Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone; I'd like some advice regarding a council tax debt that is being pursued by Rossendales.

 

 

I moved to England to live with my girlfriend as she was studying down there, lasted all of about 7 months.

 

This was about February of 2012. (edit.) I moved out of our flat in February and back to Glasgow where I've been since.

 

A month or so ago I had a letter from Rossendales hit my door step saying I have a debt to the council!

I spoke to the council and Rossendales informing them I had no court summons or any information about the alleged debt.

 

I was told that they only have to send the summons to the last known address (even though it was Lincoln city council who tracked me down over a year later!) I asked if they could track me down AFTER the court case, what stopped them doing it before? No answer, repeated themselves saying they were only obliged to send to old address (not much use to me).

 

I'm a student, unemployed and living off of approx £50 a week (less than JSA).

 

I was wondering if a English court order could be actioned in Scotland?

What upse

The total amount is a little over £160.

 

I've asked Rossendales to allow me to set up a plan of £3 a week, they declined so I told them I wouldn't deal with them and I'd pay to the council the £3 a week via their online payment, spoke to council who wouldn't do anything because "the debt is with Rossendales now" BS.

A little of something is better than a lot of nothing, right?

 

I also live in a shared house with some family, there is a car parked on the grass of our small front garden, it's broken down. This car is owned by a family member and doesn't belong to me!

It has outstanding finance on it, regards to proving beyond all reasonable doubt, does the bailiff have to call DVLA to find ownership?

 

Oh, they've sent me a letter today saying it has been assigned to an "enforcement officer".

What upsets me more is that they try to make this cowboy bailiff sound high and mighty.

If we want to do that; I am known as an education enforcement officer.

 

Anyway, any advice you have would be great.

 

Thanks.

Edited by will4298
add information.
Link to post
Share on other sites

will flag your thread for site team.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.inksters.com/enforcingenglishdebtinscotland.aspx

Sorry I can't answer the enforcement in scotland question but this might help.

 

The DVLA can tell them if a Mr. Bloggs is the registered keeper of a vehicle reg no ABC 123 ... All the DVLA can give is a yes/no answer to that question.... but they cannot tell them the actual name they hold as the registered keeper of that vehicle Easiest route to save a lot of hassle is for the third party owner to make a claim to ownership and provide the proof to back it up to Rottendales.

 

Write to the Council and tell them their agent is refusing to accept payments that can be seen affordable to you in your present circumstances and tell them you will be making those payments direct to them at £3.00 payable every Monday to satisfy the debt to them., make sure you do not default with the weekly payments and you will find there is little to nothing the Council can do thereafter.

 

WD

Edited by wonkeydonkey
Link to post
Share on other sites

The DVLA can tell them if a Mr. Bloggs is the registered keeper of a vehicle reg no ABC 123 ... All the DVLA can give is a yes/no answer to that question.... but they cannot tell them the actual name they hold as the registered keeper of that vehicle Easiest route to save a lot of hassle is for the third party owner to make a claim to ownership and provide the proof to back it up to Rottendales.

 

WD

 

Thanks for the reply; will look it up now!

 

As for the DVLA side of things, surely if the bailiff asks the DVLA if it belongs to me (gives them my names) and they say no that would be enough evidence to prove I wasn't the registered keeper of the car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply; will look it up now!

 

As for the DVLA side of things, surely if the bailiff asks the DVLA if it belongs to me (gives them my names) and they say no that would be enough evidence to prove I wasn't the registered keeper of the car?

 

You would be right to think that...sadly Rottendales just do not know how to think logically, from what we read here on cag it would appear most of their bailiffs are uneducated to even the basics of enforcement, when things go wrong and they are in a tight corner of exposure their boss Mrs Green Jones just labels each of them as a 'single bad apple' ...even she 'can't do the maths' ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would be right to think that...sadly Rottendales just do not know how to think logically, from what we read here on cag it would appear most of their bailiffs are uneducated to even the basics of enforcement, when things go wrong and they are in a tight corner of exposure their boss Mrs Green Jones just labels each of them as a 'single bad apple' ...even she 'can't do the maths' ???

 

Thanks for the advice; as for the weekly payments I have no intention to stop paying and even less intention than that to pay a dime to Rossendales.

They can spend as much money as they want chasing me; I'm paying the debt.

 

To a certain degree, I'd like a bailiff to show up on my doorstep; I've heard lots about them and I'd love to see them try and intimidate me and/or my cousin.

I'll record all encounters with my camera (just so they have no way to back down from an inevitable mistake) and I'll print out the automated receipts I get from counci's online payment service, not that Rossendales care I'm paying it to the council but it's worth showing for proof to the camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Bailiffs cannot visit you in Scotland, they would have to apply to the court to get the court summons changed into a summary judegment then they can instruct sheriff officers to collect it.

I would not call them again and make sure you keep everything in wiriting.

I'd also go along with wonkeydonkey's advice regarding paying the Council direct.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Bailiffs cannot visit you in Scotland, they would have to apply to the court to get the court summons changed into a summary judegment then they can instruct sheriff officers to collect it.

I would not call them again and make sure you keep everything in wiriting.

I'd also go along with wonkeydonkey's advice regarding paying the Council direct.

 

Thanks a lot.

 

And I'm guessing by what others have said about Rossendales that they haven't taken the initiative and got the summary judgement?

Also, is there much difference in a summary judgement and court summons?

 

The hearing has taken place apparently (even though it was "heard" at a bulk court centre) so technically NO ONE gets a hearing, they're just judgements issued.

As for my first encounter with their bailiffs, do I ask for a copy of the warrant and a copy of the sheriffs court's summary judgement too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for my first encounter with their bailiffs, do I ask for a copy of the warrant and a copy of the sheriffs court's summary judgement too?

 

I would very much doubt you'll have any visit from a bailiff, they will have to apply to your Local Sheriff Court before taking any further action.

 

I'm not sure what procedure the Sheriff Officers would have to go through as the 'case' has already been decided in England.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would very much doubt you'll have any visit from a bailiff, they will have to apply to your Local Sheriff Court before taking any further action.

 

I'm not sure what procedure the Sheriff Officers would have to go through as the 'case' has already been decided in England.

I don't trust Rossendales to know the law or the procedures attaining to it.

 

I havea strong suspicion that they will visit me on the off chance I bend and pay them.

If this is the case, I should ask for the original order along with the sheriffs summary, right?

 

I've read that if a bailiff clamps a car without first levying it or ascertaining if it is owned by the debtor then the legal owner of the car can legally remove the clamp by cutting the chain?

 

Just want to make sure I'm covered before his visit, if he doesn't call a little bit of education won't hurt!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rossendales won't & can't visit you as the Certificate the Bailiff holds is only valid in England or Wales. Maroondevo52 has explained the situation in Scotland, personally I think it will go back to the Council and if you tick along at £3 per week then it would be difficult for the Council to do much more.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to confirm as above

 

Bailiffs can't and won't visit you up here.

 

They would need to apply to the high court to have the LO transferred into a summary warrant up here and then would need to employ sheriff officers to enforce the summary warrant.

 

As you are willing to make payment, I am assuming the monies they are claiming are due and correct?

 

 

And if so then make the payments online direct to the council.

 

IF they were to transfer to the scottish court system - if you have been making payment theres not much a court would do about it.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite surprised that Rossendales didnt know this, or they do and hoped you didnt.

 

As you are on benefits you are potentially vulnerable so it would need to be handed back to the council anyway.

 

Hopefully they will read this and hand it back any way knowing that it may end up costing them more to pursue it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am quite surprised that Rossendales didnt know this, or they do and hoped you didnt.

 

As you are on benefits you are potentially vulnerable so it would need to be handed back to the council anyway.

 

Hopefully they will read this and hand it back any way knowing that it may end up costing them more to pursue it.

 

Thanks for the replies.

 

I kind of hope he turns up; I'd like to ask him if he has any permission to be at my door.

 

I'm not on benefits per se; I was on a full time care order until 2010 and as I'm studying in full time education the local government who issued my care order are obliged to pay my rent and £50ish a week for my general needs.

This isn't technically classed as a state benefit - it's more of an allowance to young people leaving care.

I only started receiving this in October last year.

 

Trying to explain to Rossendales that I simply do not have the money is like breaking teeth.

They can demand all they want but when I simply do not have it, they're going to have a hard time getting it.

 

As for removal of goods; I own very little and if some meat headed, uneducated A-level skipping **** comes to my door and asks for entry he'll get an option of retorts.

If he plays up and starts shouting; I've got nothing to be ashamed of, I'm happy to send him on his way - all on video of course!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if they are stupid enough to go to Scotland to pester you, you could call the police as they will be fraudulently misrepresenting their powers under Scottish law, their certificates being merely toilet paper north of the border. can't see a Glaswegian copper having any truck with their excuses as he feels their collars.

Edited by brassnecked

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

 

As for removal of goods; I own very little and if some meat headed, uneducated A-level skipping **** comes to my door and asks for entry he'll get an option of retorts.

If he plays up and starts shouting; I've got nothing to be ashamed of, I'm happy to send him on his way - all on video of course!

I love your description :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...