Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement- 21/06/19   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]- 12/07/19   3 Date received 15/07/19   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? N I can't see it   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes a ANPR Camera showing arrival and exit but separate parking machine in car park not at gates    6 Have you appealed? Y Post up your appeal] I am waiting for a copy of my appeal but I have other emails sent i can send  Have you had a response? Y. Email was never sent as they stated on 29th July. Finally got the notice of regection sent by email on 3rd Oct.    7 Who is the parking company? National Car Parks Limited owned by Park24.co   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] NCP, Terrace Road, Bournemouth    For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Not on the letter but found on line its BPA   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, BPA please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   in either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONL
    • Not much point in appealing. You paid for 4 hours and stayed for an extra 45 minutes. Goes to show what a bunch of crooks you are dealing with when you first appealed they delayed their response until you came liable for the higher charge and they wouldn't reduce that sum. From now on just ignore everything you get from NCP  and their unregulated debt collectors (birds of a feather). They will try to frighten you with increased costs  that you can safely ignore. In the  meantime please complete the questions asked by dx above and post up any PCNs so we can see if they got them right. Also we need to see their signs in the car park especially the one at the entrance; any that are different from the others and the T and Cs on the ticket machine. Before posting the PCNs please delete your name and reg. number plus anything else that might identify yourself.  
    • Don't forget ... the attorney general (Cox) who apparently advised 'misleading the Queen, Parliament and the British people as ' sounds good to me .. actually said they could ..   He doesn’t much like the idea of staying in the European customs union But said he would be willing to accept one if it would secure the goal of getting Britain out of the EU.    BUT He followed with “If we decided (meaningless distracting time suggestion) that we wanted to review our membership of any such customs union if we signed it – and I'm not saying we will – that's a matter for negotiation and discussion,”
    • Thanks dx   I have emailed the business and I have requested a refund on the form provided by them.   I have noticed on Saga.co.uk there is an article referring to the same website and a paragraph from another motorist who also received PCN for same journey at around same time as us.  'At the end of November 2018 I was travelling on the M 25 over the Dartford Bridge and returning the next day. So I went online the night before and thought I had paid for a return journey at a cost of £12. My Tesco MasterCard shows a payment of £12 to “DartfordCrossingCharge Bristol 000“. I have now had to pay £70 fine plus the correct charge of £5 because the official site did not get my money. There must be so many people being tricked by this false website , sowhy can it not be taken down? The Dart Crossing company isn’t interested. Perhaps because they are also making money from the [problem] every time someone like me makes a mistake?'
    • Hopefully a ditch will be a place of pilgrimage and historic national importance in the UK shortly ...   Off out with a shovel to pick a good spot and dig a trench by the side of the road about half way back from the local watering holes as an offering   ... Pick a good spot where I might get caught short on the way back every Friday night
  • Our picks

san_d

Old people should 'hurry up and die'

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2453 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Finance Minister Taro Aso said Monday the elderly should be allowed to “hurry up and die” instead of costing the government money for life-prolonging medical care.

 

http://www.japantoday.com/category/politics/view/aso-says-elderly-should-be-allowed-to-hurry-up-and-die

 

Aso, who also doubles as deputy prime minister, said during a meeting of the National Council on Social Security Reforms: “Heaven forbid if you are forced to live on when you want to die. You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all being paid for by the government.
The gentleman above is no spring chicken himself, he's 72. Should he give the good example himself?

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

72, yes he should then set an example himself. sayonara :) but, no chance. he's in power so will be ok. not like 'his 'people' that should die when they can no longer contribute their well earned income that pays for his luxury living.

we complain about mp's expenses, accountability, etc, justifiably. but just look at some countries. n korea, and some african countries, for eg, the 'rulers' live a life of luxury yet 'their' 'people' suffer horrendous poverty etc. similar situ in other asian, and african, countries. if africa united for eg, and got rid of the outside influences, terrorists, etc, and corrupt/power hungry individuals, they could be such a wealthy & powerful continent. no wonder there are still outside influences! thatchers son excluded :)

Edited by Ford

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the Liverpool Pathway used in this country so terminally ill patients can die with "Dignity". Watching my mother die on this caring course was beyond words. If it wasn't for the fact my sister is a nurse herself, and made certain that my mother was kept hydrated, it would have been even worse than it was. At least this bloke spoke out load what some of our caring leaders are thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..... At least this bloke spoke out load what some of our caring leaders are thinking.

 

seems as if he was more concerned with gov't costs then the right to die. '“...... You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all being paid for by the government."

Edited by Ford

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How old he define the elderly? Retired? over 60?

In East Glasgow it's over 30.


"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
seems as if he was more concerned with gov't costs then the right to die. '“...... You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all being paid for by the government."

 

Oh I see. Pay into the system for 40 odd years, which you'd hope would support you in your old age. And this is how they repay you...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you have miss-read this, he isn't talking killing them off, just not forcing them to take drugs that keep them alive when they want to pass on.

 

“I don’t need that kind of care. I will die quickly,” he said adding he had left written instructions that his life is not artificially prolonged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does seem a bit ambiguous. on one hand he's suggesting that he and others should not have to be laid up with tubes etc. but, on the other saying that his people should be worried about the gov't costs for someone being ill when 'old'. some people recover from being in 'tubes'. and should have every right to live, as to die, despite any 'costs'. depends on the circumstances. maybe just a bad choice of words?

Edited by Ford

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's clear what he says: he doesn't want the state to pay for treatments that can prolong old people's lives.

 

I personally don't believe in overmedicalization but some categories of old people need constant care and supply of medicines. If you cut this supply what basically happens is that they die.


"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...