Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credits £5000 demand!!


spinningfish
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3240 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

During the tax years of 2010 and 2011, I claimed Working Tax Credit as I was self-employed, on a low income and worked the required amount of hours.

 

Last year HMRC decided to review my case, and as I was not being paid an hourly rate, and being paid a lump sum per invoice, I was no longer entitled to WTC, even though I could easily show I was working the required number of hours weekly.

 

I did not have the stomach, nor the time, to keep arguing the toss with them so allowed my WTC to stop.

 

Just yesterday a bill from HMRC for just shy of £5,000 landed on my mat, asking for immediate payback or debt collection! Being self-employed they all my address details and this is the first bit of correspondence I've had asking for payback to something I was genuinely entitled to!!

 

They have not given me the option to contest this on the letter, but I darn well will. I didn't steal this money - I needed it when business was waning and I have worked bloody hard to improve my business in challenging times.

 

Hopefully, one of you lovely people can offer some advice of where to begin...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that.

 

It's not something I know a lot about, but I'd have thought you're entitled to see how they've worked out the amount they say is owed. I think it's worth asking. Is there a contact number on the letter they sent you?

 

I wonder if the CAB might have experience of dealing with this sort of thing. Sometimes they can speak to HMRC for you.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hang on I had a Revenue Demand once for £5,000, as I had started part time business after not making much money after 18 months I gave up but held accounts for the period, I then received one of those demands, and went into to Revenue and pointed out the accounts for that period and they copies and stated well the £5,000 was a general figure for which we expect to be adjusted in regards of actual circumstances/accounts and relevant allowances. Basically it is a figure they churn out as they have no [previous idea of any figure to start on, so you will have to shows invoice details etc. no doubt. They wrote mine off as it was a break even situation.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello there

 

I was fully entitled to and received WTC during 2010 and 2011.

 

Last year, out of the blue, I received a demand for nearly £5,000 for allegedly overpaid WTC during 2010-2011. I thought this was odd and called them and they advised they didn't receive my proof of entitlement at the time. Very strange as they had had everything at the time. I sent it all in again and didn't hear from them again, so thought that was that.

 

Last week I received the same demand again and couldn't believe it. They have had all my proof twice now, but the only communication I get seems to be a yearly demand.

 

To add insult to injury, they have already passed my account to debt collectors Fredrickson International, who are also bombarding me with texts and calls.

 

To say I'm livid is an understatement!! I seemingly need to trawl through all my 3-4 year old paperwork AGAIN!

 

I need to deal with this once and for all, so was wondering what my best course of action is? I would like to communicate with someone more senior at HMRC. It's really not on!!

 

Any help would be very much appreciated.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the info guys. I sent two letters to HMRC - one a dispute letter (see below) and an SAR. Both signed for on the 14th July 2014.

 

The crux of the dispute letter was the following:

 

"I dispute responsibility for all alleged tax credit overpayments in my name. Please provide a complete breakdown of how these alleged overpayments occurred, what changes and calculations were made to these awards, where you got the information from for these calculations and all other figures involved including current balances.

 

As I am now disputing the alleged overpayments, all threats to pursue ‘further action’ must now cease as per your own code of practice (COP26)."

 

Guess who's still calling and texting? Guess you sent me a Letter Before Action this morning? You got it - Fredricksons.

 

There are words I'd like to use to describe them, but I'd offend even the hardest of ears...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info guys. I sent two letters to HMRC - one a dispute letter (see below) and an SAR. Both signed for on the 14th July 2014.

 

The crux of the dispute letter was the following:

 

"I dispute responsibility for all alleged tax credit overpayments in my name. Please provide a complete breakdown of how these alleged overpayments occurred, what changes and calculations were made to these awards, where you got the information from for these calculations and all other figures involved including current balances.

 

As I am now disputing the alleged overpayments, all threats to pursue ‘further action’ must now cease as per your own code of practice (COP26)."

 

Guess who's still calling and texting? Guess you sent me a Letter Before Action this morning? You got it - Fredricksons.

 

There are words I'd like to use to describe them, but I'd offend even the hardest of ears...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont just ignore them. If they take you to court they would likely win.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont just ignore them. If they take you to court they would likely win.

 

Another poster above suggests I ignore them, so now I'm a bit confused.

 

Also, how would they win in court if my evidence stacks up that I was fully entitled, I've sent my evidence before, and was ignored, and I am disputing this. Surely there must be something in law that if it under dispute recovery action should be stayed?

 

If I contact these people I will have to make payments, effectively acknowledging a debt I don't acknowledge!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. Keep pushing to find out how they came about to the amount you allegedly owe. If DCA's come on the scene, tell them to do one. Freds are one of the lowest rated DCA's and rely on threats and intimidation. They couldnt care less about what you say.

 

All they see is the big number on the spreadsheet and they get greedy.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope. Keep pushing to find out how they came about to the amount you allegedly owe. If DCA's come on the scene, tell them to do one. Freds are one of the lowest rated DCA's and rely on threats and intimidation. They couldnt care less about what you say.

 

All they see is the big number on the spreadsheet and they get greedy.

 

Thanks for the advice. How do I go about telling them to naff off and is it them I should be asking how they arrived at that amount?

 

Really appreciate your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a prove it letter or keep pushing with HMRC. It is their responsibility to prove you owe a debt. Not yours to prove you dont.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys

 

Had the SAR pack back, plus phone recordings. Got a load of stuff to go through, but the phone recordings pretty much are just myself calling with other enquiries, so nothing to report there.

 

HMRC have NOT responded to my dispute letter, despite it being signed for back in July. Fredrickson continue to bother me with calls every day, but I've now started making small payments directly to HMRC.

 

Should I write again, or initiate some kind of an escalation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Had the SAR pack back, plus phone recordings. Got a load of stuff to go through, but the phone recordings pretty much are just myself calling with other enquiries, so nothing to report there.

 

HMRC have NOT responded to my dispute letter, despite it being signed for back in July. Fredrickson continue to bother me with calls every day, but I've now started making small payments directly to HMRC.

 

Should I write again, or initiate some kind of an escalation?

 

The normal tax credit helpline can check the progress of any dispute and advice of current timescales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

So, after four months they finally replied to my dispute letter and it looks as though they're giving me the option to prove I was working 30 hours per week. In fact, this is the first time that I have actually got to the bottom of why they decided I was ineligible. They claimed they had never received any proof, despite me sending it in twice.

 

The question is, how on earth do I prove everything I did during a working day four years ago? I know what I did, because it's the same as I do now. Can I prove it? With difficulty.

 

Letter below:

RCletter.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...