Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing benefit stops because temporary work


id330uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4054 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in jobseekers' allowance and I have done several times temporary work and when I brought my payslips to the Housing Department my entitlement to housing benefit was recalculated and sometimes I was awarded 0 entitlement and I was not paid anymore Housing Department during a specific period but my claim was not closed.However last time I did temporary work and I brought my payslips to the Housing Department my claim for housing benefit was closed entirely. I have been told by the Housing Department that my claim was closed because I earned too much.I would like to know if the Housing Department has not wrongly closed my claim for Housing Benefit because I think that as long as I live at the same address I am entitled not to have my claim closed and in case there are changes in my earnings my entitlement to housing benefit should be simply recalculated.I think that if every time I do temporary work I have to do a new claim for housing benefit this will be very inconvenient specially that last time the Housing Department did not inform me of the closure of my claim. The Housing Department told me that a letter was sent to me in October telling me that my claim for Housing Benefit is closed but I never received this letter.I would like to know what is the law which deals with this issue because I would like to know if the Housing Department has properly applied it. Because of the closure of my previous claim for Housing Benefit I have to do another claim and I have to ask to have it backdated and I would like to know what to tell to the Housing Department to convince it to backdate my new claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if your income is too high and you cease to be entitled to hb, your claim should normally be closed

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been told that my claim was closed several months ago and I noticed nothing. If id6052was right there will be very little incentive in taking up temporary work because not only we have to make a new claim but we have to wait a long time before being paid again Housing Benefit especially if we are not aware that our claim has been closed. Unless id6052is wrong and we are entitled to '0 entitlement' instead of having our claim entirely closed only because we do some temporary work but this depends on the law which deals with this issue. It is why I would like to know this law.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well generally if there is over a months break in the claim then we will insist on a new claim being done, but really it's down to the individual councils how they deal with this. Where I work, I would personally just do a quick form with you and assess from there. Some assessors may wish to do the longer form with you? Either way (again where I work, it's not nationwide) you would be interviewed all info taken from you, within a fortnight of first contact, and claim paid asap. Which depending on dwp assessing your jsa promptly could be paid, then your claim would be paid that day, or the following. Or the dwp may send in a rapid reclaim form form that you would have completed and we use that.

 

But all that is where I work.

 

Nationally, other la's work differently in the new claim process. But regardless it's a new claim and a form is needed

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/hbgm-a2-claims.pdf page 24

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that to earn too much for a short period is not a good reason to close entirely a claim for housing benefit otherwise this will cause too much inconvenience and it is why I think that when I previously did temporary work sometimes I was paid ‘0 entitlement’ but my claim was never entirely closed. I think that maybe in the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006 it is made reference to a five weeks period during which the claimant should receive no housing benefit before his claim being entirely closed but there are other Housing Benefit Regulations for other years. I think also that all these regulations apply in the same way to all the councils . I would like to know if I am right or wrong on these points

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if we have assessed your claim and it's nil entitled we aren't going to keep it open to see if you then go back on jsa, that would mean way to much work. We would need to diary date your claim to check in 4 weeks to see if your entitled again. Sorry but assessors have so much work at the moment and this would just add additional stress on an already stretched service.

 

This is policy written by central government, maybe it would be best to discuss with your local mp, and see if he can bring it up in parliament? Perhaps when hb goes and uc has been brought into your area then the system will change?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also maybe your claim was never fully closed down cause it was suspended. Maybe just delay providing the info? As the claim can be suspended for 1 month, you then have another month to supply proof for claim to be reopened.

 

If it nil then claim is closed asap

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim was already assessed and I was entitled to HB. Last time I did temporary work my claim was not suspended but entirely closed. To close entirely a claim after someone has done temporary work will give a lot more work to the Housing Department because it will be necessary to make another claim and the Housing Department will have to assess it entirely. What is important is the law which deals with this issue but on condition that we know it. If we want to complain to MP it is necessary first to know the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I don't know the particulars of the law, I follow the regulations and guidance I am provided with, perhaps write to the housing benefit manager at your local council and ask for the particular law etc. they should have that information for you?

 

The only time we can close a claim and reopen without a form would be after an extended payment. We cannot reopen a claim without a new claim form after it being closed for longer than 4 weeks.

 

I will have a quick look through all my stuff for a particular law ref for you, otherwise I hope someone irrv will come along who is up on the law refs. Surely you won't need to go to mp with that info anyway, can't he/she get access to that, from hb manager etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been told that my claim was closed several months ago and I noticed nothing. If id6052was right there will be very little incentive in taking up temporary work because not only we have to make a new claim but we have to wait a long time before being paid again Housing Benefit especially if we are not aware that our claim has been closed. Unless id6052is wrong and we are entitled to '0 entitlement' instead of having our claim entirely closed only because we do some temporary work but this depends on the law which deals with this issue. It is why I would like to know this law.

.

Unfortunately if you are not entitled then your claim is closed. I agree with you, there is no incentive to move from the dole to temp or part-time work. The pain is bigger than the modest earning you get from the job.

 

Look at one of my previous topics. I had to request to close retroactively my HB claim as I had a part time job with fluctuating hours and mu council made a mess. This way I got peace of mind but I lost probably a couple of hundred pounds.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this ref for you relating to the local authority closing the hb/Ctb claim if no longer entitled

 

Hb79(1); hb60+59(1); Ctb 60+50(1); Ctb 67(1); dar 8(2)

Taken from guidance books we are given

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/specialist-guides/technical-guidance/rr2-a-guide-to-housing-benefit/claiming-housing-benefit-and-council/ relates to closing of claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that we have to do the difference between end of entitlement to housing benefit i.e. we are paid ‘0 entitlement’and the entire closure of the claim as long as we live at the same address

 

I find strange that if we have received housing benefit for a long time our claim is closed only because we earn too much for only one week because of temporary work

 

Maybe I have found the answer because in the Housing Benefit Regulation act 2006 I have found that when we are paid weekly our entitlement to housing benefit is calculated over five weeks period. Hence maybe we are paid '0 entitlement' and our claim is also entirely closed when we have been earning too much for five weeks. In reality I am sure of nothing and I still not know exactly the law on this issue

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are 3 common scenarios that occur where a person is doing temporary work

 

scenario 1 - temporary part time work on a very low wage

If you are doing temporary part time work, the earnings are deducted from your JSA, however if you are receiving a very low wage and you retain some entitlement to JSA, you continue to be entitled to HB/CTB.

 

scenario 2 - temporary work that relates to a past period and has ended

If you have done temporary work for a past period and returned to JSA before your HB/CTB has been reassessed, the LA can do a closed period supersession, this means they reassess your HB/CTB for the period you were working to a nil assessment but your ongoing HB/CTB remains in payment.

 

scenario 3 - temporary work that is ongoing

If you are doing temporary work which is ongoing when your HB/CTB is reassessed, the LA will reassess your HB/CTB and if your income exceeds the level at which you would qualify, your award is terminated. If your income decreases at a future date or if you reclaim JSA, you would need to make a new HB/CTB claim.

 

It appears that on previous instances, you may have fell into scenario 2, but on the most recent instance, you have fell into scenario 3.

Edited by id6052

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My situation was that the temporary work was not on-going but I was not yet into JSA again because my rapid re-claim for JSA was being assessed. However in the letter that I brought to the Housing Department accompanying the photocopies of my payslips I stated that I made a rapid reclaim for JSA and that I was waiting for the outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what period did your temporary work cover?

what date did your previous award of JSA end?

what date did your new award of JSA end?

what date was your HB/CTB reassessed?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date did you put in the letter and payslips?

also did council send you any letters asking for payslips? if so, on what dates?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I brought my payslips it was in reply to a letter fromthe Housing Department asking me for my payslips. These payslips related to three andhalf days of work in the previous month and to nine days of work in the same month.My previous claim for JSA ended three weeks earlier because I worked more than16 hours per weeks. I did not know in what date my claim for HB for reassessed andclosed because I received no letter telling me that my claim for HB was closed

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date did your claim for hb stop? And what date was the claim reopened? It's really hard to answer or give help if you don't have this info?

 

End of the day you are arguing about regulations and they need to be addressed by central government/mp not anyone on here or the local authority that assessed your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For any single change or circumstance, however small, my council will stop my Housing Benefit claim. Then it takes up to 8 weeks to reinstate it. Yes, you might get all your money back, but it is discouranging.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I can imagine it is very annoying to reapply and then it takes a period of time to be reassessed. It does need to be looked at, thing is we are bound by what central government says. unfortunately we have to close the claim and then reopen when circs change ie awarded jsa.

 

If op knows when temp job is due to finish , then maybe when change of circs done, to notify of work, put in new claim straight away for when job is expected to finish. You can claim 13 weeks in advance of when your situation will change and you will be entitled again. However we would have to wait for jsa to be awarded before awarding hb.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I always believed that we have up to four weeks to make a claim for housing benefit when we move in a new accommodation not to lose benefit. However I read that housing benefit is paid only from the Mondays after we make a claim what means that we have to claim housing benefit immediately after having moved in a new accommodation and not to wait four weeks.

 

I would like to know if there has been a change in law and when it has taken place

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

That is true however most councils will allow you to apply for backdating should you have a valid reason for not claiming earlier.

 

There is also the ability to claim housing benefit for two homes should the need arise (you have to move before your old tenancy runs out)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if the reason why I did not claim earlier was that I was mistaken and I believed that there will be an automatic backdating of up to four weeks I do not know if this will be considered as a good reason by the council to ask to have my claim backdated.

I know that for claiming working tax credit there is an automatic backdating. The main point is to know if there has been a change in law few years ago and I can maybe put forward as reason why I did not claim earlier the fact that I was not aware of this change of the law

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are in receipt of IS, ESA(ir) or JSA(ib) when you move, you have one calendar month to make a claim for it to go back

 

if you are not in receipt of IS, ESA(ir) or JSA(ib) when you move, you need to make your claim and move in during the benefit week your tenancy starts (a benefit week run from Mon to Sun)

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...