Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

been suspended for fraud and theft


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Tell the truth. Only the truth leave theories and opinions out f the room. Good luck!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Emmzzi has it spot on. Nothing more can be said.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just tell the truth, answer whatever they ask clearly and fully. One thing i have to advise is do NOT start rambling or going off on a tangent unless it confirms what you have already been saying. They will take this as you are making excuses or fabricating a story.

 

Stick to emmzzi's good advice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attended this today its regarding a drink for 2.90 I was phyiscally threatened one night in work raised a grievence which has not been upheld after being threatened I walked out of work it had past my finishing time. This drink I had served and put onto till system obviously to find out amount to charge this sale was not finalised or cashed off before I left the building.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might also be worth submitting a grievance on the grounds that you believe the impartiality of any proceedings might be adversely affected by the previous events and the involvement of the manager concerned.

 

Tried this with a pre written statement was told if you get up and leave I will contact hr and stop paying you as you have to answer these questions.

 

Also many points or things I stated were not written down although I have recorded it on mobile

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand post 30. Can you try again with more detail please?

 

When you get the notes of the discussion be sure and add in the parts that have been missed!

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I reveal I have recorded it

 

Not a good idea - fundamental breach of trust is not the way to go. Just refer to what was said at this stage and query any missing bits in the notes as appropriate. Of course should they deny any missing pieces then that may open the way for you to indicate that they are 'mistaken' as you will be able to quote word for word what was said.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 months my partner blew whistle on the place and ever since ive had all this 2 disciplinaeies he dismissed me this was immediatly overturned by hr and now this disciplinary also a grievence which has not been upheld. Its all this one blokes doing hes come into business as new manager I have never worked a shift with him. Its obvious he wants me out but im going to fight this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait Is this manager that is disciplining you the manager you have had issues with? If so, you can request to HR/Senior management that you feel that he is not a fit person to conduct the interviews due to your background with him.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait Is this manager that is disciplining you the manager you have had issues with? If so, you can request to HR/Senior management that you feel that he is not a fit person to conduct the interviews due to your background with him.

 

I.attemped this yesterday with him and he threatened to stop my suspension pay as I stated I had no comment to make and questioned his impatiability he accused me of delaying proceeding and refusing to copperate all on tape x x

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. DOnt talk to that manager, go as high as you can and tell them why he is unfit to conduct the interview. It is nothing to do with him. You have the legal right to ask for another manager to conduct it. Especially if this manager is being abusive and has a personal vendetta against you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That my point. You NEED to go as high as you can and ask for a reinvestigation, as you have reasont o believe this evidence hs been fabricated by a manager who has a vendetta against you. If your company is even remotely decent, they will assign another manager to check over the entire evidence.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where would I sent this that request was refused yestetday. He is the pub manager dont know anyone higher. Shall I hold off and see if I get invited to disciplinsry baring in mind that yesterday was investigation meeting as he didnt proceed with last investigation

Link to post
Share on other sites

If hes the manager, go to the regional manager, or even head office.

 

Just remember, the longer you leave it, the more chance you have at him sacking you. If you notify senior management before hand of everything that has gone on, then you have some comeback.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had to speak to hr policy team due to non payment told them of my concerns and how ive been suspended for last month now the third investigation and they told me and I quote we only need reasonable belief that you were stealing and our policy is dismissal how much higher can I go.

 

Its all a joke, have already done the basics

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I get invited to a discipliary for fraud and theft initailly I am requesting an extension of time as company policy is I can request a postponement of 5 days to prepare defence in this time if I said about his vandetta and impartiabillity would they have to restart investigation with new investigating manager

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wouldnt restart it but if you have evidence to support the accusation, they are obliged to bring in another manager, who will meet both you and the manager who is accusing you, and they will go over the evidence independently.

 

When i was a union rep for the largest meat processor in the UK a couple of years ago, we had 2 managers who were very vindictive against a bulgarian worker. The worker was a fantastic worker, always commended by his supervisors and other staff, the managers however chose to pick apart his work. We ended up escalating it through 3 tiers of management before it actually got independently reviewed.

 

After a 6 month battle, the 2 managers got dismissed for various reasons, and last time i heard (3 months ago) the bulgarian worker is now a full supervisor working to become a line manager.

 

This just shows that a lot of the time, its how you deal with things to get results. The last thing you want to do is be vindictive back as it defeats the purpose of you getting higher help in the first place.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

But the bottom line is my partner dealt with the higher people he blew the whistle on food saftey and the company got penalized resulting in new management since then my partner has left the business and now the new manager is trying to get me out as he sees me as a threat (my opinion) yes I got hr to get me reinstated after he emails me dismissing me but since then they have been no help I told them today im not happy with the investigation and I quoted the responce above how much higher can I go

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you dont get anywhere with senior management, including escalating it to head office, i suggest you see if theres a union you can join ( which ideally should have been joined a while ago). They will strip everything down and put it side by side by the law.

 

It would be far better using a union rep with access to professional employment solicitors and access to independant sources, than trying to deal with this by yourself. Especially when it seems the management dont care.

 

If you choose not to join a union and get representation, and management dont want to listen, then sadly, you may have to look for employment elsewhere. To bring an unfair dismissal claim, iirc you now have to be employed for 12 months.

 

You seem to have a good case as the manager is clearly harassing you because of your relationship towards your partner who used to have a job there.

 

Also, i re-read your posts. You claim head office brought in new management, this would seem that they know there was an underlying issue and thoughtthey removed it. Perhaps if you take it as high as you can and explain what is happening, they will see it your way. Whatever you do, you need to cover your bases.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...