Jump to content


Barclaycard SAR Reply


PenaltiesGalore
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I have received the attached "SAR" reply from Barclaycard and would like some help please?

 

I better give a brief history of the problems.

 

I went through personal and financial difficulties in 2001, I had "unmanageable" debts and basically stopped paying everyone.

 

I had, or rather still have debts with Barclaycard and other organisations who walloped me for charges, left, right and centre.

 

I am still paying these off on a monthly basis to Link and trying to cope on a limited budget.

 

I then found this forum recently and have been intently reading as many threads as possible.

 

I have SAR'd every single financial institution that I had debts with.

 

Back to Barclaycard, I have received the attached response to the SAR request that I sent to them.

 

1) I can view the letter and THREE statements as, the balance shown is "purely" Default charges as their letter implies,

go back six years and try and claim them all, bearing in mind, these were actually in 2001 and not 2007 as their statements imply.

I am not sure if I view this as Barclaycard trying to help me by suggesting I claim these but forget about going back to 2001

as their statements are dated February, March and April 2007, just within the last 6 years!!

 

2) Write back and say I am not happy with their response, as I actually had two Barclaycards with them at various different periods,

the other one being approximately 2003 to 2007, that I was also hit with charges on.

 

Any thoughts or comments please?

Edited by PenaltiesGalore
Link to post
Share on other sites

as a side note what are link fleecing you on ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you sure you've upp'd the right docs?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again Dx,

 

I am paying Link on the original Barclaycard debt I had and defaulted on in 2001. Feel like I have been paying them for a lifetime! Not sure if that answers your question?

 

Upped the right Docs . . . there were 4 pieces of paper in the "SAR bundle" that I received today - that is the all the paperwork I received that I have uploaded - their letter subject title is in response to my request for the SAR and the enclosed statements, nothing else was received. No proper statements, no credit agreement, nothing else.

 

Their letter as you can see does make the right assumption that I want to find out what penalty charges were levied and that is what I presume the balance is implying on the statements?

 

Maybe I am not with it today and not reading your questions properly - sorry if my reply does not answer the questions you are asking . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY are you paying link for a debt so old

 

how the hell did that fleecing bunch spoof you into that?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

I have received the attached "SAR" reply from Barclaycard and would like some help please?

 

I better give a brief history of the problems.

 

I went through personal and financial difficulties in 2001, I had "unmanageable" debts and basically stopped paying everyone.

 

I had, or rather still have debts with Barclaycard and other organisations who walloped me for charges, left, right and centre.

 

I am still paying these off on a monthly basis to Link and trying to cope on a limited budget.

 

I then found this forum recently and have been intently reading as many threads as possible.

 

I have SAR'd every single financial institution that I had debts with.

 

Back to Barclaycard, I have received the attached response to the SAR request that I sent to them.

 

1) I can view the letter and THREE statements as, the balance shown is "purely" Default charges as their letter implies,

go back six years and try and claim them all, bearing in mind, these were actually in 2001 and not 2007 as their statements imply.

I am not sure if I view this as Barclaycard trying to help me by suggesting I claim these but forget about going back to 2001

as their statements are dated February, March and April 2007, just within the last 6 years!!

 

2) Write back and say I am not happy with their response, as I actually had two Barclaycards with them at various different periods,

the other one being approximately 2003 to 2007, that I was also hit with charges on.

 

Any thoughts or comments please?

 

the docs of the att in post one say nothing about default charges?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt that I owed them the money and continue to pay them, I now only owe a few hundred pounds from the thousands. Call me stupid . . . . .

 

The balance in 2007 was never £5,800 odd that they have stated on the statement. I read the statements in conjuction with their letter and took the implication that the balance was all their charges. I see what you mean that the charges are not listed as they have said on their letter. I have just checked the statements to see if they were double sided but they are not . . . . .

 

The account number they have quoted is also not the same account number that I have on some of the statements I have . . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

how many MORE debtshave you like this

that you've never questionedand blindly paid.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my God! I never realised that.

 

I went through a horrendous time in my life and wanted to get it in order, thought paying them was the only way to move forward and

clear my liabilities.

 

I thought trying to reclaim some of the charges, paying people off and starting afresh might help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems lke to me you need to follow the checks you have learned on your threads herewith EVERY DEBT you are paying.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree Dx and will do.

 

As regards the Sar that I have received, should I write and state that I do not believe that they have complied with my request?

 

I have seen on the other threads that BC do have information going back and they have not provided that to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes question that is all they have

 

what you have means nothing i canmake head nor tail of those 2 statement they mean nowt!

 

you want ALL the info they hold on you not what THEY THINK you want

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PG,

 

BC will only supply statements going back 6 years initially. If you know there are penalty charges on older statements, reply to BC saying you require all statements that they hold, whether on their Microfiche or any other system, or you'll take court action to force disclosure of the data to which you're entitled.

 

Read this thread, particularly post #130 onwards - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?50148-Barclaycard-amp-Microfiche-they-are-wrong-OFFICIAL&p=3106958&viewfull=1#post3106958

 

I think you've misinterpreted what BC say in their letter in post #1. They don't give you any info about the amounts and dates of any penalty charges and this is what you need to reclaim them.

 

You should also read the Interest Tutorial about claiming interest in restitution (I suggest you use a nominal rate of 24.9%) - http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/Interest_Tutorial

 

Are you aware if PPI was ever added to the a/c.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Slick,

 

Hope you are well.

 

I will reply asking for the info as you suggest.

 

I have read most of Shelly's threads where you have advised. Those threads and replies and others on this site, have inspired me to go down this route, so, thank you.

 

I will read the threads you suggest.

 

I appreciate your time in replying to this thread.

 

PG

Edited by PenaltiesGalore
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Just a quick catch up on this. I sent the letter off today, signed for and recorded, as suggested.

 

I do have some statements and was looking at them today and have noticed a debit "Barclaycard, Card Protecti" of £16 on a statement dated September 2003.

 

Would anyone have an inkling of what that might be? It only appears on this one statement so far, so it is not PPI ???

 

I do not recall signing up for anything . . . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob something like CPP.

 

try our search top right in the gray bar

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Dx,

 

I have heard about the CPP and had that as well from 2005 to 2011!!! ( I am now feeling that I had MUG written on my forehead before I found this site!).

 

The CPP payments were shown as such, maybe this one was as well but is not shown as such.

 

Thank you again Dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like one of the unnecessary schemes they loved to flog, in case your card was stolen.

 

Total waste of money but not worth bothering about now if it was a one-off for £16.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like one of the unnecessary schemes they loved to flog, in case your card was stolen.

 

Total waste of money but not worth bothering about now if it was a one-off for £16.

 

Hello Slick,

 

When the 'main' card from 1999 was in default, BC offered me another one in 2003, which I took, both accounts had over limit fees and other penalties were levied. The latter was then suspended when they realised about the first one.

 

I might err slip the £16 in somewhere.

 

He who dares . . .

Edited by slick132
fixed quote box
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...