Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA Fraud, is there an email to report it to?


annonboy01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4088 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Long story short, my ex has been claiming High rate mobility and medium rate care for 4 years, shes never had an assessment, it was granted to her for chronic fatigue syndrome and the only evidence was a GP letter.

 

I had no reason to disbelieve her, she always walked with 2 sticks and on outing made me push her in a wheelchair, during the night I'd need to help her use the toilet and before work, i'd help her out of bed and to get dressed.

 

My friends all told me that I was being taken for a mug and there was actually nothing wrong with her and they knew it, I of course , back my ex , as at the time, I had no reason at all to disbelieve her.

 

However, since we have split, family and friends have provided me with 4 videos of her walking, some distance, without her sticks, at a brisk pace and clearly not suffering any pain (She used to visually show it)

 

Is there an email address I can pass these onto the DWP on ? I know there's an online form, but these video's cant be added to an online form.

 

I might sound bitter, but im not, benefit fraud is something I am simply against 100%, she might have recovered since we split and thats fine, but shes still driving the same motability issued car and using her blue badge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me that people are stirring. DLA is usually given for a fixed period of time. It may be that there has been an improvement which should be reported as a change of circumstances. If it were me i would just report you suspect there has been an improvement.

Yes you are right to say benefit fraud is benefit fraud but it does sound as if you are being manipulated. If your family have shown you these videos why haven't they reported her?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the videos, so its not really stirring TBH

 

It's clear that I have been taken for a ride , They have not reported her because they wanted it to be my choice, so that I didnt blame them.

 

When someone claims to be unable to get out of bed daily, for 4 years, then the next thing is they are in a supermarket , bending, stretching, then carrying lots of bags in their arms, then walking totally unaided etc etc, the proof is there really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Long story short, my ex has been claiming High rate mobility and medium rate care for 4 years, shes never had an assessment, it was granted to her for chronic fatigue syndrome and the only evidence was a GP letter.

 

I had no reason to disbelieve her, she always walked with 2 sticks and on outing made me push her in a wheelchair, during the night I'd need to help her use the toilet and before work, i'd help her out of bed and to get dressed.

 

My friends all told me that I was being taken for a mug and there was actually nothing wrong with her and they knew it, I of course , back my ex , as at the time, I had no reason at all to disbelieve her.

 

However, since we have split, family and friends have provided me with 4 videos of her walking, some distance, without her sticks, at a brisk pace and clearly not suffering any pain (She used to visually show it)

 

Is there an email address I can pass these onto the DWP on ? I know there's an online form, but these video's cant be added to an online form.

 

I might sound bitter, but im not, benefit fraud is something I am simply against 100%, she might have recovered since we split and thats fine, but shes still driving the same motability issued car and using her blue badge.

 

They probably won't be able to use the videos in the investigation, but you can report it by either phoning 0800 854440 or completing the online form on

http:campaigns.dwp.gov.uk/campaigns/benefit-thieves/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is it that you had no reason to disbelieve her and now 4 videos of isolated events seem to have convinced you otherwise?

 

Why were these videos made? Why were they supplied to you? Are these so called friends who told you there was nothing wrong with her qualified medical professionals with access to her notes and party to her care plan?

 

If I were you then the first thing I would do would be to contact her directly and get her side of the story. Tell her about the videos, show them to her and give her the opportunity to take control of the situation rather than sneaking about behind her back and risking massive repercussions you may not have considered. What happens if you report her and some jobsworth sells the videos to the Daily Mail to "teach her a lesson"?

 

Nice the way the DWP provide a freephone number for reporting benefit fraud and refuse to supply numbers to benefit claimants that are included in call plans despite steering group recommendations that such numbers should be provided. Shows you where their priorities lie.

 

If you're really dead set against benefit fraud then maybe you'd like to consider directing your anger at the predatory corporations stealing public money under the auspices of the Work Program. See

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sad fact is, the videos are all one month apart ,showing that it's not just a day, like I say, she's never walked un aided before, be it sticks or a wheelchair

 

I know that genuine disabled people are being taken off DLA unfairly

 

but this runs much deeper, I know it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

talking to her isnt an option, she just hurls abuse, I got out because for years she was physically, emotionally and financially abusing me tbh.

 

She isnt the type of person you can have a chat to , everything is ultra defensive mode.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was in reply to someone who asked if the people had seen her care plan

 

It's pretty pro DLA here and for those who are genuine, I agree, but if actions like this stop it getting to the genuine, then surly , it needs stopping

Link to post
Share on other sites

Annonboy, you dont say how long you cared for her, was it for the 4 years (or longer) that she's had these illnesses and claimed DLA? If so, how could she fool someone for 4 plus years? Also her GP would not prescribe morphine patches without good reason. I really think you need more than 4 random videos, also, as you have been caring for her, then it may possibly implicate you.

 

Think very carefully before doing something you may regret and could well be nothing more than malicious tittle tattle.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

When someone controls you , your money, the fact you cant have friends, speak to relatives , leave the house, other than to work , then its pretty clear to me that they are very manipulative, I was with her when she got the patches from her GP, the conversation was short and sweet

 

"Im in loads of pain, depressed by it, cant move, nothing else has worked (prescribed pain killers) what can I have stronger"

 

The GP then put her on morphine patches and that has stayed the same in all that time.

 

I understand it looks like I am an accomplice, but when I wasnt permitted access to my own bank account, either my debit card, or online account, I was regally beaten if I even dare asked for more than my £5 allowance (She has been changed for assault ) then there has to be mitigating circumstances in all this

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you decide that you wish to report her the best way for you to do so is on line. You can google report benefit fraud and its probably one of the first things that comes up.

 

I think that it is quite a long form but there is a part towards the end that you could say that you have this information - the only problem with this would be that you would have to give your contact details for the investigator to get in touch with you. This doesn't mean that your ex would find out who had reported her as that should be kept as confidential. They may decide not to contact you but that would not mean that they are not taking the investigation forward.

 

They would probably not use your video's as evidence but it would give them some indication as to whether or not they should launch a full investigation and gather their own evidence independently.

 

Only you can decide what is the best thing to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you describe about the abuse you were under Annon is shocking, however, I have read your Child Benefit thread, and it may be worth thinking what the affect any investigation may have on your children, especially if your ex's wife's GP has prescribed and I assume she is using the morphine patches and he has further written a letter stating she is suffering from these illnesses.

 

By what you have described, its great that you are now free of this woman and that hopefully you can start building a new future for you and your children.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to faslify dates on videos, how do you know they are true? Example below.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238294/Speeding-motorist-faked-CCTV-try-dodge-fine-caught-shadows-footage.html#axzz2JwvTDgvx

 

Those videos will not be sufficient evidence. I agree with the others, if you send them in you are proving that you are a bitter ex as you saw nothing, whereas the person who made the videos could report what they personally saw. It's not your job, what you are actually know is nothing, all you have is hearsay and some videos which could easily be falsified.

 

You can tell the people who showed you the videos to do what they like with them, but to leave you out of it. Let the legal system be justice for any charges you bring against your ex, these are the things that are your business and that you do know about; nothing else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doctors are loathed to provide morphine these days thanks to our friend Harold Shipman. As they are a controlled drug they will be audited as well.

I do not doubt you were an abused partner but frankly the evidence is very scant.

In my opinion,if you want to report her do that but let them investigate.

I also suggest that you might need some support as i am afraid some people allow themselves to be manipulated and abused. I loved my late wife very much and on a good day she would admit that she knew exactly what buttons to press to get the required response. We were separated for 10 years and i was still never free of her and this annoyed my current partner very much.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son was reported by someone who felt he did not deserve DLA and we have been to hell and back even though his doctors have given statements in his defence. His gp and specialists have had to give no end of their time because someone decided that he was prescribed medication that he did not need by telling the doctors the other stuff did not kill the pain just as you have said. This is still going on for us and I am sure others are still going through the same due to people thinking they know better than doctors. As already said morphine is never given out that easily there has to be something genuinely wrong and I would think her doctors would back her up on this. I for one feel that when anyone reports someone they should be prepared to stand up and be counted. You will find they will not be able to use your videos either as they are supposed to use their own if they decide to prosecute we were told this by two solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No one on here knows what your ex has put on her claim or review forms. If you report her the investigators will use these forms to see if an offence is taking place. Like myself & kk3852 have already said, its doubtful they will be able to use the videos as part of the investigation, but if you leave your details at the end of the form they may decide to contact you about them.

 

If you also provide info on any regular appointments, shopping trips etc, where she could be observed this would enable the investigators to obtain their own video evidence, which in turn can be used to help prove or disprove the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...