Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/408156-cabotnolans-spc-claim-old-next-cat-debtclaim-dismissed/page/4/#comments https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/404240-arrowshoos-spc-old-newday-aqua-credit-card-debt-claim-dismissed-no-dn/page/4/#comments default notice win  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/407490-meiii-cabotnolans-spc-claim-old-yorkshire-bank-loan-2nd-claim-dismissed/  
    • It follows a public backlash after stores were told they could not sell items such as clothes. View the full article
    • With regard to your question on post 207 if you bring in the points that I made on the validity of the contract they are supposed to have with Peel holdings then mention that there are already doubts about the validity of the contracts that are being used by the PPCs and the OPS is a classic example. Once you are on there you should then try and get your other point in after that.   if it is in connection with the extra charge of £60 remind the Judge that the charge has been defined by many Court across England that the charge is an abuse of process which was covered in PE v Beavis at point 198    " The charge has to be and is set at a level which enables managers to recover the costs of operating the scheme"  IE the £100 charge covers all their expenses so nothing should be added.   as their WS claims an extra £60 that could be judged as perjurious since it is an additional sum that should be known by VCS and the author of the WS as a double recovery. Especially as they have already lost in Court for the same reason.   Another cause to prove that they do not comply with their Code of Conduct. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/CamScanner%2008-05-2020%2016.34.59.pdf  Byelaws are statutory not arbitrary as their WS said on no .42 .   Best of Luck.   The above URL does not work but this one does http://forums.National Consumer Service.com/index.php?showtopic=133001    [20.1 is where  VCS  lost then 20.2 where they appealed and lost again . But read the whole thread as it may help you in other ways too.
    • Sian Williams from Indonesia takes us through her week during the coronavirus pandemic. View the full article
    • stop doing nolans job for them... there are numerous threads here in the same forum yours is in     no DN info to follow   dx    
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Problem with a race bike I sold

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2829 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I sold a non road use racing motorcycle in a private sale back in October of last year. It was a bike that I had only ridden on 4 brief occasions having bought it myself privately a year earlier.


I resold the bike using the full description I was given from the guy who I purchased it from. In my ownership I rode the bike on track on just four occasions and had the bike Dyno tested in my ownership where it made the power the guy I purchased it from claimed. The guy I bought it from had claimed that the engine had been refreshed not long prior to my purchase but could not produce receipts for this work so I took a punt on buying the bike as he seemed genuine and was well known in race circles as a genuine guy.


I had no reason to believe that the bike had any issues at all. I know a good bike from bad and this one rode well and the engine was very strong on power. I was forced to sell it for financial reasons but sold it on with great confidence and genuinely thought the buyer got a fantastic bargain given the further £500 I reduced the asking price to get it sold to a good home. It was sold for more that £1000 less than I paid for it and I only used it 4 trackdays, plus I paid out £500 for further parts and testing. I was so confident in it being sound I sold it to a mate, genuinely feeling I was doing him a favour.


I'm now deeply embarrassed as the bike blew its engine on just its second day on track with its new owner. He has had the engine stripped by a specialist who feels from the condition of the engine that it has not had the recent refresh work done as claimed. I pointed out in the sale that I was told that this work had been done but I couldn't produce receipts but in my brief use of the bike and the testing I had done I saw absolutely no reason to doubt it.


I really don't know for sure if the bike has been run low on oil, overheated or over revved. These highly strung bikes have oil changes after every use so it may have been run with the wrong level, they have no cooling fans so have to be kept moving or may have overheating damage and are very easy to over rev when down shifting on track. If the specialist feels the bike has not been refreshed as claimed its hard to contest that without receipts to prove the work and its something that can only really be seen with the engine in bits.


The buyer has not asked anything of me yet but if they do I would like to be sure of my rights should he get a huge bill and expect me to do something. I'm worried he may want to reject the bike which I cannot afford to buy back or expect me to pay for the repair which may amount to a huge sum of money which again I don't have.


It was a private sale, done for cash with no receipt advertised through an internet forum. Even worse the buyer is a good friend. I'm unsure yet if he is prepared to take it on the chin as it was a private sale on a highly strung race bike. We have all bought and sold a few and you take your chances. I've just passed on the description I had which I had no reason to doubt.


I'm hoping its either going to be taken on the chin or if he does feel I owe something legally I don't have any liability and am here looking to confirm that this is the case. I just hope any goodwill gesture I can afford to make will be taken as being fair and better than nothing. I really don't think I'm going to get anywhere going back to the guy who sold it to me either, like me he is not a trader either, just a private individual. The last refresh was done by a mate of his so he may well of believed himself it had been done correctly.


Gutted what should have been a sweet deal turned into a mess and I hope it doesn't mess up a friendship. I hate people feeling like I have wronged someone when I genuinely thought the bike was a good one. I want to make it right but have to protect myself and just don't have the cash to do anything but make a small gesture to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have been absolutely straight in your advertising and, if I read your post correctly, you even pointed out that the rebuild had been done before you bought the bike and you had no direct evidence, then, I believe the purchaser has no legal recourse.


His only likely legal claim would have been for mis-advertising which you do not appear to have done. I think, as you suggest, this is a highly tuned bit of kit, and therefore a failure is always possible when racing.


You said you had raced it a few times and saw no problem. Maybe the the new buyer rides just a bit faster and harder than you do! :car:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking the time to reply. I certainly passed on every bit of information I had and the work was done before I bought the bike so I could only go on the guy I bought it froms word and pointed out I had no way of proving it. If the work had not been done or there were any faults I was certainly unaware.


I don't think I legally have to do anything. This is more of a deal to me as its my reputation, made worse by the fact its someone in my circle of friends that involved. I kinda have a feeling of responsibility even though its not my fault.


I've yet to be asked for anything and I don't even know if I will yet. I just want to be in a position that should I be asked that its understood that legally I am not obligated to do anything and if I offer up the little bit of money I can afford to help with the repair it is taken in good faith as me doing the best I can to make right as I could have just walked away. This could amount to nothing and we sort it out amicably as friends but I don't know if or which way the buyer will jump yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bike completed its first outing with the new owner at the controls, any issue with the engine would have manifested itself then, and as you confirm the oil is changed between circuits, there would have been an opportunity to check any filings and bits when the sump was drained.


Is it a two or four stroke ? Any other things that might lead to a quicker than normal demise ? (Kawasaki gearboxes spring to mind)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bike is being used on a four day event, shared by a few different riders. I supplied it with some spare oil and filters so expect this was changed before the event as the bike had stood for some months over winter with the oil in it when sold. That oil was clean but I would have changed it again prior to such a 4 day event. I'm pretty sure the buyer would have too as he is pretty knowledgeable and understands this type of machine. I got a message at the end of day one that the bike was awesome. The bike then failed some time on day two after one of the riders reported a rattle and found it low on oil. They put more oil in and later it let go. Not sure how much track time it had done between those riders nor if the oil starvation was due to it being underfilled or a fault causing it to burn. I just got a report that it failed on day two, a mechanic who I know has very specialist knowledge had pulled it apart, worryingly found gunk in the oil and didn't feel the condition of the inlet ports showed the bike had been refreshed very recently. The bike is a 4 stroke supersport spec machine. I've yet to get more details of the extent of the damage or cost to put right.


Issue is that its a bike that's probably a £20k build 6 years ago and given the level of tuning has the bills to go with that. I sold it for just £4k given its age but a supersport spec engine rebuild could be a big percentage of the bikes overall value. It's already in the hands of a very respected specialist who understandably is going to charge a fair wedge to do a top draw job to put his name to any repair as he is only going to do it to the finest standard, using brand new parts. In the bike racing world reputation is important so a £4k bike is still going to be treated to the same high standard as a brand new race bike by such a mechanic.


The other people involved with riding and working on the bike are friends of mine so I don't want to get into accusations as to someone mistreating the bike etc. Likewise I have never taken any part of the bikes engine apart so only have the previous owners word that most resent refresh done prior to my ownership and that the motor is sound. My few outings on the bike and dyno testing showed it to be sound too. If the mechanic has found any issue I don't want to get into any argument over it as I genuinely have no previous idea of any issues at all.


Time will tell if I'm expected to do anything or not, still waiting to hear. We may not have any dispute as like me the buyer may understand its one of those things totally beyond my control and I have also been burned. I hope he doesn't want anything then I can offer a small token amount toward the fix, which I can afford which can be seen as me being fair doing something I didn't have to rather than me trying to pay him off on the cheap.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I got a message at the end of day one that the bike was awesome. The bike then failed some time on day two after one of the riders reported a rattle and found it low on oil. They put more oil in and later it let go. Not sure how much track time it had done between those riders nor if the oil starvation was due to it being underfilled or a fault causing it to burn.


As per the last post, the bike was fine throughout day one. Nothing could therefore be attributed to earlier use, or ownership.

The fact you were advised the bike was 'awesome' (keep the text, just in case) after the first race, and it was only during day two that low oil was discovered, before engine failure confirms something catastrophic happened on that day to cause the damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...