Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI with The Money Group refused refund


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well here goes

 

I took out a re-mortgage back in 2003 and PPI was added along with a life insurance policy also a month later in 2004

 

I had a top up loan with the same company we did this on thier advice which was have a smaller re-mortgage and then add the top up straight away as this would be easier to approve ?

 

this was obviously for them to increase thier fees and profits as they added another PPI policy to the top up

 

not long afer we reapid the both loans in full and I forgot all about the policys, untill the other day when

 

I came across the paper work again and realised id been fleeced.

 

I used one of the templates from the site to request a refund and today got the reply That the policy was taken out over 6 years ago

so was statute barred also it was before the date that the FOS was involved

so they would be unlikely to help,

 

any ideas would be appreciated

 

jdene

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Forgot to say in thier reply they gave me the underwriters details for CIGNA but the address they gave was for Belgium,

 

I had spoken to cigna before contacting the money group and they were extremely helpfull

gave me all the details and refrence numbers

but the office i contacted was in england not belgium

 

is this a delay tactic by the money group ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you please convert your document to a pdf - follow instructions below - as it is a wee bit tiny at the moment :)

 

Dx100 – Instructions on uploading pdfs

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

outside of 6yrs...

 

there is NO TIME LIMIT ON PPI RECLAIMS.

 

litlle spoofers!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the original documents relating to the loans and insurances which is where i got the figures from but my calculations for the intrest may be out, not 100% if i used the correct formula.

jdene

Link to post
Share on other sites

[EDIT]

 

the limitations act does NOT apply to PPI

the FSA would really LOVE to see that letter

 

i suggest you write back

 

including the FSA statement

and fact that the FOS clearly state that if the complainant has all the documents [and you have]

 

they should not

simply look for EXCUSES

to fob off PPI complainants.

 

tell her you have fwded her letter to the FSA awaitng a reply too.

 

have you all the statements

 

they obv have info on their systems

 

did you sar them?

 

dx

Edited by alanfromderby

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx100uk thank you for your reply, I will do as you have suggested,

 

I dont have all the statements and i have not SAR them,

but i have the documents from the mortgage I took out after them showing the payments made to clear both loans,

these also proove that no reimbursement was made of any of the premiums.

 

Can you tell me where I can get a copy of the FSA statement to refer them to it please,

or any other legislation that prooves they are acting against the FSA and the FOS.

 

Regards

jdene

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont think the lady likes me

 

this is the reply i recieved from her today,

she only included the documets for the one insurance and not the life cover or the other ppi

and it shows clearly the cover only lasts for part of the life of the loan and I think it only applied to the loans taken out at the same time

which means it would not pay out after the loan was repaid.

 

and the sales rep definately told us they would not give us the loan without the insurances

despite what thier documents say, maybe they would have but we were told different.

 

They dont seem to be willing to change thier stance and I wonder how many they have managed to put off claiming thier insurance back.

Any help with the next step would be appreciated

 

jdene

Link to post
Share on other sites

take the letter apart bit by bit by bit

 

sec 32c limitations act for a start! 'a mistake' WHEN YOU BECAME AWARE.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont think the lady likes me

 

this is the reply i recieved from her today,

she only included the documets for the one insurance and not the life cover or the other ppi

and it shows clearly the cover only lasts for part of the life of the loan and I think it only applied to the loans taken out at the same time

which means it would not pay out after the loan was repaid.

 

and the sales rep definately told us they would not give us the loan without the insurances

despite what thier documents say, maybe they would have but we were told different.

 

They dont seem to be willing to change thier stance and I wonder how many they have managed to put off claiming thier insurance back.

Any help with the next step would be appreciated

 

jdene

 

Hello jdene,

 

IMO I believe you should not mess about with these people as they will keep fobbing you off and giving legal argument to your claim for mis sold PPI. I would gather all your information to date, all of your consumer gredit agreements, letters and any other information you have in relation to your complaint of mis selling PPI. Lodge a case with the FOS.

 

Please follow this link to a multitude of more links that may help you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?135060-Mis-sold-PPI-Want-your-money-back-use-these-links-to-help

 

Do not be fobbed off by [EDIT] legal persons who write snotty letters. They get paid to stop you getting your due money back.

 

Fight on.

 

aa

Edited by alanfromderby

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember a complaint to the FOS will automatically result in a fee to Money group of £850 to take on the case you may like to inform them of the action you intend to take.

 

The £850 figure comes from IMS21 it used to be £500 when I was last involved with CAG.

 

Good luck we are with you.

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting things together for theFOS complaint but would love to send a good reply to that last letter i recieved, but struggling with the legal arguments .

 

jdene

Edited by alanfromderby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Could someone give me a few pointers on a reply to the last letter recieved please, just think the tone of thier reply justifies a response answering the points she has raised, any help would be appreciated.

Regards

 

jdene

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i meant to try last night but we've wild snow

and that had me busy

 

1st this winter too

 

still snowing now!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dear miss....

thank you blah blah..

I am rather concerned that for someone with LLB Hons & 8yrs of responsibility over handling PPI complaints & p'haps a even a team, mis quotes the statute of limitation

and in deed the advise contained on the FOS and FSA websites concernig PPI.

In relation to PPI,

the correct is 32b

Section 32(1)(b) of the 1980 Limitation Act postpones the commencement of the limitation period where

in case of fraud, concealment or mistake.

 

In such cases,

“the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the claimant has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.”

the rest of the letter is pure speculation that the correct process did take place.

she was NOT THERE IN THE ROOM

when the advisor told you you had to have it.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...