Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ & Interest


Bubbl3
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not sure if Im asking in right place I apologise if I'm in wrong area.

 

I have a question regarding a ccj & interest

 

under notes for defendant it says "if judgement is for £5k or more or is in respect of a debt which attracts contractual or statury interest for late payment the claimant may be entitled to further interest"

 

Does that mean any judgement over £5k the claimant can add extra interest on top of judgement total?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if there is a clause in the original contract that states contractual interest will be applied in the event of a default or judgement - words to that effect. It would not form part of the judgement but would be 'invoiced' (sorry!) separately. Statutory interest can be requested when the claim is made it is 8% - which is applied to the amount of the debt and then calculated at a daily rate. The request will then be made to apply that daily rate to the claim from when it is made until judgement is awarded. Claiming statutory interest does not mean that it will be granted but the claim would need to be defended otherwise it will be 'rubber stamped' interest and all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a copy of the original agreement I've just sent sar so hopefully will have it soon and will see what it says. It was for a £3k loan from welcome back in 2007.

 

The copy of the judgement i have says "you must pay claimant £7,468.32 for debt (and interest to date of judgement)"

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I didn't defend as no longer lived at the address so didnt know about it, first I knew of the ccj was over a year later when money was missing from my wages and found out I had an attachment of earnings.

 

when I called court to find out what it was for I was told it was for welcome debt I did say I knew nothing about the ccj as had moved but was told that meant nothing as it was my responsibility to inform welcome of new address.

 

As I knew I did owe them I did nothing further at that point as didnt know what else to do and paid £2531 via attachment of earnings.

 

I was then made redundant and started working self employed so made no further payments.

 

Was at court with a friend a few weeks ago and while there decided to get copy of the ccj as I had never seen it.

 

Judgement date July 2008, for £7788 inc costs.

Attachment of earnings payments June 2009 - may 2010

Court told me they reapplied for attachment of earnings aug 2010 but marked as unemployed as previous employer told them I no longer worked there.

 

I have lived at my current address since June 2008 and have never had anything from welcome or court. Court have my correct address since my phone call June 2009.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't remember if there was PPI but I'm sure there will be plenty charges. Again I'm hoping the sar will give me this info

 

I have a copy of my credit file from noddle and looking at the balance history, the balance at time of judgement July 09 shows £4863 but a year after judgement balance has gone up to £8689 so looks like they have added

More interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

edit :) see now, when there was first shortfall, you enquired and found out about ccj re enforcement via attachment

4k in a year! sounds like contractual interest?

you need to try and get this interest stopped/reduced asap.

is there any more to the judgment?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

To the defendant

You have not replied to the claim form.

It is therefore ordered that you must pay claimant £7,468.32 for debt (and interest to date of judgment) and £320 for costs.

You must pay the claimant the total of £7,788.32 forthwith

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, seems then any interest post is re contractual interest. as duff says, this usually accrues in a separate pot to be paid once the judgment sum has been paid. and then would need to be claimed on separately by the claimant.

could consider applying for a set aside as say didn't get the claim form, but that could be a long shot. if you do apply on that also request that in the meantime any enforcement action and interest cease. eg http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=12_how_to_set_aside_a_judgment_in_the_county_court

if it is contractual interest then they would/may need to comply with certain regulations re that eg info/notices etc depending on when the judgment was. also, could consider trying to stop/reduce the interest eg via a time order. eg http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=18_interest_charges_on_a_consumer_credit_judgment

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a read of the link about interest and looks like it will come down to what does it says in original agreement will wait and see what it says once they respond to sar and will report back.

 

Thank you for your help so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may find that the original credit agreement is now superceded by the CCJ - ie the CCJ now represents the contract. As the CCJ is dated 2008 you are going to be hard pushed to start setting it aside - too many moons have passed.

 

Now this contractual interest business - your CCJ states you must pay 7788.32 - that was the total amount of your debt no matter if it originally comprised charges, statutory interest, you didn't dispute the amount so they were awarded it. However the contractual interest is something else, have they sent you statements? The SAR request should show this - lets hope they have not. If this is the case then they have shot their bolt, they are required to send you statements very regularly (cannot recall the prescribed details). If they have not sent one they cannot send one that includes all the backdated interest.

 

I have a suspicion that you are being used as a cashcow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have heard nothing from welcome since early 2008 before we moved and have had nothing from them or the court at all at our current address which we moved to June 2008.

 

I'm not looking to get the ccj set aside, I just want to find out what really is owed. As assumed they hadn't chased us as wasnt much left to pay, but I wasn't aware of the ccj being 7k until I saw a copy of it a couple weeks ago I assumed it was around 3k.

 

As there is a ccj can I not reclaim any PPI and charges now is it too late?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as mentioned in the nat debtline link, the s130a cc act requirements re PJCI notices apply re judgments on/after 1/10/08. noticed bubbl's is 7/08!. so, s130a wouldn't apply. but, think they should still provide statements/info etc? also, re fairness. that link provides a useful sum of post j contract interest issues.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...