the ex-employee says "it's my name on the v5").

 

Who paid for the car?. The company? The employee? The employee with the company re-paying them as an "expense"?

 

Does the company have any paperwork (paper or even e-mail) where it was discussed with the employee in case they claim it was given rather than lent?

 

If they are claiming it was given, did they declare it as a benefit in kind to HMRC (a call to HMRC may be in order if they are claiming it was given rather than lent!)

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
seklof

seklof

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ill try to make this simple for the less insidious of you out there - im the owner of the company i offered one of the employees personally a car to get him about etc etc , he then decides to start being difficult with persistent lateness so i asked him to leave the company , my car has not been seen since ?

a small claim court would be the suitable option i think here

Link to post
Share on other sites
Emmzzi

Emmzzi

Posted
Posted
V5 shows registered keeper, not owner (in case the ex-employee says "it's my name on the v5").

 

Who paid for the car?. The company? The employee? The employee with the company re-paying them as an "expense"?

 

Does the company have any paperwork (paper or even e-mail) where it was discussed with the employee in case they claim it was given rather than lent?

 

If they are claiming it was given, did they declare it as a benefit in kind to HMRC (a call to HMRC may be in order if they are claiming it was given rather than lent!)

 

Bazza asked some great questions. How about answering them? We need to know what you have documented. Right now it looks like a gift so you have no case!

 

By the way, do you think calling people insidious is a great way to get help?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
seklof

seklof

Posted
  • Author
Posted

hi there

 

its a personal thing really - the v5 was put into his name but i have the v5 and it was put into my name - i did it as a gesture of good will to the staff member and not in any way connected to the company i just did it to help him on a bit

i have an e mail saying he still has my car but wont return it

Link to post
Share on other sites
honeybee13

honeybee13

Posted
Posted
hi there

 

its a personal thing really - the v5 was put into his name but i have the v5 and it was put into my name - i did it as a gesture of good will to the staff member and not in any way connected to the company i just did it to help him on a bit

i have an e mail saying he still has my car but wont return it

 

Hello there.

 

I think it's going to be difficult for the guys to advise you without fuller details, I could be wrong.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Emmzzi

Emmzzi

Posted
Posted

Have you reported it stolen to the police? What did they say?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites
steampowered

steampowered

Posted
Posted

It is very difficult to give a clear answer on this one. You will say the car was given to him on loan. He will say the car was a gift. A court would look at the evidence and decide who, on a balance of probabilities, is more likely to be correct. If you feel you have the right of it, then send him a letter before action asking for return of the car within 14 days. If you do not get an adequate response then start county court proceedings.

 

If the car was loaned to him as part of his employment, I imagine that is taxable and you probably should have deducted tax from his pay to account for that, in which case you would be liable to HMRC for the unpaid tax. I haven't checked the tax rules on this but I doubt it would be much.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
seklof

seklof

Posted
  • Author
Posted

thats exactly correct - it had nothing to do with his employ it was purely to get him some wheels - poor part of the world we live in here _,so what you say is correct and about what i thought , write a letter if no response then get it to court let them decide

 

great stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...