Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim Form DLC/Hillies old-MBNA credit card *** Settled by Tomlin Order***


Alloyz1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 301
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I havent the time at the moment Alloyz....... if as you state..... how sure you are .....then it makes no odds my thoughts....simply add the latest developments as advise.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

Do I still need to put some narrative in section 10, and also tick the WS box when attaching the WS?

 

Think the answer is yes, but want to make sure. Was thinking about this Andy:-

 

 

I am making this application promptly; and within 7 days of service of the order. Service being 22nd July.

 

I have not been served with either the application or the supporting evidence the claimant refers to, contrary to CPR 23.9.

 

I received the claimants Particulars of Claim; and submitted a defense putting the claimant to strict proof to show they have a legal right by way of the Consumer Credit Agreement and Terms and Conditions applicable as shown in exhibit [DJC Defense 1] para 3(a) and show service of a Valid Default Notice as shown in exhibit [DJC Defense 1] para 3(b) . The Claimant has not provided such proof. The documents I have received; and disclosed to the court within their Application to Lift the Stay and Strike out my Defense, are not pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 or the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561)as detailed below:

 

Default Notice:

By s88 (2) of the Consumer Credit Act, as amended by s14 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 2006 as from 1 October 2006, a valid Default Notice must have a specified remedy of breach date within the document. The specified date must ‘not be less than 14 days’ “after the date of service” of the default notice. The 14 day period was also required by paragraph 3© of Schedule 2 of the Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561) as amended.

 

The date given in exhibit [MBNA1] by which the default could be remedied was ‘before 26th Feb 2010’ meaning at the latest 25th Feb 2010, which is allowing only 13 days and less than the 14 days required by s88 (2).

 

Agreement & Terms and Conditions:

A valid credit Agreement must contain certain terms within the signature document The Consumer Credit Act 1974 s.60(1)(2).

 

These core terms are the credit limit, repayment terms and the rate of interest The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553 (Column 2 schedule 6). These are ‘Prescribed Terms’.

 

Prescribed terms must be within the signature document The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553 (6 Signing of Agreement).

 

The Agreement must contain all the prescribed terms and be signed by both the debtor and on behalf of the creditor The Consumer Credit Act 1974 s.61(1)(a).

 

The court shall not make an enforcement order under s65(1) if s61(1)(a) (signing of Agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the Agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner) The Consumer Credit Act 1974 s127(3)

 

It is submitted the strict proof request within my defence has not been satisfied; and subsequently my Witness Statement attached, will show the Claimant cannot prove their legal right to the claim. My Witness Statement goes into fact and details with regards the non-compliance with multiple regulations of the documents provided which is fatal to the Claimants case.

 

My Witness Statement is not based on arguable matters, unwinnable on merit, which were misconceived or, on facts pleaded bound to fail; it is based on points of law and fact. Given this, my defence has real prospects of success in defending the claim; and the Claimant has been; and will be, unable to prove their legal right to the relief claimed.

 

May I respectfully request that the order be set aside.

 

 

Thanks for your time Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a short narrative in section 10 and the CPR pursuant to your request...the above is fine and succinct Alloyz.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget to include your Draft Order for set a side and strike out with the relevant CPR PDs...I really have to be else where now:sad:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say 'draft order' do you mean the actual n244 form?

 

God i sound dumb! Apologies for the basic questions....

 

under section 3 on the N244 (What order are you asking the court to make and why, I have requested "an order to set aside under CPR 23.9 as my defence does have reasonable grounds to defend the claim; and to strike out the claimants claim under CPR 3.4(2)(a) as it discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim"

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question 4 on the N244 Alloyz.....

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now it makes sense why you previously said 'post up the draft order and I'll look over it'.... And I thought that was just the n244!!!

 

Apologies Andy...

 

Thanks again

 

A

Edited by Alloyz1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Struggling!!

 

Claim No: XXX

Date: XXXXX

In the Northampton (CCBC) County Court

XXX

CLAIMANT

-AND-

XXX

DEFENDANT

DRAFT ORDER FOR DIRECTIONS

1. The order, made on XXX 2013 by Deputy District Judge XXX sitting at XXX be set aside under CPR 23.9.

2 The defendants defence be struck out under CPR3.4(2)(a).

Edited by Alloyz1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Struggling!!

 

Claim No: XXX

Date: XXXXX

In the Northampton (CCBC) County Court

XXX

CLAIMANT

-AND-

XXX

DEFENDANT

DRAFT ORDER FOR DIRECTIONS

1. The order, made on XXX 2013 by Deputy District Judge XXX sitting at XXX be set aside.

2 The defendants defence be struck out.

 

Keep the faith Alloyz someone will be along to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by andyorch;

The Draft needs to be properly formatted correctly...... format as follows:-

 

 

 

Edit to suit

 

 

#### START OF ORDER ####

 

In the ......... county court

Claim No. ...

 

Before

 

District Judge ………

 

 

Dated ……… 20…

 

 

Claimant A

 

and

 

Defendant B

 

 

 

Draft/ORDER

 

 

UPON reading the Claimant’s application notice dated [ ] and the witness statements filed by the parties

 

AND UPON hearing the Claimant and Counsel for the Defendant

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

1. The Claimant be granted summary judgment on the whole of the claim and the counter claim by the Defendant struck out.

2. The Defendant do pay to the Claimant forthwith the sum of £[ ] in respect of the claim.

3. The Defendant do pay the Claimant’s costs of the claim, in the sum of £[ ] within 14 days.

 

#### END OF ORDER ####

 

Fill in the gaps where ..... or [ ] is present.

 

 

 

 

 

amend the order to suit.Insert relevant CPR PDs that you make your order pursuant to.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Few questions when you get time please:

 

How do I know who the DJ is going to be, or does this refer to the judge who granted the order I wish to have set a side? Yes

 

Does this look okay? My bits in RED

 

In the ......... county court

Claim No. ...

 

Before

 

District Judge ………???? See above

 

 

Dated ………

 

 

Claimant A ME? No Alloyz you are the defendant

and

 

Defendant B Them?

 

 

 

Draft/ORDER

 

 

UPON reading the Claimant’s application notice which was dated 11 June 2013 which I recieved and accompanied the judgement; and reading the subsequent judgement entered on 17 July 2013

AND UPON hearing the Claimant and Counsel for the Defendant Do I include this as the application came with the judgement??[/color] I did state edit to suit

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

1. The order, made on 17th July 2013 by Deputy District Judge XXX sitting at XXX be set aside under CPR 23.9

2. The defendants Claimanst statement of case defence be struck out under CPR3.4(2)(a).

 

#### END OF ORDER ####

 

Thanks Andy

 

A

Edited by Alloyz1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Second Go:

 

In the Northampton (CCBC) County Court

 

Claim No: XXX

 

Before

 

District Judge XXX (the one who made the Judgement)

 

 

Dated XXX (Date the Judgement was granted))

 

 

XXX (Them)

Claimant

 

and

 

XXX

Defendant (Me)

 

 

 

Draft/ORDER

 

 

UPON reading the Claimant’s application notice which was dated 11 June 2013 and which was first recieved by the defendant with the judgement; and reading the subsequent judgement entered on 17 July 2013 without an hearing.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

1. The order, made on 17th July 2013 by Deputy District Judge XXX sitting at XXX be set aside under CPR 23.9.

2. The Claimanst statement of case be struck out under CPR3.4(2)(a).

3. Costs in this application

 

#### END OF ORDER ####

Edited by Andyorch
amended
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump ........see further amendments:thumb:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

alloyz

re no. 2 - shouldn't you be asking for the claimants (them) claim to be struck out, not your (the defendant) defence? or have i misread?

Link to post
Share on other sites

alloyz

re no. 2 - shouldn't you be asking for the claimants (them) claim to be struck out, not your (the defendant) defence? or have i misread?

 

I did amend it in post #189 in blue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it best to request a hearing or to allow the DJ to use their discretion?

 

It will require an hearing unless the Claimant is not objectionable to the application

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...