Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pogle v FD - moneyclaim filed!


Pogle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6579 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So pleased I found this place!

 

I've sent off a request today for a list of charges since my account with FD was opened in 1999, (adapted the template from the library). I have most of my statements for that time, but unfortunately, it looks like the periods I don't have filed, are those where I was really struggling and would have racked up the most charges! :roll: (clearly I was burying my head in the sand good and proper at those times lol)

 

Using the spreadsheet from the library and the statements I DO have, I've calculated so far almost £1500 in charges since 2001! (some months I was being charged an overdraft fee of £30, plus an excess overdraft fee of up to £119!)

 

I've got my current account under control now, and haven't had a charge in almost a year, but it took me one hell of a long time to get to that point thanks to their excessive charging, and I am still in debt to the tune of around £7.5k on cards - so a refund of the charges would be most welcome to help pay these off!

 

Just wanted to say thank you to the guys running this site for bringing the case for demanding refunds to the publics attention really!

 

I'll keep this thread updated with how I get on too :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hokay... posted the request for charges/statements by recorded delivery on Friday. Got a letter from FD acknowledging my request on Tuesday (7th Mar) stating that the statements would be sent by courier in the next few days.

 

Then I was rudely awaken this morning by securicor, (although once I tiwgged what they were delivering, I didn't mind so much that it was only 7am :lol:) delivering a two inch thick wodge of statements.

 

Now... where did I put my highlighter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as I suspected, my initial calculation of £1500 was off... I've been through all the statements I received today, twice (just to be sure :lol:) and it comes to £2140 :shock:

 

Even I didn't think it'd be that much lol.

 

Off to draft my letter now :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a standard 'we're sorry to hear you're unhappy, will respond to your complaint within 10 working days, blah blah' letter today.

 

If I've not heard within the 14 days I set them in my request for payment letter, they'll be getting the next one :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

OK, after the 'we're sorry to hear you're unhappy' letter, I had two more (first one as a result of their 'investigation' into my complaint, and the second in response to my letter before action) drawing my attention to the terms of my account, blah blah. Standard letters.

 

I gave them until 10th April, which is this coming Monday, and although they've made it clear that they disagree with my claim, and consider their last letter to be their final say, I intend to give them until then before I file the claim. I am getting my stuff together to fill in the claim form online today, ready to file first thing Monday :D

 

Wish me luck... with interest etc, the claim will be in the region of £2700!

Link to post
Share on other sites

After letters flying back and forth, FD are still claiming that their charges are not unlawful. They had until today to pay up, and they haven't, so I filed the claim online this morning!! :D

 

£2813.55 in total, with interest and costs!

 

Wish me luck!!!

 

my previous thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, Pogle. Ours filed last week. Keep us posted.

If you found this post helpful please click on the scales, top right. Thank you.

 

If you find this site helpful and if you reclaim your charges please donate by clicking the button at the top of the page

 

First Direct 1 - settled

First Direct 2 - settled

RBS 1 - claim made 8/5/6

RBS 2 - claim made 8/5/6

GE Capital - counter claim 6/5/6

Halifax - settled 31/5/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit of a bugger, but nothing to worry about.

 

I've merged the threads btw, please try and use one thread for your claim.

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6579 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...