Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi again,

 

After my Newlyn semi-victory (They cancelled most of their fees after many emails... See my previous threads) I am arguing with Collect Services for a PCN of £172 for which they are asking £558. I have contested these fees and asked for a full breakdown of them. They have sent a document including 3 LEVY/VISIT

The situation is:

After a letter by post

-1 they left a letter with important fees I couldn't pay at that time. I said I woudlnt pay the fees.

-2 Second letter even worse. I called immidiately to know what it was, they said to write to explain why I couln't pay, which I did.

-1 month or 2 later a new letter, I call saying I was still waiting for answer Thay said to wait.

-New letter, then I called again and realised that their email was wrong. Resent all the emails.

-Finaly they sent the breakdown of the fees which is as follow :

 

(months dates are not precise in my head...) But this what they pretend

 

Date

05/03/2012

05/03/2012

07/03/2012

22/03/2012

22/03/2012

24/04/2012

21/09/2012

Type

Costs 7.00

Debt 165.00

Letter fee 13.44

Visit / Levy Fee1 62.40

Attendance to Remove 149.50

Visit / Levy Fee 2 78.00

Visit / Levy Fee 3 82.80

Amount

 

 

 

TotalBalance: £ 558.14

 

I need to specify that they never attended to remove or even to levy. They just come knock once and go away straight away. Once, I opened the door and he was gone already. I called immidiately on his moblie and told him he was gone when I opened the door (I was still naive about bailiffs), he laughed and only said that I had to pay. He didn't come back or anything. They are just adding up Fees and lying.

Anyway, in their 2 last emails, they said that they never levied indeed and the charges where for VIsit/ Levy and here is their email:

Further to your email the fees applied to the account are described as Visit/Levy Fees on the statement not levy fees as you have stated.

 

The fees are applied under paragraph 3 of the regulations

 

3. For attending to levy distress but where the levy is not made, the reasonable costs and charges for attending to levy.

The costs and charges are not to exceed the fees and charges which would have been due under paragraph 2 above if the distress had been levied.

The costs and charges are subject to taxation under rule 11.

Note: The aggregate costs and charges payable under paragraphs 2 and 3 are not to exceed the costs and charges allowed for three attendances to levy distress.

 

You have been provided with a breakdown of the fees with our email dated 7/11/12 and have already confirmed that this has been received by you. The balance due remains as it was on that statement £558.14.

 

Whilst you have contacted us regarding payment you advised that you would not be paying the full amount due. Enforcement proceedings will continue until the full balance due has been received.

 

We would advise that the Warrant of execution authorises us to remove goods belonging to you if the penalty charge notice and bailiff fees are not settled in full. Please see attached copy.

 

Proceedings have not been withheld.

Regards

 

---------------------

 

Ined I tried to pay the PCN in full on 2 occasions (impossible to do it to the issuer as they redirect automatically to the bailiff)

I refused to pay when the bailiff said he wouldn't stop the action.

 

How can I answer to this please. Thanks a lot!

Maybe I could send them the official costs copy???

 

Thank you for advice!

 

Best

Link to post
Share on other sites

So this warrant is still valid for 1 month and a half and they will harass me until then.

Has any a legal letter I can reply with regarding the fees.

 

They came again today,

 

Thank you!

Edited by StopB
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dear all,

 

To follow up with this story, I kept arguing withem via email. They sent some "Regulation articles" to intimidate me stating that I had to pay the fees. I sent back The Regulation Articles stating what Fees should be paid according to what had been done. And since there was no Levy, I only owed them £13. I also sent Ombudsman reports with exemples of Bailiff outpassing their rights.

They said they knew the report and I still had to pay but they would accept £400 instead of500 something... As I said, the PCN is only £172.

I didn't reply. And after the 12 of march, the limit of the Warrant, they sent a letter stating that if I didn't pay within 72 hours the full amount (back to £558) they would insitgate a Court order "to obtain information to ascertain incomeand assets; attachement to earnings; third party debt order; removal of vehicle.

 

The question is can a court give authorisation to them to take money directly from my account?

 

Shall I start a formal complaint to the council, or call the Colelct Services to try to pay the PCN only and see what happens.

I am tired of this but I prefer to spend time arguing than giving my money to these thieves.

 

Thank you for any advice that can help.

 

Xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...