Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Penalty Fare, They Took a Care Of Address But I Don't Live in the UK...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I arrived to gatwick yesterday and bought a train ticket in a rush, and instead of grabbing my ticket i picked up someone else's payment confirmation slip (which annoyingly enough looks like a ticket). I made a rush for the platforms and the guard saw me running so he opened the gate to let me through. I got on the train, the inspector came along and found me the wrong bit of oblong paper.

 

I refused to pay but gave a friend's address where the bill could be sent. I don't live in england however and don't feel morally obliged to pay because even though i made a mistake i did actually pay for a ticket.

 

He even forgot to give me a copy of the sheet that i signed.

 

As I don't live in the UK can i get away with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I arrived to gatwick yesterday and bought a train ticket in a rush, and instead of grabbing my ticket i picked up someone else's payment confirmation slip (which annoyingly enough looks like a ticket). I made a rush for the platforms and the guard saw me running so he opened the gate to let me through. I got on the train, the inspector came along and found me the wrong bit of oblong paper.

 

I refused to pay but gave a friend's address where the bill could be sent. I don't live in england however and don't feel morally obliged to pay because even though i made a mistake i did actually pay for a ticket.

 

He even forgot to give me a copy of the sheet that i signed.

 

As I don't live in the UK can i get away with this?

 

You will be convicted in court, and fined in your absence for breach of Railway Byelaw 18(1).

 

As long as you don't come back to the UK, you won't have a problem.

 

If you do return to the UK after an extended period of time, you may find that on your return, an arrest warrant may be have been issued, (for non-payment of fines) and the UKBA may detain you and hand you over to police, where you will be put before the next available court session.

 

Your friend may also find that court appointed bailiffs appear within the next year or so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't help wondering how often that happens. Was a real DoB given (or required)? If not I bet every Jose Garcia and Johan Smitt must get a right grilling each time from the UKBA.

 

Actually have the tories not replaced the UKBA uniform with shorts and a tshirt, as even they know the UKBA are incapable of even catching a cold?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I gave my real details.

 

What if I pick up the letter they will send and write them back from greece, explaining that that is where I live and put forth the argument that the guard at gatwick was at fault for waving me through in my confused state of mind after my long journey.

 

Do they really go to the expense of a court hearing in cases like this against someone non-resident here and with no assets?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I expect there will be help with a possible argument for you once we know what law or byelaw they think you contravened. There's a chance they won't write at all.

 

For what it's worth though, if you want to get the train company on your side, telling them their member of staff is at fault is very unlikely to achieve it. I haven't seen it work yet, I don't think.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Byelaw 18

 

(1) In any area not designated as a compulsory ticket area, no person shall enter any train for the purpose of travelling on the railway unless he has with him a valid ticket entitling him to travel.

 

Byelaw 24

 

(1) Any person who breaches any of these Byelaws commits an offence and [...] may be liable for each such offence to a penalty not exceeding level 3, (£1000), on the standard scale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I gave my real details.

 

What if I pick up the letter they will send and write them back from greece, explaining that that is where I live and put forth the argument that the guard at gatwick was at fault for waving me through in my confused state of mind after my long journey.

 

Do they really go to the expense of a court hearing in cases like this against someone non-resident here and with no assets?

 

It's no ones fault but your own so stop trying to pass the buck, it is unfortunate that you picked up the wrong ticket but is it the railways fault that you did this? no.

Views expressed in this forum by me are my own personal opinion and you take it on face value! I make any comments to the best of my knowledge but you take my advice at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I gave my real details.

 

What if I pick up the letter they will send and write them back from greece, explaining that that is where I live and put forth the argument that the guard at gatwick was at fault for waving me through in my confused state of mind after my long journey.

 

Do they really go to the expense of a court hearing in cases like this against someone non-resident here and with no assets?

 

 

Given the number of extra staff involved in assisting travellers and ticket checking at Gatwick these days and the generally higher levels of security at stations such as this, it would be relatively easy for the company to check what happened there.

 

Yes, they can pursue action in cases such as this if they choose to do so.

 

HB is right, blaming staff for your own failure to check your ticket without any firm evidence to support your claim is very likely to be counter productive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OC, we have two different threads running at the moment, about people who are leaving the country before any communication or possible court case.

 

Would you happen to know what happens if there is an unresolved case outstanding when someone returns to the UK please? It would be useful to know, because this has cropped up before. I hope my question makes sense.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the alleged offender does not reply to a Summons by contacting the Court or prosecutor's office, the prosecutor will normally ask the Court to hear the case in absence and a conviction may well be recorded.

 

This can result in someone returning to the UK to find that they now have a criminal conviction and unpaid fines.

 

The person convicted will then have to convince the Court that they knew nothing about the Summons and will have to make a Statutory Declaration on oath before a Court to that effect.

 

The Court will then set aside the judgment, making the original prosecution null & void, but the prosecutor will be free to issue a fresh Summons without time constraints and the prosecution begins again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

He even forgot to give me a copy of the sheet that i signed.

 

As I don't live in the UK can i get away with this?

If you were reported, there's no requirement to give you any paperwork.

 

Look at this from the RPI's viewpoint, you had no ticket, just a receipt....What's to say you didn't know exactly what you were doing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the alleged offender does not reply to a Summons by contacting the Court or prosecutor's office, the prosecutor will normally ask the Court to hear the case in absence and a conviction may well be recorded.

 

This can result in someone returning to the UK to find that they now have a criminal conviction and unpaid fines.

 

The person convicted will then have to convince the Court that they knew nothing about the Summons and will have to make a Statutory Declaration on oath before a Court to that effect.

 

The Court will then set aside the judgment, making the original prosecution null & void, but the prosecutor will be free to issue a fresh Summons without time constraints and the prosecution begins again.

 

Thank you, that's very clear. :) I think I remember this happening to a forum member in the last year or so.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, that's very clear. :) I think I remember this happening to a forum member in the last year or so.

 

HB

 

Yes, and things certainly didn't seem to work out the way that user had planned as I recall. :)

 

As a matter of interest, we did have a case where exactly this happened. (one of many, Statutory Declarations are relatively common)

 

 

The prosecution was restarted and at Court on the second occasion, the defendant, who had made a Statutory Declaration that he knew nothing about it, was somewhat non-plussed to find that his memory had let him down. Immediately following service of the first Summons the company had received an email from the defendant, but he had forgotten this when making his Stat. Dec.

 

He was fortunate in a sense, the Court convicted on the original charge and fined quite heavily, but the matter could have resulted in a charge of perjury, which could carry a 2 year prison sentence in some cases.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses.

 

I asked a ticket inspector today what happens if when the bill is sent out it's returned to the sender and he said they'd just drop it. Especially as it was a first-time offence.

 

I suspect it depends on the question asked of the ticket inspector .......

 

did you ask "what happens if I get sent a bill", or

"what happens if I get sent a letter asking me to offer my version of events before they decide if they want to send a summons", or

"what happens if they send a summons".

 

I'd tend to believe what OC has said (as they work in Prosecutions, and I've yet to see a response from them that has later been shown to be clearly wrong!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses.

 

I asked a ticket inspector today what happens if when the bill is sent out it's returned to the sender and he said they'd just drop it. Especially as it was a first-time offence.

 

 

All I can say is that it appears that some inspectors may well have no clue as to what happens after their report is sent in to their admin. office.

 

Be that as it may, it is clearly a matter for you

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...