Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Then we are agreed that people come here to a job that supports them, not to open door benefits?      
    • This is exactly what it says on the claim, which I believe are vague : Brief details of claim                                                                                                                         Unpaid claims management fees in accordance with the attached invoice   Please can someone check over our defence. Any hep comments greatly appreciated.       The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague   1. it is denied that any amounts are due under any contractual agreement. On receipt of this claim   We requested information pertaining to this claim from the Claimants Solicitors by way of a CPR 31:14 request sent via 1st class recorded post on 7th November 2019.   To date we have not received the requested information.   Therefore with the court’s permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to   a) show and disclose how the Defendant owes the amount in the claim; reference S-1002591 from the FSCS confirming the rejection. Letter from the claimant dated 8th October 2019 confirming the above   b) show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for;   c) provide a copy of the agreement and Terms and Conditions;   d) provide copies of telephone conversation with Michael Cooper 10th July 2019 and 1st November 2019   e) copy of the signed acceptance form for any redress from Eurosail   (a, c, and d, requested in the Pre Action Protocol returned to the claimant solicitor/director on the 25th September 2019)       2. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5 (4) it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.
    • But only if you remortgage with a new creditor and not the original mortgagee
    • CC told me they don't have a copy of the claim because it got sent out and that's it, they do not have a copy on file. And that I was given claim particulars (text) and I don't need the claim form to submit a n244    Correct MCOL do not retain hard copy of the actual N1...just the text particulars of claim/Claim number/Amounts/Claimants details...there is nothing further on the N1 required. . The other 2 people also said I do not need the original claim form to submit n244    I would have to agree...as long as you have the particulars of claim text.....the date ...claim number.....the amounts and the claimants name....should suffice.   Andy
    • A claim, or as the claims company have advised me, a product information request was supposedly submitted to Barclays in May of this year.....to date I have not had any acknowledgement from Barclays and more worryingly when I have rung Barclays PPI helpline who were very helpful, been told they have no record of anything lodged in any format...Should I be concerned that the claims company have not actually submitted anything or is it normal to have no standard letter from the bank?     
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2496 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I have been living in my shared ownership property since July 2008. I have a property where I can only own 80% of the property. I pay rent on the remaining 20% and this rent is based on the unowned %. I can never own 100% so will always be resoponsible for at least 20% rent. That rent always every year goes up by by inflation (RPI) plus .5%.

 

This 80% max ownership was put in the lease due to the local council planning restrictions. However each year the property is dropping in value and I am responsible for 100% repairs.

 

Is anyone else in this position and does anyone who if there is a way of buying the whole thing so I am not liable for the remaining rent, which could in theory become more than renting a private rented property.

OR Even a way of getting out of the lease if the rent becomes too expensive (Even if it means handing it back to them and I loose all that was invested)

 

Every time I try to comunicate with them the atitude I get is "YOU SIGHNED THE LEASE" and that I should have looked ito the finer details with my solicitor and asked more questions.

 

Any information or similar stories from people that have found themselves in a similar situation would be usefull.

 

Also note that I do not think this issue is isolated to Paradgim.

 

Many Thanks

Edited by Aaron Lilley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Very interesting what you have been told as Paradigm website says differently on Shared Ownership: http://www.paradigmhousing.co.uk/customer-zone/homeowners/shared-ownership/

 

Now Please have a good read of these PDFs and remember the advice you were given:

 

In the Paradigm - Shared Ownership PDF look at the section 'Buying more Shares in your Home'.

 

In the Paradigm - Guide to Shared Ownership PDF look at Page 4 and 5.


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

Unfortunately I was told about the 80% maximium share when sold it but it was not made clear to me the full consequences of that (That is proberly down to my solicitor). Things like:

1. They intend to impose the RPI +.5 rent increase every single year regardless of what effect that would have on my rent in relation to the open market. I was lead to beleive that was a MAXIMIUM increase and that comon sense would prevail when deciding new rents each year.

2. If the RPI index is a negative they will still increase rent by .5%

3. There is no way of getting out of the lease (Even if it meant hading the whole thing back to them and me loosing the entire 40% price I paid for my share)

 

I am effectively at their mercy with regard to the bit I can never own as my choices are:

1. Pay the rent

2. Atempt to sell. However whoever buys inherits the agreement including the rent and rent increases. I cant imagine anyone wanting to take on this type of agreement.

3. Go bankrupt

I cant even rent the property out to someone else.

 

I never realised how restricted my choices would be in this situation. However I supose its my own fault for not looking into the finer details before buying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

IMO I can see no harm in writing to them (always get proof of posting) and ask if their is any reasonable possibility that would be able to purchase the final 20% share of your property and the likely costs.

 

Then wait and see what they say.


How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

Unfortunately I have spent the last 6 months fighting this out with them.

 

I have resighned myself to the fact there is nothing I can do about it (I should have been more carefull when purchasing) However it does not stop me from making as many people as posible aware of what can happen so they do not fall into the same trap.

 

Beilive it or not, these schemes are government aproved, There was nothing my local MP could do for me, accept give me the advice to go to a solicitor. There maybie some law that can be utilised in these situations as I am sure I am not the only person with this issue.

 

One day I am sure these leases will be challenged in court.

 

Luckely I am realy pleased with where I live and most of the neighbours in the block which is the important positive thing to hold on to.

Edited by Aaron Lilley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...