Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First Plus PPI Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, All, after some advice please on PPI, this is a tricky one.

 

Originally took a loan out with First Plus via a broker called DialaLoan in 2002 with all the PPI etc added.

 

In 2005 to pay off some more debts, I then cleared the loan by taking out a new loan direct with First Plus, the new loan obviously had PPI added again.

 

In 2007, the worst possible scenario happened,

 

My partner lost her main job and we fell behind on mortgage payments and First Plus loan payments as we couldn't afford to pay both,

We Eventually lost the house as it was reposseed by the main lender.

 

From the Sale of the house, the first mortgage was paid off and the remaining equity of £40K was obviously given to First Plus against my outstanding loan amount of £80K.

 

There is a shortfall of £40K owing on the account which they have never chased me for in the past 5 years.

 

Myself and my partner are in a better position now and want to start paying this amount off,

however we would like advice on how to do a PPI reclaim to help reduce the amount we owe.

 

Would they entertain a claim beings we owe them money still ??

 

What are our first steps ??

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ims21 - Thanks for the reply:-

 

Initial thoughts are the PPI was sold with pressure, the loan being front loaded, only covering for 5 years but now realising it was added to the full 20 year term, hence 20 years of interest !

No questions on existing illnesses or existing life insurance i had etc

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok the problem you may have is that if you start rattling their cage about the PPI they will almost certainly start to get aggressive on this shortfall.

 

The PPI refund is unlikely to cover it all.

 

I'm going to ask some others what they think.

 

Do you know why you haven't been chased for the shortfall? Do they know where you are for example?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wonder if the rollover of PPI would inflate it lots as we are talking several £1k's of PPI here - twice.

 

i know you are saying that they have never chased you

but i'm also wondering if any more was owed?

 

you would have got quite a sum off when you paid the 40k

 

no statements or anything after the pay off?

 

have you p'haps looked at a cra file to see if its there?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ims / dx - Thanks for the input

 

No idea why they havent chased me,

 

about two months after the house got repossessed, they traced me to my new rented accommodation,

 

I received one letter of a debt company saying that i owed First Plus £43K and that I had 14 days to pay it,

obviously i wasn't in a position to pay it, so ignored the letter,

 

one more letter sent about a month later asking to make an arrangement, nothing ever received since.

 

I stayed in that property for another four years and moved last year,

no more letters ever received, If they want to trace me im sure they can as my new address is on my CRF.

 

As for my CRF.

the loan is still showing in there as in default (being updated monthly) ,

strange thing is,

it says i still owe £80K even though i know £40K from the house sale was paid of it,

this figure has not been updated since i was living in the original property,

 

I would love to get this info corrected, but they then might start chasing for an unreasonable repayment plan if i make contact ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...