Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My employers and benefit fraud


MiniLove82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i recently found out from a `very` trustworthy source that the managing director at my place of employment gave the ok for the accounts department to take some money from the monthly wages of a junior director and give his wife a payslip making it look like she is working 20 hours a week so she can claim benefits but really its her husbands money. is this wrong because i think this would surely come under benefit fraud. if i were to report this does anyone have any idea what would happen to the three of them and also to my employers as i like a lot of the other senior staff who to my knowledge have no idea this is happening some one please help. I could do with some help tonight as i need to `do something` about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you could phone the benefits fraud line and make an annonymous report, but if they are found to be victims of gossip, then you will feel a bit guilty.

 

Unless I were 100% sure that someone was committing fraud, then I don't think I would be phoning the benefit fraud line.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you need to do something about it?

First-you have no actual proof that the Company is splitting the directors salary-word of mouth is insufficient. In addition, if the wife is being paid as well, she and the Company are paying National Insurance

contributions.

Second-you have no proof at all that the wife is claiming benefits. If she was entitled to benefits, she would surely be able to claim more if she was earning nothing at all.

Third-as a whistle blower you would stand a good chance of being dismissed in line with so many other whistle blowers. And they at least were sure that there was dishonesty involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be very, very careful that you have your facts correct before you do anything.

 

Basically, if they are investigated for benefit fraud and the fraud investigation team believe there is a case to answer, they will be prosecuted. There is usually some leeway depending on the amount if it's a simple case of overpayment, but this isn't...if the facts you have given are correct, it's clear cut fraud. I can't imagine that they wouldn't be prosecuted in this case.

 

A conviction for fraud can have an impact on whether or not someone can be the Director of a company, so you would have to make a qualified choice on the impact that this could have on your employer's business.

 

If you decide to do this, I would make very sure that your information cannot be traced back to either you or your very trustworthy source. If this turns out to be incorrect workplace gossip, you're unlikely to feature very high on any of the Directors Christmas card list if they figure out that it's you who reported them.

 

For what it's worth, if it was me, I wouldn't touch this with a bargepole unless I had been standing there listening while the Directors had the conversation, and then watched the accounts department put her on the payroll.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if ive been very reliably informed i should say or are you saying i should say noting and let them get away with it surely thats wrong!!!

 

Again, I would reiterate that you don't know what you've been told is actually fact.

 

Another thing to think about is that should the Police be involved in this, even if they are not prosecuted the fact they were investigated could show up on an enhanced Criminal Records Check. In other words, the decision you make could have implications for these people for many years to come, even if the information you have given turns out to be untrue.

  • Confused 1

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that somebody has been unsucessfully investigated by HMRC/DWP/LA for benefit fraud would not show up on a Criminal Records Check (basic or enhanced) - even if somebody is successfully investigated, it would not normally show up unless they were prosecuted or admitted offence under caution.

 

If you know for a fact that this is happening, you can make an anonymous allegation to HMRC/DWP/LA and allow them to investigate the matter.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would reiterate wholly the sound advice the others have given you. You cannot surely,in all conscience,think that 2nd or 3rd hand gossip(and thats what it is,workplace gossip) is worth screwing peoples lives up.If they are committing benefit fraud they are taking a huge risk and hopefully when they get caught they will pay a far heavier price than the few quid they are gaining at the moment.

Are you sure the person who tittle tattled to you isn't setting you up? Why do you have to be the one to report this? Is the person who allegedly heard this not capable of ringing the benefits people? I would be very reluctant to act on gossip.

Lillibelle

 

I only know what I know cos I know it,I only give advice,I'm not legally trained nor do I pretend to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how long does it take and what do they actually do from when i report them

 

how long is a piece of string?

 

i am a bit confused as to what type of benefit fraud is actually being suggested, as to me it sounds more like a tax dodge than benefit fraud

 

each agency will approach it differently, and each investigation will be based upon the individual facts of the case, however as a rough rule of thumb, the investigating agency would

 

  1. sift allegations to determine whether there was sufficient information to warrant an investigation
  2. gather evidence if required
  3. determine whether an interview is necessary
  4. refer evidence to a DM for a decision
  5. consider whether sanction action is appropriate

some cases could take matter of days, other cases it may be years

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that somebody has been unsucessfully investigated by HMRC/DWP/LA for benefit fraud would not show up on a Criminal Records Check (basic or enhanced) - even if somebody is successfully investigated, it would not normally show up unless they were prosecuted or admitted offence under caution.

 

If you know for a fact that this is happening, you can make an anonymous allegation to HMRC/DWP/LA and allow them to investigate the matter.

 

I agree...that's why I said that it would show if the Police were to be involved.

i am a bit confused as to what type of benefit fraud is actually being suggested, as to me it sounds more like a tax dodge than benefit fraud

 

I also think that this is very likely the case, which further makes me think that the OP doesn't have the full story, or that the person giving the OP is either misinformed or otherwise incorrect.

"Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me". Martin Niemöller

 

"A vital ingredient of success is not knowing that what you're attempting can't be done. A person ignorant of the possibility of failure can be a half-brick in the path of the bicycle of history". - Terry Pratchett

 

If I've been helpful, please click my star. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's possible to work and claim benefits at the same time. Benefits such as housing and council tax benefit are based on income and not the amount of hours you work.

 

i dont know what your actually trying to say, surely just the fact that he is giving some of his wages to his wife making it look like she is working is wrong and surely this is fraud no matter what he is doing it for (benefit or tax dodge)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i recently found out from a `very` trustworthy source that the managing director at my place of employment gave the ok for the accounts department to take some money from the monthly wages of a junior director and give his wife a payslip making it look like she is working 20 hours a week so she can claim benefits but really its her husbands money. is this wrong because i think this would surely come under benefit fraud. if i were to report this does anyone have any idea what would happen to the three of them and also to my employers as i like a lot of the other senior staff who to my knowledge have no idea this is happening some one please help. I could do with some help tonight as i need to `do something` about it

 

My hunch, and it's only a hunch is this is about the new child benefit rules in which case if you were to report them it would be the DWP that would be the people needing to know. If one person of the couple earns £50,000 their eligibility is affected, but each in a couple can both earn £45,000 and be fully eligible. I suspect the fathers wages are high enough to affect their eligibility, so to change that he has syphoned off some of his wages to her so that they jointly receive the same wages they would have received anyway added together, but this way remain fully eligible for child benefit.

 

Personally I think it demonstrates the stupidity of the new system on eligibility for child benefit, that one hard working person earning x amount with a hard working dedicated home maker are not eligible but two working parents both earning £45,000 so a grand £90,000 in total are.

 

Is this worth reporting? Personally, I wouldn't. But if you choose to, you can do it anonymously online. However any investigation will lead to them and those in the know in the workplace trying to work out who the informant was and two and two may well make four. Something to consider.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont know what your actually trying to say, surely just the fact that he is giving some of his wages to his wife making it look like she is working is wrong and surely this is fraud no matter what he is doing it for (benefit or tax dodge)

 

Have you considered that if fraud is investigated and it goes to court, the defendent may apply to a judge to request the details of any informants. I doubt that any judge would grant this, if there was enough evidence to support a prosecution but there is still a slim chance. I don't think annonymity is 100% guaranteed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you considered that if fraud is investigated and it goes to court, the defendent may apply to a judge to request the details of any informants. I doubt that any judge would grant this, if there was enough evidence to support a prosecution but there is still a slim chance. I don't think annonymity is 100% guaranteed.

 

That wouldn't happen & if the allegation was made anonymously (as most already are) it would be impossible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That wouldn't happen & if the allegation was made anonymously (as most already are) it would be impossible.

 

I believe that they do ask for name and address details for their files.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

For what its worth I wouldnt report it unless I could hand on heart say I had never done anything wrong in my life, let him who is without sin etc etc. it may well be for tax reasons and if a benefit is awarded on income it would be on the household income so it dosnt matter who is getting it if they were a couple, the only thing it might change is the child benefit under the new rules and if it is fraudulent they may well get caught out anyway, sound liuke a bit of the old green eyed monster to me

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you can inform anonymously. The online site says you can provide your name and address if you want to be kept updated but you don't have to. Nothing would go to court based solely on anonynous evidence, it would go to court because investigators have investigated and found firm provable evidence of fraud that they can then submit. The anonymous (or otherwise) tip off isn't the evidence, it's what starts off the evidence gathering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...