Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you 😊  Just wanted to prepare myself mentally incase they pull out some rabbit out of a hat with these bodyshops as they will most likely be places they've used regularly in the past and over 150miles away from where I am.
    • I see the Brexit-ish are again delaying  implementing their 'grate deal' 'protecting the UKs borders' that they pressed through with the wholehearted support of MPs like smugg - who is now one of the main moaners saying this inflation raising and business destroying 'great deal'  shouldn't be implemented. Of course 3 of the benefits of NOT implementing the Brexitish grate deal as the Brexitish negotiated are:   1. Less UK businesses will collapse 2. UK inflation NOT increased by 0.6% (hence fiddling the figures to us scraping NOT being in a Brexit generated recession) 3. The problems will be dumped in labours lap after the GE   "Analysis by specialist credit insurance firm Allianz Trade said the removal of tariffs on the goods would reduce inflation by 0.6 percentage points, and cut import costs by close to 7 billion pounds ($8.8 billion) in nominal terms."   reuters.com WWW.REUTERS.COM     https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-economy-grows-by-01-february-2024-04-12/   Rees-Mogg warns post-Brexit border charges could be inflationary WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM According to reports, Britain faces a £2 billion post-Brexit bill on European food imports from the end of the month.  
    • Thank you . Please stand by for a reply later on  
    • Sorry just get worried that they will make my life harder than they already have lol   Bought the car around 12th Sept 2022 for £78,000 from clinkard cars.   Performance, Prestigious and Specialist cars in Romsey, Hampshire | Clinkard Performance Cars WWW.CLINKARDCARS.CO.UK Performance, Prestigious and Specialist cars Dealers in Romsey, Hampshire Was a 2019 Range Rover with 25k miles, £20k deposit at £750pm pcp over a 4 year period.   Finance company are alphera (bmw finance) spoke to them in October 2023 about the damage my bodyshop advised me of but they told me to deal with the dealership. Paid for the repair myself as I was told the extended warranty I paid for (recommended through dealer) wouldn't cover it as it was an existing fault and not mechanical breakdown. When I got the £40k offer from the dealership they still didn't want to get involved unless I got an independent inspection done. Used Elite Forensic inspections as they seem highly rated online (more comprehensive than your average AA inspection). I just looked online for thr best inspections for customers eho hsbe alre purchased the car. Their report was super comprehensive over like 50 pages of text and photos. Comparisons to the advert photos against what the inspector saw made in clear that the damage was before I purchase it. Got the report back 10th Jan 2024 and couldn't believe that they'd picked up the level of accident the car had been in and raised an official complaint through Alphera, they couldn't come to a decision with 8 weeks so raised with FOS. Around the 7th March 2024. Small issues started within the first week of purchasing like ambient light not working on the side the car was hit and car randomly switching off completely when I'd stop at traffic lights/junctions. Dealers eventually got this sorted which I appreciate, but doesn't change the fact that they didn't check the car as well as I'd been told it had been checked and they'd sold me an accident repaired car and initially tried to say all cars have had paint due to stone chips etc. Also turns out the car had only had 1 service before I serviced the car in mid 2023 (when the service light came on the car).   So far Clinkard have had my car for nearly a month (so my wife and I hsve had yo share cars since), they've said we've taken the far to 2x garages so far to inspect it and got 1 more garage to take it to. Currently refusing to tell me what those 2 garages have said so far with the attitude of because you've gone through FOS we have to follow the correct channels and respond to the complaint through them which is quite annoying.
    • This has been playing on my mind a little so been reading. Am I right in saying that if the original debt was regulated under the CCA and below 25k they can't use HCEO? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Contravention: 01 Parked in a restricted street


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I parked my car on single yellow line in an emergency for going to medical store because my wife is pregnant.

 

I went inside the shop and ask for the medicine but they said you need to consult with your midwife and I just came outside the shop.

 

This all took not more than 90 seconds and when I came outside the officer said you are late.

 

A PCN has been issued to you, at that time he was still writing PCN,

he said why you parked here and why you left your daughter unattended in the car,

 

please take this PCN and you have to pay £65,

 

when I refused to take PCN then he said ok its up-to you we have taken the pictures and we can send you by post if you like,

because I was definitely sure that the pictures can't be taken in less than 2 minutes so I asked him to send by post.

 

Today I received NTO with penalty charge of £130 without any pictures after 1 month and 3 days.

 

My questions:

1) The observation period for "01 contravention" is 5 minutes, can they issue if contravention was less than 5 minutes. how can they prove this?

2) The officer said, take this PCN and pay £65 then how that amount become £130 by post. how does it possible? On Newham website it clearly state that

 

newham.gov.uk/ParkingAndTransport/PenaltyChargeNotices%28PCNs%29/PCNLevelsJuly12007.htm

 

"A penalty charge notice level of £130 applies to all 'serious' contraventions. You can reduce the charge to £65 by paying within 14 days (if issued by a civil enforcement officer) or 21 days (if issued by a camera operator)."

3) He said he has taken the pictures, I am receiving this NTO after 1 month and 3 days without any pictures, why he lied with me?

4) there is no discount period and they are asking me to pay full £130 in 28 days.

 

Should I pay this amount or do you think I should try to go for representations for atlest reduce charge.

 

Thanks

ifti

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally you would expect an observation time longer than 90 seconds. However CEOs can't generally falsify this. They press a button on their hand-held gardgets which logs the time - they can't change it.

 

What observation time are they claiming to have?

 

Did he hand you a PCN at the time, or attach one to the vehicle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jamberson for your reply. Please see attached NOT. Answers to your questions

1) the time was 12:10pm but it doesn't showing any duration.

2) he asked me to take the PCN by hand or if you won't take then we will send you by post, I asked him to send by post because I was sure he hasn't taken any pictures yet and he is trying so I can accept and take the PCN.

 

Questions:

 

  1. Can I ask council for picture proof or is it not required?
  2. Do you know why there is no reduce charge period as it clearly mentioned on council website? I never received any such notice where there is no relaxation of reduce charge.

Your help will be appreciated.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41632[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't bother asking for proof. It's a waste of time.

 

The reason there is no discount is because this is a Notice to Owner. According to your description of what happened, the CEO did not attach a PCN to the vehicle, nor did he hand one to you. So you should heva been served with a PCN by post, rather than an NTO.

 

There are two issues to appeal on, then.

 

1. No PCN was served to you. Give your version of events and point out that you ought not to have been issued an NTO and that this constitutes impropriety,

 

2. Say that if the CEO has falsified a statement to the effect that he did serve the NTO, and they then refuse to believe what you have said, nevertheless the PCN is invalid because you are entitled to a loading exemption on yellow lines, and time to allow passengers to board the vehicle - and no observation time was given.

 

I am assuming of course that there never was a PCN attached to the vehicle. And I am assuming that these were just straight-forward yellow lines. I think you have a very good chance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again for your help Jamberson. oh Ok, I think I understand now what's the difference between PCN and NTO. There was no PCN attached to the vehicle. They have given me option 1) as you mentioned but used option 2) and sent me NTO. Regarding yellow lines, I'll try to take some pics and will post here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The key thing about the yellow lines is that there are not chevrons on the kerb, and you did not have your wheels hanging over the end into a parking bay, or something. Just straight-forward yellow lines is simple!

 

You're right. The PCN is what gets stuck to the vehicle, and there is also a postal version for people who drive off before it is served. Since you did not have one handed to you nor attached to the vehicle, nor posted to you, you've just simply not had a PCN - so they can't now send you an NTO! It's a strong line of appeal - unless the CEO has said in his notes that he did hand it to you - hence you should appeal on both grounds as I mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...