Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi,   My friend was being bullied by a manager who kept saying that anonymous people were complaining about her, she is asian and the minority where she works, she raised concerns in her meeting that she felt it had something to do with her race and gets treated differently to the rest of her colleagues due to off the cuff comments previously made and was told by her manager that as a minority she has to prove herself more as a minority in life and thats unfortunately the way it is. Following on from this they’re were more anonymous complaints all revolving around her attitude when speaking to the anonymous individual(s), she then had a meeting with hr initiated by her managwe and expressed her concerns, no outcome was given as the hr person said it was informal and a week later she has been told that she is being made redundant, my question is there were no specific incidents mentioned and my friend is still confused exactly how this came about but suspects it’s her manager who has taken a disliking to her, is this lawful?
    • Thanks for advice . I have spoken to the ICO , and their opinion is that there “may “ be cause for complaint . In the first instance I should write to the hospital (CEO)citing GDPR, giving them 30 days to respond . If the response is not to my satisfaction , then back to the ICO to raise a formal complaint . The ICO also suggested copying in the GMC with the complaint , I feel at present that is one step too far , perhaps I will sit on that until I get a reply from the hospital.
    • Thanks ethel and stu007   Yes, we had the kerb double dropped so me and my partner can park off the road. Before , just had one, and idiot would park in middle of properties so couldn't fit two cars on road outside. Has been issued a good 3 or 4 PCNs for obstructing since done. Its the back of the car, sometimes as far as a wheel but has a long boot/bumper which hangs over, so its not fully over. Recently seems to be as far as can without getting a ticket.   CCTV - shall read up thanks. Oh also, when I say 5 CCTV, that is 4 on property (100% out of boundary) and 1 in car which is lit up all night.   Does this count as harassment? The initial start of this thread, about 6 threatening letters asking me to pay for vehicle damage or court (nothing came of this) The constant parking annoyance (going on a couple of years) The loud music, witnessed by Env heath officer but not quite loud enough for notice, so letters sent. Paint 'accidentally' spilled on road outside my property (because was parked over our drive at time) Letters about rubbish outside my own garage at rear of properties and the 4 screws attaching bamboo to his fence. Then reported me for fly tipping, didnt go anywhere as officer agreed wasn't causing an issue. I have since sorted the screws and bamboo and idiots fence is literally falling apart. Concreting over 1/4 of my grass in rear lane whilst doing own part. Stupid things like having a BBQ and the parasol sticking way over the fence into my garden. All very subtle and annoying things to cause issues, without quite breaking the law.   The council are aware and claim powerless as own properties and the police pretty much are not interested.   What can be done?    Cheers   E!              
    • Hi, any thoughts on this would be greatful, will send tomorrow i think.. letter_15th_oct.pdf
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2458 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts



I'm aware that if a landlord has failed to protect a deposit, or failed to provide details, they are liable for certain penalties.


Our situation is that:

-our deposit is registered as being protected with mydeposits starting August 2010

-since August 2010 the tenancy has been renewed several times

-some tenants have been replaced at various times with other tenants since Aug 2010

-when the tenancy was renewed, and some tenants replaced, new tenants were simply told to pay their deposits to outgoing tenants, who signed a letter saying this had been done

-we received no updated paperwork from mydeposits (with updated names) when tenants were replaced

-we are now about to all move out and end the tenancy (31 Jan)


The names on the mydeposits paperwork we have are:

-A, listed as lead tenant, who moved out over a year ago

-B, who moved out over a year ago

-C, myself, still resident and about to leave

-D, still resident and about to leave

-E, who moved out over a year ago

-F, who moved out over a year ago


The letting agents are well aware that some of the tenants have changed; we have not kept it secret from them and each time a renewal contract was signed it had the correct names on.


My question: do any of the penalties that would apply if the deposit were unprotected apply in this situation?


(Obviously we wouldn't just take them to court for the sake of it, but we would be interested in it as a bargaining chip to use if necessary to protect ourselves from spurious deposit deductions).


Thanks very much for any help/advice!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The coorect procedure is when you move out you have to claim YOUR deposit from the scheme.

So if it is protected in your name, no problem; this will trigger any claim from the LL re deductions, and if you agrre you will get deposit back, if there is a dispute over deductions then they should still return any amount not in dispute. you can use the ADS dispute resolution yo sort out claim or you can take LL to court.

I am assuming this is a house which is shared? i.e.joint tenancy! however the deposit can only be protected in one persons name ( lead tenant ).

The deposit can only be returned when the tenancy ends, for all of you. A new agreement has to be signed for those wishing to stay.

To take LL to court for non-protection can be expensive though the fast track county court. any compensation is decided by judge.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on whether you have actually signed a new tenancy agreement. It sounds like outgoing tenants may just have signed what is known as a deed of assignment, which basically says that the tenants have changed.


However, your landlord or letting agent should inform us of any changes to the names of tenants registered at the address and when it comes to the return of the deposit we can only deal with the lead tenant, who seems to have since moved on.


We will need to update the tenancy information so please contact a my|deposits adviser on 0844 980 0290 to discuss the matter.


We also have guidance on our website about deposits for joint and several tenancy agreements, which may also be useful. Unfortunately I cannot post links yet so please visit mydeposits.co.uk and visit the tenant's guide section.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

thaks my deposits for clarification.

I dont think LL or agents realise that any changes must be registered with yourselves and up dated.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help so far.


There may be a slight misunderstanding - the wrong names being on the deposit is not too much of a problem for us, because we are still in touch with the lead tenant and they would still be able to represent us if necessary.


What I am trying to determine is whether this irregularity can be used to prevent the landlord from making spurious deductions - ie whether it creates a legal context in which the landlord is forced to give us our full deposits back. This would be the case, for instance, if the deposit had not been protected.


Some extra information:

-In August 2007, August 2008, August 2009 and August 2010 we signed yearly ASTs. Each time it was drawn up as a new contract. Some names changed each time but also some continuity.

-Each time we were charged a fee to "re-protect" our deposit but I don't remember whether or not we were given any paperwork to prove that our deposit was protected.

-In August 2011 we signed a 6 month AST.

-In February 2012 we signed an "extension agreement" to the 6 month AST. We had already informed the letting agents that 2 tenants (including A) were being replaced. However, the agreement they sent us still had the old names on. We amended it to the correct names, signed it, and returned it, drawing their attention to the amended names. Once again they charged a fee to "reprotect" the deposit.



-Mydeposits website has our deposit listed as "being paid" in August 2010, and in the name of "A", a tenant who was replaced when the extension agreement was signed.

-The only paperwork I can find in our records folder is an undated declaration with the names A/B/C/D/E/F, signing to say that A can represent us in decisions regarding the deposit, and listing mydeposits contact details. I suspect it dates from either Aug 2010 or Aug 2009. Hence my assumption that the deposit is being held in those names.


Hope this helps to clarify things; if anyone knows the answer to my specific question that would be really helpful! Thanks.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it would help you, if LL updates the records held with DPS.

Any claim for non-protection or notification would be protracted anyway through the courts and would require a lot of up front costs from yourselves, so unless you are willing to actually go this route it would be counter productive.

Best to rely on the scheme to decide on any spurious claims from thje LL and you always have the option to take LL to court for deposit anyway thriugh SCC which is a lot easier.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...