Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Universal Credit - Monthly


Gay_guy1986
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4116 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just looking for some of your thought's of what you think of when Universal Credit comes into force, I have heard that people on benefits will get they money monthly instead of fortnight. how is this possible? how can people survive without any money for 5 weeks? :shock:

Link to post
Share on other sites

when does this come into force?

 

How long is a piece of string? If UC actually happens as planned, it will likely be introduced in different areas at different times.

 

And yes, plenty of folks who work have to budget monthly. It will be a change, yes, but it can be done.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I get £129.00 every fortnight from my JSA (I used to get £140.00 but they taking some out of my money as I had a budgeting loan) so how much will I get every month? I heard from other forums that I will get £145 to last me a month, is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's definetly monthly paid not 4 weekly. It's supposed to help people when they move into employment, so it's not such a shock to have money monthly instead of weekly/fortnightly

 

It will come in when uc comes to your area. Unless your in the pathfinder area then no one knows when it will be introduced to other area of the uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I get £129.00 every fortnight from my JSA (I used to get £140.00 but they taking some out of my money as I had a budgeting loan) so how much will I get every month? I heard from other forums that I will get £145 to last me a month, is that correct?

 

£279.50. Divided your fortnightly figure by 2, multiply by 52 and divided by 12.

 

Your hb will also be included, and any tax credits you get as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the government will end up spending more money with this change alone. There will be claimants across the range of benefits who will be unable to budget the cash for a whole month. I am especially concerned about the needs of mentally handicapped and/or ill patients, who may have previously been able to separate housing benefit from ESA/DLA, but will struggle when this all arrives in one lump sum (or will it be two if they get DLA?). I imagine local CMHTs will get busier, at least for a time.

 

Other claimants who have never worked full-time or at all will also find it difficult. Some may be tempted to go down the pub and p*** it all away. I think there will be others though that will just find it difficult to budget. Some people won't have seen their bank balance get that high before! (although high isn't really the right word, you can never call your bank balance high when on benefits lol)

 

I foresee (like Septic Peg) lots of Crisis Loan applications in the future. Of course many will be refused, but they'll still have to process the paper work. Honestly, in my opinion, this change shouldn't occur at all, like most of the other changes the Tories are insisting on.

 

Sorry for the essay... :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There will be instances where people can't manage and there will be plans to stop direct payment.

 

I am working on one of the local authorities in the direct payment scheme. we are paying council tenants and ha tenants hb direct every 4 weeks. There are risk groups and there are chances to stop direct payment when arrears build and if its not suitable to pay direct to tenant. The dwp will hopefully realise they will have to take people individual situations into account, but they don't really like to do that do they

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it's only the following involved in uc:

income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance

income-related Employment and Support Allowance

Income Support

Child Tax Credits

Working Tax Credits

Housing Benefit.

 

Dla or as it will be known in april, pip, is not a uc benefit as nystagmite stated

Link to post
Share on other sites

when does this come into force?

 

 

 

You never know by the time UC comes in, your have a Full time job by then been paid monthly and be working so hard your have No time to worry about anything ever again !

 

 

 

Night,Night don't have nightmare .....

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crisis loans cease to exist in their current form from April and will be dealt with by the local autorities.

It will be similar to when they moved weekly IS payments to fortnightly payments and from what I've read there won't be any exceptions :o but there is a lot being churned out regarding UC UJM to name but a few things and things seem to change daily!

As far as I'm aware UC is running behind schedule already but again that could change tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2013 for the pathfinder areas which is the northwest of England four areas – Tameside, Oldham, Wigan and Warrington - each month. It will test the new simpler, single benefit payment system The roll out will take place all through 2013 for migration of existing customers on the any of the qualifying benefits. April 2014 will see it 'go live' for new claims as all existing benefits are phased out.

The monthly payments are supposed to help those who have been 'benefit dependant' (not my thoughts or words) to get used to managing their own finances so that when that magical job appears, people will be wage ready, ie they will be able to manage the wage and budget x

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment the UC payment system isn't working yet. I do hope when it comes in that the official error rules will be the same as the DWP rules and not the HB/CTB rules.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

@flumps

Crisis loans cease to exist in their current form from April and will be dealt with by the local autorities.

That's the death knell for crisis loans then, there's no requirement for LA's to ring fence this money so it will be spent on a 'see fit' basis, which if my local authority is anything to go by means the mayors office will get a makeover.

 

The only access to emergency cash will be the pay day lenders.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crisis Loan Alignment Payments

From April 2013 Crisis Loan alignment payments and other Crisis Loans paid due to issues with benefit will be replaced by a new national scheme of Short Term Advances. This will be administered by the Department for Work and Pensions.

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's definetly monthly paid not 4 weekly.

"definetly" ??

Can you show verification for this? most other 'Monthly' payments are 4 weekly, which is what I suspect UC will be

Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the government will end up spending more money with this change alone. There will be claimants across the range of benefits who will be unable to budget the cash for a whole month. I am especially concerned about the needs of mentally handicapped and/or ill patients, who may have previously been able to separate housing benefit from ESA/DLA, but will struggle when this all arrives in one lump sum (or will it be two if they get DLA?). I imagine local CMHTs will get busier, at least for a time.

 

Other claimants who have never worked full-time or at all will also find it difficult. Some may be tempted to go down the pub and p*** it all away. I think there will be others though that will just find it difficult to budget. Some people won't have seen their bank balance get that high before! (although high isn't really the right word, you can never call your bank balance high when on benefits lol)

 

I foresee (like Septic Peg) lots of Crisis Loan applications in the future. Of course many will be refused, but they'll still have to process the paper work. Honestly, in my opinion, this change shouldn't occur at all, like most of the other changes the Tories are insisting on.

 

Sorry for the essay... :!:

 

I absolutly agree with this

 

This welfare state change over is causing so many people terrible stress like myself, there are also very very sick people with addictive disorders personalities with gambling, drinking, drug use addictions , i would think this will be dangerous for them if they are not able to keep control with the Universal credit that comes in one big lump sum into bank accounts?

 

That temptation alone will have dire consequences for them if their housing benefits are not being payed?

 

I just think its a total mess

Edited by kAPPS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...