Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My car damaged in car park, how far back can I request to see CCTV footage ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4116 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I live in Housing Association property (England, UK) which is covered by 16 CCTV cameras, 4 cameras cover the residents car park.

 

Just before Christmas, I parked my car in car park and whilst away during the Christmas/New Year holidays my car has been damaged, looks as if another vehicle has caused the damage.

 

How far back can I request a copy of the CCTV footage so I can it view myself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best to ask the housing association how long they keep tapes. But I would think they'd want you to be a bit more specific on timeframe too. 4 cameras, 24hours a day, over the christmas period,,,, that'll take a lot of viewing!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, that's why I asked on this forum in the hope that someone who understands the law in regard to data protection, rules in regard to CCTV footage and how far back can I request a copy of the CCTV footage, rather than a reply based on personal opinion and no knowledge of such legislation and rules.

 

Also, how can I be more specific, car had no damaged when parked just before Christmas and on my return a few days ago, I notice the damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, most, if not all CCTV systems are digital and no longer use tapes.

 

Based on my own experience of using such a CCTV system, its possible to program the cameras to only record when movement detected and to remain recording for a few minutes afterwards.

 

And such a feature drastically reduces the amount of footage actually recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, that's why I asked on this forum in the hope that someone who understands the law in regard to data protection,

what's the law on data protection got to do with it? you're questing video of a public access area, not a view straight into your neighbour's bedroom!! Data protection laws apply to personal data, a video of a couple of cars in a car park doesn't qualify as "personal data"

 

rules in regard to CCTV footage and how far back can I request a copy of the CCTV footage,

the housing association can run CCTV or not run it as they see fit, again there would be no "rules" governing how or how long they keep it for. You can ask for any date you think is relevant, whether they have it or not and whether they are willing to show you it, only they could answer that

 

rather than a reply based on personal opinion and no knowledge of such legislation and rules.

thanks for your lack of gratitude on constructive advise. I'll not be wasting my time on this thread after this :razz:

 

Also, how can I be more specific, car had no damaged when parked just before Christmas and on my return a few days ago, I notice the damage.

well that's your main problem isn't it. Even if they keep CCTV for a month. You say they have 16 cams(4 on the car park) presumably running 24 hours a day. How much effort do you think they will be prepared to put into locating that much data for you when they have no legal obligation to do so?

 

No need to answer that last question of course, just use it as food for thought as I will be leaving thread now :yo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

[/b]

 

No need to answer that last question of course, just use it as food for thought as I will be leaving thread now :yo:

 

 

More personal opinion I see.

 

Forgive me for not reading your entire reply Crem, but the moment I read "What's data protection got to do with it? "

I knew it wasn't worth reading anymore, as it appears to be based on personal opinion rather than fact or any actual experience.

 

I need advice from forum members that understand legislation, not their own personal opinion.

 

Crem there is no point replying if you don't know what you're talking about.

 

Apparently, Data Protection has a lot do do with it.

 

 

Crem, thank you for leaving this thread, much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone can point forum member Old Snowy towards my thread, it would be greatly appreciated.

 

Old Snowy has experience and an understanding of what I refer to.

 

I'm unable to message forum members directly as I've only just joined the forum, otherwise I would send a PM to Old Snowy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Also just to clarify about CCTV:

 

* Yes CCTV does come under the Data Protection Act.

* The Housing Association would also have to be Registered as a Data Controller for that CCTV and its Equipment.

* You would need to find out if its the Housing association staff are operating the CCTV or whether the operating and monitoring of the CCTV has been outsourced to an external company.

* Do you know if you as a tenant are paying a 'Service Charge' for the CCTV? (I bet you are and probably dont know it)

 

I do have to agree with green_and_mean that your best option is to report this to the Police as if required they can request to look at the CCTV Footage from the Housing Association and its a lot quicker than you trying to request this.

 

These PDFs on CCTV may be of help:

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stu007,

 

I do pay for CCTV in the service charge, so it is included in the rent.

 

CCTV, although install was outsourced, its operation is by Housing Association staff, not watched live, only recorded.

 

I reported damage to Police as soon as I discovered it, explained when I believed it occurred and that it would have been caught by CCTV camera. Police advised that I must request copy of CCTV footage or view it myself.

 

This is why I need to know what I am actually entitled to request and how far back I can request to see such footage.

 

Once I requested to see CCTV footage, Housing Association quoted legislation and Data Protection Act.

 

Many years ago, when I used a CCTV camera system during my employment, under whatever legislation, I seem to remember that recorded CCTV footage had to be retained for at least 3 months, maybe 6 and that was when it was recorded onto video tape.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Green_and_mean, thank you for your input.

 

However, It is possible to request CCTV footage, either Under the Data Protection Act or the Freedom of Information Act, maybe both.

 

I made a request to the Housing Association for a copy of the CCTV footage, in writting, via email on the day I discovered the damage to my car and after I had spoken to the Police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject accessrequest under the DPA. Give them as much informarion as you can so they can identify what to look for. So, make, model and colour of your car, where it is parked. You should ask them if they require a fee (max £10) for copies of what they have and specify the format you would like it in if given a choice (has to be legible and easily understood so should be a common format). Chances are they wont charge you as you pay a service charge and are their tenants, most councils and HA dont when it directly involves them in this way.

You should point out that this is a SAR under the DPA so they know. They have a limited time to answer and if they dont have the material they are supposed to tell you whay they havent got copies-ie no storage, video only kept for a certain time etc. They cant say that you are not entitled to see it or it is too expensive to sort out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link.

 

I've already made a request for the CCTV footage, not quite word for word as the linked letter template but close enough.

 

I've stated the periods I require the footage to run from and upon till the time I discovered the damage, I've also explained as to why I require the footage and as to what must be visible in the footage.

 

The HA quoted various legislation, being DPA and refused.

 

I'm aware the HA are legally oblige to respond within 40 days of my request and provide the footage I've requested, however, the HA Manager, as per usual, although quoting DPA, their responsibilities and legislation, doesnt seem to be aware of my rights,

 

Ideally, what I need to know, is how far back can I request the footage to run from ?

 

Also, as I've reported the damage to the Police, should they be pursuing this and requesting the CCTV footage ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can request anything that is HELD. If they have it they are obliged to provide it. get in touch with your ward councillor and tell them that your HA is being obstructive. The relationship between the council and the HA will be very close so if your councillor does their job you will soon get the required response. Also contact the Information Commissioner's Office and tell them what response you get from your SAR if it is not satisfactory. The wording of your letter must make it clear that it is a subject access request under the DPA otherwise they can ignore it. Sometimes organisations claim they cant show you whose car it was that bashed yours because that breaches their privacy. If they try that then name them on your insurance claim as the joint guilty party with others unknown to you.

The police can pursue this if they feel like it but as it is on private property they may decide not to. They would have to be convinced that it was criminal damage, ie deliberate to make them stir.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for such a consice reply.

My email to HA includes every detail, time period, why and what etc, however, I failed to use the term "Subject Access Request."

I will make my request again, but this time use the heading "Subject Access Request " and use such a term through out my email to ensure my request is clear.

 

I don't wish to claim on my insurance due to the £500 excess and it will also be recorded as a Non Fault claim being held on file, possibly affecting future premiums.

 

The damaged caused would cost in the region of £250-300 and that's using a second hand bumper.

 

Should the HA refuse to reveal the Registration Number of the vehicle which caused the damage, can I inform the my Insurance just to retrieve the vehicle details without actually making a claim ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant NOT show you the footage and if the reg no is clear then pass the information on to your insurers who will use their database to find out who the registered keeper is. You may very well recognise the vehicle without the reg anyway so you can then report the owner for failing to stop and report an accident. A car park, for some purposes, counts as a public place (not highway) and this is one of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot use an SAR to view footage you are not in! SAR only covers personal information held about you, you cannot just go around asking to view personal information about other people. How does the HA even know there was an accident, you could be wanting the footage to catch your wife having an affair or any other dubious reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently you can request footage in connection to investigate a crime.

However, although the footage I require is of a car park and private property, the car park is also the public access to and from a housing Estate, so rules are slightly different in regards to other members of the public and residents being identified; but it's how each organisation/dept interprets the rules, all very complicated.

I only requested the CCTV footage as it was the natural thing to do in such circumstance, I was also advised to do

so by the Police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cannot use an SAR to view footage you are not in! SAR only covers personal information held about you, you cannot just go around asking to view personal information about other people. How does the HA even know there was an accident, you could be wanting the footage to catch your wife having an affair or any other dubious reason.

That is why I raised the point about the HA possibly claiming that the offending vehicle was covered by privacy and hence needing the perpetrator's permission to show it. As for how does the HA know there was a collision? Well, they have to look at the footage to see which bit is of the OP's car etc. He hasnt asked for every second of recording since the year dot, merely that which is relevant to his request (which he doesnt have to limit). I also think you will find that if they have footage of his vehicle, whether he is in the shots or not, that is personal information if it is identifiably HIS. Bit like councils have to hand over all data on your address if you are the sole occupier. Not for them to say that they think you dont warrant the info because one of the reasons for the DPA is to ensure that bodies do not hold information that is incorrect or out of date and those that think they know what is good for us often hold incorrect data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...