Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Student with excessive bailiff fees from parking fines in his fathers name. HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am a student living at a property rented by my parents in the UK, whilst they live abroad in Turkey and are only back in the Uk a handful of times a a year. About two years when i was living in a shared house, i was driving a car that was registered in my Dads name, I received two parking fines within a short period of time which I believed were unjust and therefore appealed against numerous times (I had paid a ridiculous amount for an annual permit of which all spaces were nearly always occupied, mainly by vehicles with no permit therefore I was forced to park 'illegally''). Over the past couple of years I have moved around a lot whilst letters regarding this matter have been addressed to my father and posted to the there UK address.

 

Long story short, after moving back to my parents property in mid-November there was a hand posted letter from Swift Credit in the letter box demanding nearly £300. With help from my older sister who is a solicitor, we got the bailiff action suspended until the 6th January. Since then I have had a bailiff knock on my door and hand post another letter in which the sum due has risen drastically. Basically my worry is that a) the debt is not in my name but my fathers and b) I am an unemployed student, and have no means of paying these fees. I would happily change the debt into my name if this was a possibly, I do not own anything worth taking and would be happy to fight the matter but my Father obviously has a house full of furniture and belongings! With help from my sister, we have been in contact with the council who issue the original PCN's and offered to pay them in full, the CAB who appear to have less knowledge than I do on the matter, and also Swift credit themselves to try and find out when the matter will go back to court. All to no avail. The fact that the debt is in my fathers name is proving to be a massive obstacle.

 

I completely understand that my ignorance and arogance is to blame for my current situation, and now know that issues like these MUST be delt with immediately and not brushed under the carpet. I have read numerous forums and advice online. A few threads that I have read on this site have given invaluable advice to people in similar situations to mine, I would be so grateful for any help/assistance that could be provided.

 

Also I must add that, my father finding out about this situation and being responsible for my debt of such expense would be the WORST possible outcome.

 

Any facts, figures or evidence can be provided.

 

Regards,

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ordered the suspension and on what grounds? if it was pending a further hearing then Swifts should back off until that takes place.

 

WD

 

Hi WD,

 

My sister rang Swift telling them the house was unoccupied and asked if action could be suspended as my father would not be in the country until after Christmas, this was just to give me time to understand the situation without the fees increasing further.

 

Any advice on what to do next would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you could do is write to the parking services at the council and explain that you were the driver and you are responsible for the PCN's. Explain that your father will not be back into the country until later this year and you would like to pay the PCN at the stage it was issued.

 

Who did you appeal this too?

 

Because the car is not in your name you may have to tell your father, he can then transfer it over to your name as you were the drive at the time.

 

To be honest I cant really see what other options you have. Sorry. :(

 

Others may be able to see a way round this, but owning up to your father seems the obvious thing to do in this situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice seanarmarts, I did actually ring the council a few days ago explaining the situation and stating that I would pay the fines immediately, I was told that the computer system would not accept payment whilst it was in the hands of the baliffs but 'to make sure the bailiffs are behaving correctly', implying the chances are they were not. Swift Credit deal with all Cardiff City councils parking/motoring cases so maybe he was not just speculating. After the conversation I accessed the councils online PCN payment system and realised he was telling the truth. I have also been told there is no possible way to change the name of a debt :/

 

Ploddertom, I have received two hand delivered letters from the bailiff. On the second occasion he knocked the door and I answered never expecting it to be a bailiff as it was 7:30pm, I immediately stepped outside and shut the door behind me, he asked for my father (using his name) and I panicked and told him my father would not be here until next week. I knew that was the wrong thing to say, In hindsight I should of said he was out the country for the foreseeable future in order to deter the bailiff and increase the chance of the case going back to council. I have educated myself a lot in the past week on my rights with regards to bailiffs, I'm fully prepared to question his ID, warrant and film any encounter if necessary. I'm thankful for your reply.

 

An ideal solution would be for the bailiffs to accept my father was out the country long term and for the case to go back to the council where I with the help of my sister can hopefully pay what is necessary and deal with the situation, without the involvement of a cowboy charging ridiculous fees as he sees fit. I've read that a bailiff company has 180 days to pursue a debt, after that it goes back to the creditor, can anybody confim this is true? Or inform me otherwise.

 

All help is much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PCN's like these are valid for 12 months. I asked about the dates on the Warrant as you say some of them are originally more than 2 years old. You could in theory sit it out and wait till it is handed back to the Council, Bailiffs actually only manage to settle approx 20% of all PCN's they are given.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told that the council are legally allowed to chase a debt for 6 years? I think waiting it out might be my only option at this point. With regards to a warrant, do the bailiffs use intimidation and threatening behaviour initially because they do not have a court warrant and it is not easy/time consuming for them to obtain one? If this is the case, I'm sure waiting it out could work, as the first bailiff letter received is dated 24th August 2012.

 

Thanks for your rely.

 

Danny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are getting mixed up with differing debts. You may be thinking of Council Tax or Business Rates with regard to 6 years, if they obtain a Liability Order within 6 years of the debt being due then they never become Statute barred. PCN Warrants only last for a 12 month and are not renewable.

 

If you think you can stand the tactics etc used by some of the Bailiffs that cal then so be it but be warned constant knocking at the door for an hour or so can wear you down. They are also known for asking about you to neighbours and may inadvertently reveal they are Bailiffs.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

PLODDERTON

PCN Warrants only last for a 12 month and are not renewable.

 

Do you mean if a bailliffs warant of execution or high court write are not enforced/unable to enforce, then the councils cannot, use bailliffs to try & get their money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...