Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax CC Debt and 1st Credit problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4098 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

back in 2009 I did a CCA request with Halifax and after them failing to supply me with the relevant documentation

I was passed on to various collection agencies who in turn failed and returned it back to Halifax for resolution.

 

1st Credit however have failed to pass the dispute back to Halifax and have now lodged a default on my Credit file,

surely they cannot do this, I

have informed them numerous times that Halifax have failed to respond to my requests.

How would I get this removed?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they ownthe debt sadly they can.

 

however

if its been more than 6yrs [opps] since your last in/out

 

then they are on dodgy ground

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 Months in/out ?

 

I have no idea what you mean, I

thought that if an account was in dispute then the debt could not be sold/passed on?

- it seems like the banks can do as they please while ignoring legislation.

 

What can I do to remove this or even change it to dispute on my file?

 

This has been going on for over 12 months with 1st Credit and I have had the original sum of £2000 reduced to an offer from them to pay £600 for full payment,

 

I have asked them to take court action but they have so far declined,

but now I really need this default notice removing,

last correspondence I received from them was October last year.

 

Thanks.

Edited by seasidegirl
Link to post
Share on other sites

opps i meant 6yrs

 

when was YOUR last financial transaction?

 

if they are offering a discount

 

there is something wrong with it

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, last financial transaction was august 2009 and has been in dispute since october 2009,

 

the debt is unenforcable thats why they have made offers

 

- Halifax have failed to respond to my dispute yet 1st credit have said they now own the debt,

 

Halifax cannot sell the debt on while its in dispute

 

so therefore i am assuming that 1st credit have put the default on my credit file and they have no right at all.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ideally they should nt, but rarely abided by

 

if you are getting discount letters you need to find out the reason.

 

sar halifax

 

i suspect the OC defaulted it before the sale.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only checked on noddle but the only default is with 1st credit,

so what you're saying is that the banks can do as they please?

 

There has to be someone I can take this up with,

 

the banks are making a mockery of the system and the system/rules are put there to protect the average joe just like me and you.

 

What would be your course of action to have this removed?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just because 1st credit now has their name against the default

it does not mean they put it there , i very much doubt it.

 

when a debt is purchased, where the OC had their name

it is substituted with the new owners.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the date of the default on your file.

 

Did you ever receive a Notice of assignment?

 

Did you tell 1st credit the account was in dispute and why?

Thing anyone can say it's in dispute but it may not be a value one.

Remember as well that it is UE only for as long as HBOS can not provide an agreement unless the agreement they provide is flawed.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes It is in dispute, I provided all the information to 1st Credit regarding the dispute including times and dates and also that Halifax had failed to supply me with my agreement (all they sent was an application formthat was void of the prescribed terms), also reported them to trading standards for harrasment for pursuing the debt while in dispute.

I did receive a notice of assignment but told them to basically go away as the Halifax had failed to comply with my CCA request. I have a folder full of all the paperwork including an LBA I issued to a company of solicitors in leeds and they backed off and handed back to Halifax.

What would be my next step?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm not sure. Check the date of the default and if it is an old one then sit and wait it out. Each time They write just send a one liner back, i refer you to my letter dated xxxxxx where i told you it was in dispute. Make sure you include the line i do not acknowledge any debt.

Sit and wait it out what.

I assume this is pre April 2007

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can try.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect they will argue that while it may be unenforceable reporting to a credit reference agency is not enforcement. This is described in the McGuffick case by judge Flaux

 

Enforcement No Longer Includes:

Requesting or demanding payment

Sending you a default notice

Giving information relating to the account to any third

party, particularly credit reference agencies

Passing the account to a debt collection Agency or

assigning it to a Debt Purchaser.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

OC shoudnt be passing any data on if they know the account is in dispute..BUT they do !! Trying to get it off you CF will be a long slaught.I think the whole of CAG members have had the same ,,the more you let them know the more they will write to you ..IMO Id leave well alone..It will fall off your CF in 12 months or so ;)..im in the same situation with Halifax and 1st credit..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally within the agreement there is something about transfer of rights. I do not think you cam hide behind the DPA on this one. If in doubt email the ICO and ask.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...