Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a 'witness' to it not arriving till the 15th is sadly immaterial too. regardless to the above anyway, the PCN remains valid. 
    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpaid by previous employer- can i be sued?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

okay so my previous employer has overpaid me by what amounts to be around £400. i did not realise this however, i received a letter in the post a few days ago, (although my employment terminated from this company on August 10th 2012). The company did not pay me when i was suppose to get paid and so my pay was backdated into one lump some, so you can imagine why i was not suspicious of the overpayment. The entire some of money has indeed been spent (in good faith), and I simply cannot afford the repayment. The letter demands an immediate repayment of the full some of money. However, I am a student with no money! what should my next course of action be?

 

Someone please help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several things to consider.

 

Yes, you can be sued (in the County Court) to recover the money, but you could also enter a defence of a 'change of position' were that to happen. It might be successful, but that would depend on how likely it was that you couldn't possibly have known that you weren't entitled to the money. If you were earning significant amounts, or were due a bonus for example, then it would be more likely that £400 was an amount that was in line with what you could expect to have received. If though, your normal wage was only £100 and you weren't owed any bonus, or perhaps holiday pay, then might be reasonable for a court to consider that you should have known that you had been paid too much and have taken steps to query whether the payment was correct - the standpoint being that most people would know roughly what they were owed when leaving a job and therefore there can be a reasonable belief of entitlement.

 

If you feel that the employer is serious about taking legal action to recover the amount, and if you don't believe that you can mount a credible defence, then you would be perfectly entitled to try and agree a repayment plan which fits your current circumstances. You should also of course also make sure that what they are claiming is correct, so make sure that you get a proper breakdown of the figures. You could of course try to bluff it before it gets to the stage where they lodge a CC claim by disputing liability on the basis that it was their mistake, that you had a reasonable belief that the money was yours, and have spent it (changed your position) on that basis. This might just put them on notice that you will have a viable defence in court and they might just consider it too much of a risk to take the court route due to the cost of recovery and the possibility of failing in court and risking costs.

 

Your call really - depending on all of the circumstances.

 

Thread moved to the Employment forum

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing you might want to look at is if you were on the right tax code or maybe on the basic rate (BR), in which case you could be due a rebate which could help cover the overpayment.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure that you read up on estoppel.

From what you have said, you don't have anything to worry about

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi YTS,

 

there is good advice on here already.

 

Caro's idea above is really neat (you may be owed a tax rebate anyway, having only worked part of the tax year). indeed, as per Sidewinder, if your ex-employer got their sums wrong once they may have got them wrong again - it can't hurt to ask them for a breakdown of their calculations.

 

I can offer an actual example of a repayment plan: -

 

At my last job one of the manual workers was overpaid by £3k for a week (they paid him 616 hours overtime for working a bank holiday rather than 16 hours). They realised their error some months later, got the (terrified) guy in (he had spent it!) and agreed a repayment plan of £5 a week. The outstanding amount was recovered when the chap took a large redundancy payment about a year later.

 

£400 is a lot to find when you are skint. But the solution can be quite manageable.

 

It might be worth contacting your ex-employer and explaining your present circumstances - you never know they may even write off the debt.

 

Casting my mind back to my (distant) student past - if all else fails there was always mum and nan to run too. Maybe there is a relative or friend that can help you.

 

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Edited by SweetLorraine
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...