Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard SAR Reply


PenaltiesGalore
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I have received the attached "SAR" reply from Barclaycard and would like some help please?

 

I better give a brief history of the problems.

 

I went through personal and financial difficulties in 2001, I had "unmanageable" debts and basically stopped paying everyone.

 

I had, or rather still have debts with Barclaycard and other organisations who walloped me for charges, left, right and centre.

 

I am still paying these off on a monthly basis to Link and trying to cope on a limited budget.

 

I then found this forum recently and have been intently reading as many threads as possible.

 

I have SAR'd every single financial institution that I had debts with.

 

Back to Barclaycard, I have received the attached response to the SAR request that I sent to them.

 

1) I can view the letter and THREE statements as, the balance shown is "purely" Default charges as their letter implies,

go back six years and try and claim them all, bearing in mind, these were actually in 2001 and not 2007 as their statements imply.

I am not sure if I view this as Barclaycard trying to help me by suggesting I claim these but forget about going back to 2001

as their statements are dated February, March and April 2007, just within the last 6 years!!

 

2) Write back and say I am not happy with their response, as I actually had two Barclaycards with them at various different periods,

the other one being approximately 2003 to 2007, that I was also hit with charges on.

 

Any thoughts or comments please?

Edited by PenaltiesGalore
Link to post
Share on other sites

as a side note what are link fleecing you on ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you sure you've upp'd the right docs?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again Dx,

 

I am paying Link on the original Barclaycard debt I had and defaulted on in 2001. Feel like I have been paying them for a lifetime! Not sure if that answers your question?

 

Upped the right Docs . . . there were 4 pieces of paper in the "SAR bundle" that I received today - that is the all the paperwork I received that I have uploaded - their letter subject title is in response to my request for the SAR and the enclosed statements, nothing else was received. No proper statements, no credit agreement, nothing else.

 

Their letter as you can see does make the right assumption that I want to find out what penalty charges were levied and that is what I presume the balance is implying on the statements?

 

Maybe I am not with it today and not reading your questions properly - sorry if my reply does not answer the questions you are asking . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY are you paying link for a debt so old

 

how the hell did that fleecing bunch spoof you into that?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

I have received the attached "SAR" reply from Barclaycard and would like some help please?

 

I better give a brief history of the problems.

 

I went through personal and financial difficulties in 2001, I had "unmanageable" debts and basically stopped paying everyone.

 

I had, or rather still have debts with Barclaycard and other organisations who walloped me for charges, left, right and centre.

 

I am still paying these off on a monthly basis to Link and trying to cope on a limited budget.

 

I then found this forum recently and have been intently reading as many threads as possible.

 

I have SAR'd every single financial institution that I had debts with.

 

Back to Barclaycard, I have received the attached response to the SAR request that I sent to them.

 

1) I can view the letter and THREE statements as, the balance shown is "purely" Default charges as their letter implies,

go back six years and try and claim them all, bearing in mind, these were actually in 2001 and not 2007 as their statements imply.

I am not sure if I view this as Barclaycard trying to help me by suggesting I claim these but forget about going back to 2001

as their statements are dated February, March and April 2007, just within the last 6 years!!

 

2) Write back and say I am not happy with their response, as I actually had two Barclaycards with them at various different periods,

the other one being approximately 2003 to 2007, that I was also hit with charges on.

 

Any thoughts or comments please?

 

the docs of the att in post one say nothing about default charges?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt that I owed them the money and continue to pay them, I now only owe a few hundred pounds from the thousands. Call me stupid . . . . .

 

The balance in 2007 was never £5,800 odd that they have stated on the statement. I read the statements in conjuction with their letter and took the implication that the balance was all their charges. I see what you mean that the charges are not listed as they have said on their letter. I have just checked the statements to see if they were double sided but they are not . . . . .

 

The account number they have quoted is also not the same account number that I have on some of the statements I have . . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

how many MORE debtshave you like this

that you've never questionedand blindly paid.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my God! I never realised that.

 

I went through a horrendous time in my life and wanted to get it in order, thought paying them was the only way to move forward and

clear my liabilities.

 

I thought trying to reclaim some of the charges, paying people off and starting afresh might help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems lke to me you need to follow the checks you have learned on your threads herewith EVERY DEBT you are paying.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree Dx and will do.

 

As regards the Sar that I have received, should I write and state that I do not believe that they have complied with my request?

 

I have seen on the other threads that BC do have information going back and they have not provided that to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes question that is all they have

 

what you have means nothing i canmake head nor tail of those 2 statement they mean nowt!

 

you want ALL the info they hold on you not what THEY THINK you want

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PG,

 

BC will only supply statements going back 6 years initially. If you know there are penalty charges on older statements, reply to BC saying you require all statements that they hold, whether on their Microfiche or any other system, or you'll take court action to force disclosure of the data to which you're entitled.

 

Read this thread, particularly post #130 onwards - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?50148-Barclaycard-amp-Microfiche-they-are-wrong-OFFICIAL&p=3106958&viewfull=1#post3106958

 

I think you've misinterpreted what BC say in their letter in post #1. They don't give you any info about the amounts and dates of any penalty charges and this is what you need to reclaim them.

 

You should also read the Interest Tutorial about claiming interest in restitution (I suggest you use a nominal rate of 24.9%) - http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/Interest_Tutorial

 

Are you aware if PPI was ever added to the a/c.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Slick,

 

Hope you are well.

 

I will reply asking for the info as you suggest.

 

I have read most of Shelly's threads where you have advised. Those threads and replies and others on this site, have inspired me to go down this route, so, thank you.

 

I will read the threads you suggest.

 

I appreciate your time in replying to this thread.

 

PG

Edited by PenaltiesGalore
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All,

 

Just a quick catch up on this. I sent the letter off today, signed for and recorded, as suggested.

 

I do have some statements and was looking at them today and have noticed a debit "Barclaycard, Card Protecti" of £16 on a statement dated September 2003.

 

Would anyone have an inkling of what that might be? It only appears on this one statement so far, so it is not PPI ???

 

I do not recall signing up for anything . . . . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob something like CPP.

 

try our search top right in the gray bar

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Dx,

 

I have heard about the CPP and had that as well from 2005 to 2011!!! ( I am now feeling that I had MUG written on my forehead before I found this site!).

 

The CPP payments were shown as such, maybe this one was as well but is not shown as such.

 

Thank you again Dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like one of the unnecessary schemes they loved to flog, in case your card was stolen.

 

Total waste of money but not worth bothering about now if it was a one-off for £16.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like one of the unnecessary schemes they loved to flog, in case your card was stolen.

 

Total waste of money but not worth bothering about now if it was a one-off for £16.

 

Hello Slick,

 

When the 'main' card from 1999 was in default, BC offered me another one in 2003, which I took, both accounts had over limit fees and other penalties were levied. The latter was then suspended when they realised about the first one.

 

I might err slip the £16 in somewhere.

 

He who dares . . .

Edited by slick132
fixed quote box
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...