Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AMEX - monthly charge on my credit card


mab177
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all,

1st time user on this site, so hopefully someone can give me some advice!

 

As title says, i have had this charge taken from my blue amex credit card for a long time, well since i took on the credit card and not really understanding what its for,

Its called AMERICAN EXPRESS INSURANCE SERVICES, it appears on my monthly statements from july 2007 costing £16.00 a month.

Then in may 2010 the cost went to £16.80 a month up until present.

 

I know some of you would say why have you left it this long to find and so on but i wasn't really 1 for studying my statements often , i just open them up and went straight into binder. hence im only now starting to proceed with ppi on other cards lol.

 

anyway basically i'd like to know if this is amex's version of payment protection insurance, or if anyone has any info or dealt with this on their credit cards and maybe what actions to take like CCA Them and SAR Them also.

 

Any help greatly appreciated. MB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a lot for PPI. You really need to ask Amex first as they do have schemes for house and car insurance too which can be charged to the card.

 

Would these also be a case of being mis sold . I clearly don't remember accepting nor applying for anything like this.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would these also be a case of being mis sold . I clearly don't remember accepting nor applying for anything like this.

 

Thanks

That's hard to say until you talk to Amex. How did you apply for the card? If it was online then a missed tick box might have inadvertently opted you in to a scheme.

 

But only Amex can actually tell you what they're charging you for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi.

just and update about this charge on my amex card.

 

phoned amex this morn , they say its a life insurance policy and thru a company called Cigna. I am now waiting on a return call from Cigna to explain everything about this as amex told they cant tell me muh more about it.

Edited by mab177
Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

Received the call back from a chap at Cigna Insurance services, the Information he gave me was it was a marketing call and it was a verbal agreement made over the telephone and then the policy Doc's were sent out to in the post.

 

I asked if there were a recording of the telephone call , his answer was No there wont be one. I asked if there was a any sort of agreement Documents i have Signed to accept the policy , answer No as it was a verbal agreement.

 

He then went on to mention that the policy payments are usually collected by DD but i chose to pay it through the amex card.(Coincidence Amex and Cigna work together)

 

finally he said , that i need to write to them to enquire further on this info i asked during the phone call.

 

 

what do you expert people suggest on this , is it worth pursuing , could there possibly be a claim,

any suggestions to letter i should send, and so on.

 

I Would appreciate any help and comments , Thanks, MAB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you're looking to achieve. Are you saying you have absolutely no recollection of this and would not have signed up to such an agreement?

 

You could SAR the insurance co. if you think they're not being straight with you but there seems to be no evidence so far. If it's not a PPI contract then you've got to build a thorough case as there is little momentum on non-PPI matters.

 

Amex and Cigna working together is pretty much irrelevant unless you can identify something underhand that has been going on, otherwise its just direct marketing at work. They all do it unless you tick the box to opt out.

 

If you don't want the policy then it may be possible to surrender or sell it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, what i'am possibly trying to achieve is whether this could be a mis selling of this product, yes i do believe i have no knowledge of signing or verbally agreeing to this product. , though as CIGNA stated in my phone call to them recently that this was done verbally over the phone. On another point , when i first took the amex credit card the account was dormant for a good few months as i never used it so was at £0 balance and then out of the blue the charge for this mentioned insurance service was being deducted monthly.

 

chap from Cigna quoted they have no records of the phone call agreement , no signed agreement.!!

 

sorry if im not making sense, aint very good dealing with this sort of stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, first things first, you need to give Cigna the opportunity to provide all the info so write to them and SAR them if the info seems dodgy. You need a copy of any pertinent policy documents too.

 

I doubt Amex will consider any chargebacks or other disputes if it's been running this long.

 

After 5 and a half years paying for what could turn out to be a quite legitimate policy I doubt you'll have grounds for any kind of "mis-selling" but there might be other ways. But you need the info first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...