Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The funds were taken by eBay, rather than Paypal.  I presume Paypal collects the funds from eBay, and so eBay then sting me for the money.   But either way, before this money was taken from my account, my eBay account balance showed as -£85.  Yes, my bank account has been debited by this amount. eBay say that they are completely removed from the chargeback process, because it is carried out by the buyer's financial institution.  So, conveniently, they cannot help, other than by refunding the chargeback fee of £14. 
    • Perfect, thanks for the detailed response. Once question, do you know how long it takes for the breathing space to get applied? Say for example I have payments due in 4 days and I apply today how does that work? Also, sorry for sounding stupid but what do you mean by default once the breathing space is in place? I mean what does "Default" mean.  After the breathing space is over and I wanted more time, what would happen? I can and will afford the payments after a few months but I just need that breather to sort some stuff out, as I have said I have never missed a payment. Sorry for the many replies but after doing a quick search, correct me if i am wrong. If it then does go into default and it goes to a collection agency am I right in saying they will send many letters and they may consider a claim? and I should only response if an official MoneyClaim is made? Also, If it does go into default does this severely affect my credit score? or will this only be in the case if a CCJ is applied.
    • there isn't one yet use the default mentioned already there. that covers all 3 debts as i assume the PAPLOC is for all 3 debts? dx  
    • a chargeback via a paypal account used in an ebay sale doesn't usually result in funds being sucked from your bank account,  just that you attain a paypal negative balance. as you saying the money was taken by paypal from your bank account without you authorising this? or is it directly the buyers name that is shown? regarding the chargeback but either way you bank account HAS been debited? dx  
    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charged with failure to promptly notify the DWP in prescribed manner of change of circumstances


ReallyScared
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4109 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, please bear with me I am new to this forum. I hope I am posting in the correct place. I've been charged with "failure to promptly notify the DWP in the prescribed manner of a change of circumstances which you knew would affect your entitlement to Carer's Allowance, namely that you were earning in excess of theh permitte amount Contrary to section 112(1A) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (SS92042).

 

This Charge letter came to me in early Jan 2013. I had attended an Interview Under Caution in February 2012, after I had received a letter from the DWP to attend. So, almost a year in between.

 

Long story short, in March of 2009 my disabled daughter had surgery that required me to take unpaid Parental Leave to be in hospital with her (3 weeks) and care for her afterward (recovery, pain management, learn to walk again, loads of physio). I applied for Carer's Allowance to help out for the few months with full intention of going back to work, and informing DWP.

 

On my application form, in the back, I explicitly state in my own handwriting that "I do not yet know how long I will need to care for {daughter's name} at home, and I will contact the DWP Carer's Allowance to discontinue when I go back to work, as I have done in the past." [the past referring to an instance in 2007 when I returned to work after receiving CA and informed the DWP by letter wiithout incident].

 

Also, on my letter to DWP I state that "she will be at home under my care for a period of 2-3 months...." and asking for CA to be reinstated.

 

On April 6, 2009 I started a new job (since my old one had asked me if I could extend my Parental Leave because the company was struggling). On that very same day I popped into the post a letter to DWP saying simply that my circumstances had changed and to please discontinue my CA.

 

No reply came from the DWP, and I hadn't expected one since I never got one when I cancelled the first time in 2007. So, I never questioned it and carried on with my life.

 

Then in Jan/Feb 2012 I receive a letter out of the blue from the DWP about possible benefits fraud and the Interview Under Caution.

 

Unbeknownst to me, I had been receiving CA all that time! The Interviewers stared at me in disbelief, saying how could I not realise about the payments. I explained that my husband and I both make a very good wage, when working our full time jobs, and that we don't live or rely on benefits in any way. So the small amout of £50 coming into the bank account was not noticed. Furthermore, we only do online banking. We do not receive monthly statements, nor do we receive notification if a payment is received. The online statements are full of outgoings and someone would have to scroll back many pages to come to an 'incoming' payment. Something which I just simply never did. There was never any need to.

 

Now, when the overpayments allegedly started, I was still caring for my post-op daughter, but had also started a new full time job. It was a full-on period of time for me, constantly on the go. The last thing I was doing was checking the bank account. I didn't need to. My husband and I both receive paper payslips when we get paid, therefore I don't need to check the account. Everything else is 'outgoing' and as we live within our means, there simply wasn't any reason to keep an eye on the statements.

 

2009 was full of teaching my daughter how to walk again, loads of physio, and managing my 3 children and full time job. I am the 'family business manager' for our family, so I am the one applying for things like Carer's Allowance and also doing the banking, etc. in addition to caring for our children. I'm a busy lady but I like it that way!

 

By end of 2009 it was clear my daughters situation was not improving. In early 2010 I was already researching another surgical operation and in the spring of 2010 she was accepted for spinal surgery in America (because the surgery was not offered in UK or Europe at the time). Therefore, 2010 was full of this activity.....and not checking the bank statements.

 

So, basically, (and I really am trying to keep this short) approx. 3 years went by and we were receiving CA without realising it. The Interviewers seem to think it impossible that we would have missed this. Perhaps I confused the CA payments with the higher rate Care component of DLA (disability living allowance) that my daughter had been awarded -- we literally got the letter informing of this that DAY AFTER the same date that DWP is accusing me of beginning to receive overpayment of CA. My hindsight is definitely not 20/20, but if I ever questioned the weekly payments (and I don't know that I did) perhaps I thought it was the DLA??? I'll never know.

 

Anyway, I want to plead Not Guilty as I don't feel I've done anything wrong. BTW, after the IUC I received an Overpayment Letter of £7,900 in May 2012. I repaid this IN FULL a week later. This information has not been acknowledged by the DWP nor was it included in the very large packet of 'evidence' (payslips, transcript of my interview, etc) against me to substatiate the Charge.

 

I'm looking for opinions, advice, etc as I have never broken the law, not even a speeding ticket, and am Really Scared about this. Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's late and you may not elicit much in the way of responses before tomorrow. I can't advise but am sure people will in the not too distant future.

I did read your post with interest. Have to admit I was thinking 'yeah, yeah, yeah, didn't notice for years? Hmmmm'. But, in a funny way, it began to make sense especially with DLA payments which could easily have clouded the issue. You've paid it back in full which, you'd hope, goes some way in saying a) we didn't need it and b) it was an oversight.

Either way, welcome and good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would advise you to contact the Citizens Advice Bureau first thing in the morning and make an appointment to see an adviser. There will be a specialist benefits adviser you are able to see, but anyone initially will do.

The benefits sections are renowned for using sledgehammers to crack the smallest of issues and there are strict laws and policy guidelines on what they can do. The CAB will have this immediately to hand.

This is important, it won't wait until Thursday.

All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a minimum, the DWP would have issued letters to you at the start of 2010 and 2011 advising you of the uprating of the rates of Carers Allowance.

 

Do you remember receiving these letters?

 

Do you recall what you did with them?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one of those cases where I'd suggest seeking the advice of a lawyer experienced in benefit issues. You apparently did inform the DWP of your change of circumstances and state that you no longer wished to claim CA, and repaying the civil overpayment in full surely counts in your favour. Also, fraud requires intent, and the idea of intent may well be negated by the fact of your sending that letter.

 

But still, it would also seem that criminal proceedings have been commenced. Again - seek legal advice. The CAB may be a decent starting point, but if it were me, I'd want a lawyer.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with Antone that an experienced solicitor who specialises in benefits cases would be a more sensible option than CAB.

 

Assuming that case does progress to court, the outcome will be based uponwhether the Magistrate/Judge/Jury believe you.

 

Personally, I find it entirely credible that: -

 

  • you did post letter at time
  • the DWP did not receive letter
  • you did not check bank accounts
  • you did not realise you were receiving payments

I think my only concern would be what happened with uprating letters or other correspondence the DWP might have sent you.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

No I did not receive any letters from the DWP -- updates or anything. I'm really worried about all of this. What are my chances of being found actually innocent? It really feels like a lose/lose situation even though I feel I did everything right.

 

I have contacted two solicitors so far, but they both want money before they will talk about my situation, and they are also extremely difficult to get ahold of -- always busy, etc. and I am at work all day so it's hard to find a time to get on the phone with them.

 

Any information anyone can give me will be really helpful, thanks.

 

ReallyScared

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

No I did not receive any letters from the DWP -- updates or anything. I'm really worried about all of this. What are my chances of being found actually innocent? It really feels like a lose/lose situation even though I feel I did everything right.

 

I have contacted two solicitors so far, but they both want money before they will talk about my situation, and they are also extremely difficult to get ahold of -- always busy, etc. and I am at work all day so it's hard to find a time to get on the phone with them.

 

Any information anyone can give me will be really helpful, thanks.

 

ReallyScared

 

Then find a solicitor who can find the time to talk with you- there's plenty of them out there.

You need urgent help and advice.

Members have advised as they can on here - surely you need to do the rest.

 

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, no I never receied any acknowledgement. But then, when I cancelled CA in 2007 I never heard back then either. The payments just stopped.

 

I've repayed ALL the overpayment in FULL literally a week after receiving the Overpayment Letter. This has not been acknowledged either. And, it does not appear to be part of the 'packet of evidence' they have against me.

 

I have now done some research and found out that "2.2 billion of overpayments were made in 2009-10 as a result of administrative errors by its staff."

 

And that Royal Mail loses 12.4 million letters each year.

 

Yet I am facing a criminal conviction!!!! I can barely get my head around this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed you say DWP haven't acknowledged your payment of +£7k in May 2012...maybe a quick call to them to confirm the payment and requesting a receipt is the first stop? They did cash your cheque I take it? (assuming you paid by cheque of course)

Lillibelle

 

I only know what I know cos I know it,I only give advice,I'm not legally trained nor do I pretend to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I paid by bank transfer, directly to the DWP account and sort numbers that had been provided. My bank statement shows that the funds came out. But yes I agree I should investigate whether or not they are aware. Still, I don't think this will stop any court proceedings against me. It's like being on a runaway train that I can't stop. At the DWP the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I paid by bank transfer, directly to the DWP account and sort numbers that had been provided. My bank statement shows that the funds came out. But yes I agree I should investigate whether or not they are aware. Still, I don't think this will stop any court proceedings against me. It's like being on a runaway train that I can't stop. At the DWP the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing!!

 

I am sure a legal person could sort this for you.

Costly I know but better than all the stress it is causing you.

You could go round and round in circles with them getting nowhere fast.

At the moment it is their word against yours.

 

There does not seem to be any logic to how they work - so what chance of a simple solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see why they are insisting on prosecuting you when you don't owe them anything.I was kinda hoping if you rang them and they concurred (which they have) you paid up in full there would be no case to answer,,shows my naivety huh?

Lillibelle

 

I only know what I know cos I know it,I only give advice,I'm not legally trained nor do I pretend to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I paid by bank transfer, directly to the DWP account and sort numbers that had been provided. My bank statement shows that the funds came out. But yes I agree I should investigate whether or not they are aware. Still, I don't think this will stop any court proceedings against me. It's like being on a runaway train that I can't stop. At the DWP the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing!!

 

When did you notice the funds had come out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I didn't notice, that's the main problem. I was so busy with my daughter's 2009 and 2010 major surgeries that I wasn't checking the bank account. I had no idea -- no sniff of anything until I received an Interview Under Caution letter in early 2012. Then of course I went back and checked my accounts to find out why. And of course only then noticed that the CA payments were there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly,citizenkain....I can't see why they would bother,,,Maybe ring them when you have time to stay on the phone and go as far up the chain as you can,i can't help thinking (hoping) it's a clerical cockup on their part (Heaven Forbid!!) and if you get no joy then grab a solicitor.

Hope this gets sorted for you.xx

Lillibelle

 

I only know what I know cos I know it,I only give advice,I'm not legally trained nor do I pretend to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, I have decided to write a letter to the person who authorised the charge, explaining that he/she had neglected to include in their Fact sheet and Exhibit list any proof that I had paid (in full) the Overpayment within a week of the DWP letter. I am urging them not to prosecute, saying that I will be pleading Not Guilty and that I have proof of administrative failings and source for confusion. I have a meeting with a Solicitor on Monday. Does anybody else have any sound advice for me??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...