Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

discrimination at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4102 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

My husband as worked for a company for 14 years with no problems, good attendance and so on.

 

2 years ago because of cut backs they made the job more demanding without doing a risk assesment, so basically my husband had an injury nothing was done about it, so put in for a industrial injury claim that is nearly being settled.

 

He has seen work doctors who said he can carry on in his own department as long as he has suffience breaks and so so. Well again they are doing cut backs they have gone from shifts to days which they are allowed to do.

 

Then all of a sudden his manager was having problems trying to cut back on the setters, there is only 3 of them, my husband being 1 of them, he was trying to come up with a plan, which was not in there contract, when my husband approached on this, his manager reply was well we will have to get rid of 1.

 

Then the next day my husband received a letter stating that he is being moved to another department because he was only just aware that he had put a claim in for industrial injury, yeah cause it was! I t was the duty care of the company to do this.

 

So now he has lost his shift allowance and his setters rate and the job he is now doing is even harder than the 1 before, and he is still having problem with his injury which occured 2 years ago.

 

He has now but a grievance letter into hr saying he is being discrinimated against and wants to be put back into his old job, he has evidence through his solictor that they knew about this problem over a year ago, so why now, are they allowed to do this, my husband will take this all the way if possible, any comments would be grateful, thankyou

Edited by honeybee13
Spacing.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Covered by the Equalities Act. It seems that your husband is being treated differently because of his disability and this is unlawful. The letter virtually proves the point on its own but there are a lot of hoops to jump through before any claim is successful. Speak to the Equalities Commissioner's office help line and get the forms for a "statutory questionnaire" as a first step. You fill this in and give it to your employer who then is obliged to answer. If they dont it is taken as being detrimantal to any defence they may offer at a later stage. If the employer has any sense they will work out what "necessary adjustments" they need to do to prevent or remove the discriminatory practices. Changing a job to a lower paid one is not an answer taht will impress a judge or Tribunal chairman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's slow down a bit here and do some fact checking...

 

Has your husband had it confirmed that his current condition consititues a disability by a medical professional as far as they can? (Ultimately only a judge can decide but doctors offer a decent opinion.)

 

Has his workplace agreed that the adjustments he requires are reasonable, preferabley in writing?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband put his grievance letter in, and the main boss wanted to speak to him. His reply was he should never have been moved and that he will move him back into his department, he said it was hr that have done this as they are doing risk assesments in his department due to the ongoing work claim, and he couldnt see why he wasnt allowed to be there. Anyway he is off for a week, and asked my husband if it was alright to stay put until he got back from holiday and he would then sort it out, so my husband is being calm and awaiting monday for his return, hopefully everything will be ok, i think its the grievance letter he put in that has made them take action, i will let you no what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lisa I wish you luck. We can't really offer advice unless you answer the questions. But crossing fingers for you.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...