Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks BankFodder for your latest, I'm in complete agreement on the subject of mediation and will be choosing to decline mediation, the longer timeline is not an issue for me, I will happily let the going to court run it's course. I really appreciate the support from the Consumer Action Group. I'll post the email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response. Regards, J
    • Sec127 (3) repealed, now gone. S. 127(3)-(5) repealed (6.4.2007) by Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c. 14), ss. {15}, 70, 71(2), {Sch. 4} (with Sch. 3 para. 11); S.I. 2007/123, art. 3(2), Sch. 2
    • We used to recommend that people accept mediation but our advice has changed. The mediation process is unclear. Before you can embark on it you have to agree that you are prepared to enter a compromise – and that means that you agree that you are prepared to give up some of your rights even though you are completely in the right and you are entitled to hundred percent of your money and even though EVRi are simply trying to obstruct you in order to discourage you and also to put others who might want to follow your example off from claiming and even though they have a legitimate basis for reimbursement. Mediation is not transparent. In addition to having to sign up that you are prepared to give up some of your rights, you will also have to agree not to reveal any details of the mediation – including the result of the mediation – so that the whole thing is kept secret. This is not open justice. Mediation has nothing to do with justice. The only way of getting justice is to make sure that this matter goes to trial unless EVRi or the other parcel delivery companies put their hands up and accept the responsibility even if they do it is a gesture of goodwill. Going to trial and winning at trial produces a judgement which we can then add to our small collection to assist other people who are in a similar boat. EVRi had been leading you around by the nose since at least January – and probably last year as well – and their whole purpose is simply to drag it out, to place obstacles in your way, to deter other people, and to make you wish that you'd never started the process and that you are prepared to give up your 300 quid. You shouldn't stand for it. You should take control. EVRi would prefer that you went to mediation and if nothing else that is one excellent reason why you should decline mediation and go to court. If it's good for them it's bad for you. On mediation form, you should sign that you are not prepared to compromise and that you are not prepared to keep the result secret but that you want to share the results with other people in similar circumstances. This means that the mediation won't go ahead. It will take slightly longer and you will have to pay a court fee but you will get that back when you win and you will have much greater satisfaction. Also, once you go the whole process, you will learn even more about bringing a small claim in the County Court so that if this kind of thing happens again you will know what to do and you will go ahead without any hesitation. Finally, if you call EVRi's bluff and refuse mediation and go to trial, there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but there is a chance that they will agree to pay out your claim before trial simply in order to avoid a judgement. Another judgement against them will simply hurt the position even more and they really don't want this. 300 quid plus your costs is peanuts to them. They don't care about it. They will set it off against tax so the taxpayer will make their contribution. It's all about maintaining their business model of not being liable for anything, and limiting or excluding liability contrary to section 57 and section 72 of the consumer rights act.     And incidentally, there is a myth that if you refuse mediation that somehow it will go against you and the judge will take a dim view and be critical of you. This is precisely a myth. It's not true. It would be highly improper if any judge decided the case against you on anything other than the facts and the law of the case. So don't worry about that. The downside of declining mediation is that your case will take slightly longer. The upside is that if you win you will get all your money and you will have a judgement in your favour which will help others. The chances of you winning in this case are better than 95% and of course you would then receive 100% of your claim plus costs
    • Nice to hear a positive story about a company on this form for a change. Thank you
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bedroom tax on a room which is not a bedroom?


snugs1235
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3930 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am wondering if anyone has any advice regarding the changes to housing benefit regarding sparerooms in April.

 

I live with my husband in what would be a 2 bedroomed house except for the fact that he is disabled so the second bedroom has a lift that goes into it (a full wheelchair through the ceiling/floor lift). There is no extra room in this room definitley not enough for any bed.

 

I wrote back to my council when they said that they would be cutting my housing benefit by just under £20 a week explaining that this is not a spare bedroom. They wrote back with a standard letter, the same as the one I received originally. I wrote back again and got the same letter for a third time.

 

I cant afford to pay nearly £80 a month extra and will be homeless if I cant sort this out.

 

Does anyone have any advice at all, im desperate?

 

Thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the floor area of the room? If it's less than 70 sqr feet you can argue it's too small to be called a bedroom as there's precedent in the Reigate case referred to here http://speye.wordpress.com/2013/01/29/bedroom-tax-overcrowding-more-illegalities-and-perversities/ You (and, Caggers, everyone else having problems with the bedrom tax) should read the series of blogs he's made on the subject.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am wondering if anyone has any advice regarding the changes to housing benefit regarding sparerooms in April.

 

 

 

I live with my husband in what would be a 2 bedroomed house except for the fact that he is disabled so the second bedroom has a lift that goes into it (a full wheelchair through the ceiling/floor lift). There is no extra room in this room definitley not enough for any bed.

 

I wrote back to my council when they said that they would be cutting my housing benefit by just under £20 a week explaining that this is not a spare bedroom. They wrote back with a standard letter, the same as the one I received originally. I wrote back again and got the same letter for a third time.

 

I cant afford to pay nearly £80 a month extra and will be homeless if I cant sort this out.

 

Does anyone have any advice at all, im desperate?

 

Thanks for reading.

 

The local authority should have the common decency to give a proper answer. Two many of them just send out standard letters. I would go to your MP..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you SWL that is very interesting and is just the information that I am looking for.

 

Thank you consumer dude. It is very frustrating when I write them a letter with specific detailed questions that they dont answer at all in their standard print out! I will try one more letter using the information that SWL has given and then I will go to my MP.

 

Thanks guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the government have left it up to social landlords to determine the number of bedrooms in a property

 

who is your landlord? is it the council? or a housing association?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting!

 

I live in an LA owned home, at the moment fully occupied but when one of my children leave home I will officially have a spare bedroom. It is 6ft by 6ft, and actually usable space is less than that as the door into it is half way along a wall so you can get a bed in there and small bedside unit, no drawers or anything, they are on the landing which we squeeze by to get to the loo (probably a fire hazard).

 

Are you saying this 6ft square room is not a bedroom? How can I prove this to my LA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi snugs,

 

Presumably the LA had to give permission for this adaptation of the bedroom to take place so their records will show that this room with a lift platform in the middle of it cannot be used as a bedroom.

 

Forget the MP unless you know they are brilliant. Most of them are pretty useless. Instead contact your local councillor (list on the council website) and they are usually much better at getting things like this resolved.

 

Good luck,

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

abc123def,

 

I don't think any estate agent could sell a six foot square room as a bed! There is something about this in the Housing Act, I think, so try googling that with overcrowding. I'm almost sure there is a minimum square footage involved in classing a room as a bedroom.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've looked in to it. There is nothing in the housing act that says a bedroom has to be a minimum size to be a bedroom but it says what the minimum size must be to house/sleep 2, 3, etc. people. But for a single person, under the stairs and Harry Potter, that'll do it would seem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having moved lots as private tenants, we've seen many houses for rent - and many newer builds in the area, don't even have one bedroom that is 10 x 7. I remember the last time we were looking we went to see a two bed house with a surprisingly low rent. We were feeling optimistic till we saw it - the whole downstairs would fit in my current living room (15 x 10) with room to spare. The main bedroom upstairs could fit a 4'6 bed and one bedside cabinet, it had a small built in closet (smaller than a double wardrobe). The other bedroom you could fit a single bed and a bedside table, it also had a small built in closet. The bathroom was so small you had to almost get in the bath to be able to shut the door behind you. Needless to say we passed on that house.

 

I know that older social housing generally has larger bedrooms, but in newer social housing, if there were a minimum size for a bedroom, some properties would have to be reclassified as zero bedroom properties.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

that speye character does come up with some interesting theories, the only problem is that the theories are based upon fallacies, so are unlikely to be of much use to many (if any)

 

snugs1235

your situation appears to be such that you may have a good chance of a discretionary housing payment to top up your HB, however these are means tested and it will depend upon your income, outgoings and capital

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that speye character does come up with some interesting theories, the only problem is that the theories are based upon fallacies, so are unlikely to be of much use to many (if any)

 

 

I totally agree, having looked at the legislation!

 

Locally here we must go against the norm then as my old LA house is tiny, it may have 3 bedrooms but 1 is teensie, and the only living room is less than 5 foot wide and 12 foot long. My brother lives in a 2 bedroom new build HA house and his house is twice the size of mine. He can fit a family around the dining table and sit people on sofas all on the same day. The difference here is gardens. I could keep a multi-tude of lifestock and have play areas and garden areas if I were well enough or allowed, where as he can hang his washing out on a rotary airer and sit out there only if there is no washing on the line at the time. Mind, having been homeless twice and moved 3 times all within 2 years, I am VERY grateful for my house, small though it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree, having looked at the legislation!

 

Locally here we must go against the norm then as my old LA house is tiny, it may have 3 bedrooms but 1 is teensie, and the only living room is less than 5 foot wide and 12 foot long. My brother lives in a 2 bedroom new build HA house and his house is twice the size of mine. He can fit a family around the dining table and sit people on sofas all on the same day. The difference here is gardens. I could keep a multi-tude of lifestock and have play areas and garden areas if I were well enough or allowed, where as he can hang his washing out on a rotary airer and sit out there only if there is no washing on the line at the time. Mind, having been homeless twice and moved 3 times all within 2 years, I am VERY grateful for my house, small though it is.

 

I've seen some really small 1960's builds. The LA house I lived in as a kid was huge with 3 double bedrooms, dining room, large kitchen, utility, 30 ft garden and garage. The point I was making was that if a minimum size for what constituted a 'bedroom' was set in law, then many properties would not be able to be advertised as having any bedrooms at all.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

thank you all so much for the information. I will write another letter to the council today. I rent from the council, so they should have all of the information.

 

I will send the letter to the head person and number specific questions I think, that way hopefully I will get some kind of personalised reply. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/100000-scots-to-cash-in-on-bedroom-tax-loophole.20243112

 

 

GAA believes it is possible for tenants to change the use of what might be regarded as a spare bedroom into something that need not be counted as a bedroom, and therefore not be subject to the 14% cut in housing benefit.

 

"This is of major application for disabled tenants, who may use a 'spare bedroom' for the purpose of therapy, storing wheelchairs, medical equipment or to undertake medical procedures. Other tenants may be able to avoid the bedroom tax too.

 

I have just seen this article in the twitter feed - I appreciate that this is in Scotland - could those in England use the same kind of loophole ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a quote from Speye Joe's very informative latest post "My earlier posts where I discussed minimum bedroom sizes (MBS) in terms of a bedroom needing to be 70 square feet to be a single bedroom and anything less than 50 square feet is not a bedroom are APPLICABLE ONLY TO A PRIVATE PROPERTY assessment and not ORDINARILY to a social property and this is also unfair and discriminates against the social tenant and gain calls into question the entire bedroom tax process" Post is at http://speye.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/bedroom-tax-significant-new-developments-and-challenges-emerge/ I'm beginning to think if councils start charging people for the bedroom tax and asking them to move they'll be doing so unlawfully. Huge compensation claims ahoy!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

SNUGS1235

 

in your case, there appears to be two avenues

 

option 1

your landlord agrees to reclassify your home as a one bedroom property - this would result in your rent decreasing to 1BR rate instead of 2BR rate - and protection from bedroom tax

 

option 2

your landlord does not agree to reclassify your home as a one bedroom property - this would result in you being subject to bedroom tax - but possibly could get a Discretionary Housing Payment to help you

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law re housing benefits in Scotland is not a devolved matter. The advice given by the Glasgow Advice Agency applies equally in any part of the UK. Ultimately the final decision rests with your local council whichever part of the country you live in. Your council would be hard pressed to justify calling the room you describe a bedroom.

 

Note that there is no strict legal definition of "bedroom". One would suppose that as a basic minimum there should be a bed and the room is suitable for sleeping in.

 

The new regulations clearly and repeatedly stress "bedroom" If a room is used for any other purpose than that which is reasonably associated with bedrooms then it is not a bedroom. By the logic used in the regulations if you were to empty your front room and put a bed in there then this could be classed as a bedroom and you could be asked to pay for it or lose benefits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...