Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay lets summarise as this is getting a tad messy.   Claimant issues two claims:- 2 separate claim numbers   Claim 1 JCF v both of us for our ltd company xx ltd- Claim 2 JCF v just my husband  his ltd company yy ltd Claims are dated xxxxxxx ? Particulars of claim identical ?    Claim 1 is progressing normally and at Disclosure stage......full particularised defence submitted. ....N265 exchanged....Statements yet to be filed and served. Claim 2 was progressing normally but now claimant has made application for Summary judgment.....minimal defence submitted by Solicitor.   Claimant/Court failed to serve copy of application and evidence in support Court informs you they also failed to serve any evidence with court re their application.   Hearing date has been set for application dated xxxxxx ?  Hearing will be remote by telephone but the claimant cant use any evidence as it failed to submit or serve.   Have you scanned / redacted and uploaded their N244  here to your topic ?    
    • well at some point a DN has been issued, if was issued late, is sadly of little importance.   why dont you sar both of them...    
    • If the judge agrees that they are responsible for the consequences of the poor fitting – then yes, the judge will most likely award the entire amount of £480. There are two things to persuade the judge about: that the gasket blew as a result of the poor installation of the turbo that the cost of the work replacing the gasket was not excessive – in other words it was a reasonable cost. Of course we will support you in that we will give you advice and help you prepare – but of course at the end of the day the case is yours to win or lose. You know that we are thoroughly on your side. As I have said already, it will really help a great deal if you can get some garage mechanics to agree that the poorly fitted turbo would be likely to result in a blown gasket. If you have got the evidence – the old gasket and the bolts – then that will be very helpful. But you will have to do a good statement – and do some pictures. The way to do this statement would be to describe what has happened and then when you come to the turbo, for instance, you put in brackets (picture number one). When you come to the bolts, then you do the same thing (picture number two). Et cetera. That way you have a concise readable statement which references the pictures which should be stapled to the back of it. Also of course you will produce the bolts and the gasket in court. I think what will also be very helpful is the fact that the garage attempted to avoid you and to refuse to deal with you. I don't think the judge will be very impressed by that and this will assist you a great deal.  
    • seems more and more confirmed that Trump appointees delayed and restricted Capitol Police and National guard efforts to address expected Trump(Orange)/white supremacist attack on Capitol Hill     https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/01/26/us/biden-trump-impeachment
    • there is no template but as you say you saw the FTMDave reply ...
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Supermarkets deliberately confuse customers


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2942 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have often noticed that supermarkets will show price per Kg of products on the shelf.

This helps the consumer make an informed choice regarding the size and pricing of a product.

But, to confuse customers they will often show price per 100gms of the same product but maybe a different brand.

I think this is a blatant example of deception designed to make customers, not that good with their sums, unable to make a comparison.:!:

Today, however, in Sainsbury's I saw a real hum-dinger!

A box of 40 camomile tea bags was show with the price per 100gms. The same make of camomile tea bags in a box of 20 was shown as 5p per unit!:!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

this was coverd on one of the consumer programs recently too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?951-Supermarket-Price-Comparison

 

This was the subject of the first of our January Focus newsletters this month. John Denham MP is introducing a private members bill in Parliament on January 15th.

 

The article is well worth a read, link above.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...