Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nephew,s Santander- Mothercare Credit Card PPI Refused.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3965 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been helping my Nephew with His PPi on His Mothercare Card.

 

He honestly didnt know what it was.

 

He even had Menangitis and was very ill and didnt claim.

 

Had problems with DCA but has caught up and nearly paid off .

 

Only realised he had PPI when I looked at his statement and told him.

 

Put in a claim for him and this isthe response.

 

Absolutely terrible was sold the card at a till in the shop.

 

The card was originally issued by GE

 

Can you advise next move please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well there are immediately at least two things you can challenge them on.

 

They admit that they have no way of knowing what went on in the store. If they don't and you do then that is in your favour. I bet the assistant just pointed and said "sign here and here". So they are speculating on what might have happened.

 

The second thing is this business about the 30 day cancellation period. That is nonsense.

 

Have a look at these points from the FSA handbook....

 

 

3.3.3 G The firm should recognise that oral evidence may be sufficient evidence and not

dismiss evidence from the complainant solely because it is not supported by

documentary proof. The firm should take account of a complainant’s limited

ability fully to articulate his complaint or to explain his actions or decisions

made at the time of the sale.

 

3.3.5 G The firm should not reject a complainant’s account of events solely on the basis

that the complainant signed documentation relevant to the purchase of the policy.

 

3.3.6 G The firm should not reject a complaint because the complainant failed to exercise

the right to cancel the policy.

 

 

Have a read of Appendix 1 of the handbook which is in the PPI forum stickies

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and i would think the assistant made a nice commission out of button-holing

you on the checkout or 'seling booth' on the way out.

 

p's

 

just heard a rumour the Lloyds who use this 'speculation' type rejection of PPI reclaimers

have been told to knock-it on the head.

and stop speculating that they can get out of reclaims by a speculating letter.

 

news on the forum soon.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Letter received today very short .

 

This matter has previously been in full and we issued our final response on 18th January 2013.

 

Our position remains unchanged.

 

Should you require anty further information

 

please contact me etc etc etc.

 

What next ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we see the org letter you sent please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Santander & Halifax are really hard to crack I'm working on a couple at the moment . Really wanted to get this sorted as my nephew isreally going through a hard time divorce etc but looks like Ombudsman case. Yet it was sold in store. I have written another letter but not sent yet think I'm clutching at straws they are just playing for time

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to me this is a clear case of the sales person making a buck under commission

 

he was told where to sign, he was told it was compulsory.

 

what ever else happened or didn't is immaterial.

 

that blunt reply from them stinks of a brush off

 

try that lloyds letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx I will looks good to me.

 

Can we take this to FOS it was taken out in 2001

 

I also believe it was originally a GE Account taken over by Santander

 

so how can they know what processes were in place all very confusing .

 

I'll post my letter up when I have completed it and maybeyou can tweak it for me I'm not the greaest letter writer more an accounts person

Link to post
Share on other sites

the FOS have NOT said they would routinely reject complaints outside of any timescale.

 

infact i think they'd side with you in this case.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Letter from genworth.

I write futher to your correspondence realating to PPI . I am sorry for the inconvenience that you have experienced to date.

Some time ago we advised you that we were awaiting direction for cases such as yours from FOS

In order to dteremine potential redress which may be due to you, Genworth will now write to the seller of the policy to obtain details on th policy, including details of premiums you have paid. It is anticipated that this process should take approximately 2 weeks

 

Once we have details required to assess your complaint further we will be in touch with you.

 

Not sure how to look at this could be promising at least its not a NO

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Genworth pay does it mean they pay the compound interest or just the 8% I have been looking at other threads and it looks like they just pay the premiums plus 8 % is this right

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri

no if its a credit card under FOS guidelines

it is compounded int

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

where are you figures?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the card still running?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's ok

 

you need to write back simply saying that

they have seemed to have forgotten that

the account was a credit card

 

so the 8% stat int does not apply.

 

the interest should be at the card rate and compounded

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...