Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help !!!!! / I have been served a statutory demand


nirandudu1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been served a statutory demand by (bw legal) a debt recovery firm acting on behalf of barclay card.

 

I owe barclay card the amount of 7,411.29 from credit card debt since 2008.

 

They have written and called me severally, but i've ignored all contacts and correspondence.

 

A letter was slotted through my letter box(no envelope,no stamp) on the 7/1/2013 threatening to file for statutory demand,on saturday the 12/01/2013,

 

a letter along with a statutory demand was hand delivered to my address

 

,then again another statutory demand letter was posted to me yesterday monday 21/01/2013 telling me that i have till the 2nd of february 2013.

 

I have never disputed the debt nor have i been CCJ over it.

 

Is it possible to have the SD set aside in my case,

 

can i do it myself or do i need to go to a solicitor?

 

Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello and Welcome,

 

I've moved this thread to our Legal Issues Forum, hopefully you'll get some advice shortly.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there no dispute with the debt?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The options you have are to

 

a) Dispute the debt

 

Typical reasons are non enforceable CCA but you would have had to send a CCA request before the SD was received for it to be most effective. Amount - can be disputed due to unlawful fees being added or PPI

 

b) Compound the debt - come to an agreement with a repayment plan but it must be affordable and should not prejudice any other creditors. If you make a reasonable offer that you can substantiate and BW Legal refuse to accept it, you can apply for it to be set aside on the basis of refusal to accept a reasonable offer.

 

c) Secure the debt - offer something as security usually a charging order on any property you own.

 

You have nothing to lose by trying to set aside. It doesn't cost anything. You will need to submit form 6.19 which you can find here - http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/Abo...land-and-wales

 

Suggest you send a CCA request to BW Legal and a SAR request to Barclays to get as much information as you can.

 

Sorry got to go to work now but I'm sure someone else will be along to help shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd get as much info as possible as quickly as possible.

 

sar to BC now by RD

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

didn't say it stopped them

 

but you need the info.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk,but what if they do not respond before the 2nd of february,can/will they still be able to commence bankcruptcy?

 

 

A Subject AccessRequest (“SAR”) will take up to 40 days for response from your creditor.

As you state thatyou do not dispute the debt, you ought to make contact with your creditor andmake your offer to pay the debt off at a rate per month that is within yourmeans.

Request that he(your creditor) withdraws his Statutory Demand (“SD”) and enter discussion withyou with a view to negotiate a repayment plan with you.

Is there any PPI onthe agreement?

If you cannot reachany agreement as to paying a monthly amount that you can afford, or if you donot respond to the SD, the creditor will continue his action against you andproceed to bankrupt you.

You really need toact on this matter and make a decision as to how you are going to deal with it,because if you ignore the matter, it will not go away and only worsen for you.

I hope theforegoing is helpful to you.

Kind regards

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk and the mould, i can't remember if there's PPI on the account,but chances are there is.So if they refuse my offer(50 pounds per month)hey can still pursue for bankruptcy? That means they'll probably delibrately refuse my repayment offer.

 

Whatwere your normal monthly payments under the agreement before you stopped orbecame unable to meet the same? This is relevantas to your proposal to offer £50 per month.

How manymonths’ payments have you missed and what is the reason as to why? Again, this is relevant as to your saidproposal to offer £50

Has yourcreditor served a valid statutory default notice upon you? Has he terminated the agreement via statutoryprovisions of the CCA 1974 as amended or has he terminated under the terms ofthe agreement on the grounds of your non-performance of your obligation(s)under the same?

Kind regards

TheMould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response guys. The mould,i stopped paying when i lost my job in 2008(4 years ago),prior to that,i think i was paying 70 pounds(not 100% sure now as its been a while),I don't know if a statutory default was ever served neither do i think they've officially terminated the agreement by the processes you mentioned. Can i dispute based on these???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response guys. The mould,i stopped paying when i lost my job in 2008(4 years ago),prior to that,i think i was paying 70 pounds(not 100% sure now as its been a while),I don't know if a statutory default was ever served neither do i think they've officially terminated the agreement by the processes you mentioned. Can i dispute based on these???

 

Can Ijust remind you that you have previously stated;

“I have been serveda statutory demand by (bw legal) a debt recovery firm acting on behalf ofbarclay card. I owe barclay card theamount of 7,411.29 from credit card debt since 2008.They have writtenand called me severally, but i'veignored all contacts and correspondence”. (emphasis added)

And;

“I have not madecontact with them and there's nodispute with the debt.should i call them or write to them?” (emphasis added)

You have not posted sufficient details and evidence to supportany view, opinion or advice as to helping you to dispute the debt with a viewto apply to set aside the SD. If it isnow your intention to contest this SD, then you must review all paperwork for thisaccount and post back with sufficient details of the history and any evidencethat you believe will support a set aside application.

I would advise based upon the material you have posted here thusfar, that you contact theClaimant/creditor and put a reasonable offer to him and request that hewithdraws his SD.

Come back and update, if you make an offer that is, post the Claimant/creditor’s response to youroffer, in the alternative, post details of this matter and evidence inorder to establish whether or not we can advise you to contest the SD.

Kind regards

The Mould

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the late response guys,i was down due to flu yesterday,slightly ok now though.Many thanks the mould, i think i'll just come to an agreement with them to pay off the debt with an acceptable monthly payment plan,what do you guys think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

First things first you need to spend some time reading around these fourms, especially in here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes but just type in Lowells in the search box and you will find plenty of threads.

 

A CCA request is the first step, and also a SAR, send the CCA request to Lowells (they are probably the owners of the debt now), the SAR goes to the original creditor. You can find the links in my signature.

Make sure you send £1 postal order for the CCA request (send recorded) and £10 for the SAR (again send recorded delivery) You will need to sign the letter for the SAR but NOT for the CCA request.

 

You have got 18 days from when the demand arrived in your hands in which to apply to set aside at your local court. however not all county courts handle bankruptices/insolvencies, you can check here to see if your local court handles BR's / Insolvencies - http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/hmcts

 

You will need forms 6.4 (set aside) and 6.5 (witness statement) which you can find here - http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/about-us/forms/england-and-wales

It doesn't cost anything to set aside a demand.....

 

If you want to fight this and avoid being made bankrupt and are prepared to face up to these bullies then you will certainly be more empowered after reading these forums....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...